A rundown on what Snopes did.
>Jacob and David Wohl tweets about Obama golfing while the 2016 flooding
>These tweets were than either mistakably or purposely interpreted to mean that they implied the flooding during Katrina
>Snopes writes an smug "factcheck article" about how Obama wasn't President during but certain Conservative Twitter users think so
>They're called out on their bullshit so they update the artical to include other accounts supposedly pushing the Katrina narrative
>However just about every one of these accounts are falseflagging
As of now the the site still pushes the narrative they made up.
>>139817450
Yeah, it's some embezzling Jew and his porn star wife. Nobody should take them seriously
As of now these are the supposed accounts that pushed the Katrina narrative that they still have on their site.
http://www.snopes.com/barack-obama-katrina/
>>139817450
Snopes is fake news, just ignore that shit
>>139817615
However these accounts have almost no followers or are obvious falseflaggers.
Snopes is complicit
Gas worthy kikery
>>139817450
>>139817571
Why would you trust these people to declare when something is legitimate or not?
>>139817717
It's something they successfully got away with. They should be called out on it.
>>139817615
Another account featured.
>>139817615
They even admit it during the edit, and yet still include Wohl's tweets in the newly edited version.
>>139817450
Seen some niggers on Twitter being smug like
>Heh Republicans think Obama was president during Katrina
>Heh Republicans watch Fox News
>Heh Fox News probably told them this
>>139817826
I don't, but they're still prominently featured in search results of common political questions.
>>139817450
Apparently Snopes is involved in a big lawsuit right now
http://archive.is/Fop5k
>Snopes operating expenses are over $100k per month.
Wew lads.
>>139818205
Something in my gut tells me snopes' results are heavily (((promoted))) in search results.
THey always pull that shit. They will take a story about a man flew into space, and say it is false because the man only flew 55 miles above the earth, which technically is not space. It was actually amusing to see the flagrant shit they pulled on many political topics they covered.
>>139817826
>He fucks that
wew
>>139818361
No they're divorced but still work together. Here is his new wife.
>>139817450
Snopes isn't credible friend.
Not much is. At least wikipedia shows what goes on behind the scenes, but I doubt many people know how or what to look for in the talk and history pages. Google, duckduckgo, even real libraries. So much for the free flow of information.
>>139818743
He bought a wife? No wonder Snopes is having financial issues.
>>139818743
nice
>>139818893
I know they pull this shit before, but honestly it bites my ass that shit like this >>139817938 is able to be not called out.
>>139817938
I understand, but they should be treated like CNN and the rest of the fake news outlets, just don't read snopes and never link to them, they're a propaganda firm
>>139819378
but their game nights look hella fun
BWAAA HAAAA HAAAA HAAAA HAAA
>>139818743
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/amp/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
>>139819484
Whoa.
>>139817450
Trump supporters actually think Obama was president during Katrina though
>>139818361
I would fuck the cat too if I had to sit around that disgusting green blob all day
>>139817450
Okay here's what you need to do
1. Go to Snopes
2. Look for the article on Sean King racial controversy
3. Scroll down to the picture of his blatantly white father
4. Read "An image stated to be a mug shot from the arrest of Jeffery Wayne King showed a man who appeared to be white (but not definitively)"
5. Never read Snopes again
Glad I could help.
>>139819484
What game is that?
>>139819484
This mongrel sack of shit
>articles "fact checking" things that received international news coverage and can already be verified with simple searches in 5 seconds
Remember when snopes used to be about urban legends?
>>139822253
Snopes confirms that is false.
>>139824408
Indeed, Snopes was never "about urban legends"
It was dedicated to fact checking modern myths
- Snopes