So what did /pol/ think about this movie? Just watched it and

>>139757277
absolute kino

File: star_trek_lead.jpg (308KB, 825x464px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 825x464px

>>139757277
That poster is so cliche

File: 26dfbb8ce462bc7a19b3215081866abc.jpg (35KB, 530x785px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 530x785px

>>139758153

File: 962644942275f0e351701afed7a37365.jpg (71KB, 600x889px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 600x889px

>>139758196

File: MV5BMTk0MDQ3MzAzOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNzU1NzE3MjE@._V1_UY1200_CR92,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg (91KB, 630x1200px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 630x1200px

>>139758237

liked it, didn't like the fags they casted though

>>139757277
Feminists and SJWs hate it, so of course it was good.

File: c36507deb88f7400974e3c939d2d4b9d--sexy-back-poster-designs.jpg (108KB, 736x565px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 736x565px

>>139758278

File: 10268469_293359494183037_6960303768629167929_n.jpg (86KB, 714x960px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 714x960px

>>139757277
I think these idiots gave us the end of civilization and handed everyone over to the Jews to be enslaved forever.

I think you can go fuck yourself

>>139757277
watching brits drown and burn at the same time
>how could pol not like it

>>139757277
>early scene
>french appear
>have a based black guy
>"Only English past this point"
>rest of film has only huwhites
Is Christopher Nolan /ourgoy/?

>>139757277
It was more like a video game than a movie. Each scene was pretty much modulized; you could scramble them up and the movie would have just as much continuity.

>go to some place
>get attacked
>escape
>repeat

There was minimal character development, and it was actually difficult for me to tell the main characters apart at times. The action scenes, as intense as they were, weren't all that engaging because I didn't feel connected to the characters at any level. It also annoyed me how nice the characters' haircuts were; it actually drew me out of the film quite a bit. They're supposed to have been in war for months, and their cuts are nicer than mine.

It might not have been cucked, but it really wasn't that good of a movie overall.

File: FaceApp_1504126987294.jpg (583KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 1280x1280px

>>139757277
Shit movie that seems to be extremely popular with people who don't know how to human

File: bugmen.jpg (28KB, 550x258px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 550x258px

>>139758880
>There was minimal character development
it is impersonal by design, they're all strangers yet part of a nation, like extended family, neoliberal bugmen hivepeople wouldn't understand

And how would you rate the history part anons?
Was it accurate?
I know it's a Hollywoodian movie, but I didn't see anything out of place!

>>139758880
I pretty much agree with this, all points, especially the hair.

Good to see almost all white people for once.

Massive bonus points for triggering the sjw's.

It's not Band of Brothers, but's alright, and will hold up over time.

>>139757277
>no Mary sues
What are brit pilots ?

>>139759457

>assblasted frog


Doing your job at war does not equate Mary sueing

Go surrender somewhere else

File: CHECKED.jpg (123KB, 750x1024px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 750x1024px

>>139758444

>>139759222
The bong general is hilariously naive and ill-informed or voluntary misleading. The 30-40k figures he talks about at the start was obviously about a much different situation, brits were not about to let 250k soldiers get captured and the main fleet was about to come anyway, it just happened sooner than expected.

The movie gives the impression soldiers were evacuated only at this place but it's obviously wrong. The civilian fleet had a much smaller role than it suggests. Military ships sink way too fast.

>>139759974
>>139759974
The main pilot destroys way too many ennemies, even WITHOUT gas, which is ridiculous. Even famous pilots barely broke 30 ennemy down on their ENTIRE career.

>>139758880
Retard alert.

1. Character development can happen through actions, not just words. Multiple actions in the film were used for this purpose.

2. The few words it used where extremely effective at developing character. A lot of people think character development = dialogue heavy script.

3. You're confusing character development with a tight narrative, something that Dunkirk did not set out to create. It aimed to focus on the forest, not the individual trees that make it up.

File: 1442312692713.gif (2MB, 236x224px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 236x224px

>>139761412

Stupid George

>>139757277

It was fucking boring.

Worth a redbox/10