‘Hitler Had Right Motives’ Comment Lands Japan’s Deputy

>>139619871
"gook" is for Koreans.

He's /ournip/

>>139619919

/ournip/

No. Given how Natsoc is so steeped in Marxist thought, having "good intentions" could be excusing the Marxist side of National socialism, while still distancing himself from support of the Nazis actions.

The problem is, the Nazis actions stemmed from the logical extension of socialism and "social justice for those who are deemed ethnically German" aka Völkisch equality.

The japs are looking to get nuked again.

>>139620526
>NatSoc
>Marxist

The word socialism scares you. Just because NatSoc has that word doesn't make it communism.

>>139620526
NatSoc is antithetical to Marxism.

Marxism is global, utopian, anti-hierarchical, race-blind (or aggressively anti-white in modern revisions), and based in class warfare. The historical theory behind it is utterly nonsensical.

NatSoc is national, hierarchical, predicated on struggle and growth, foments unity between classes, and promotes peoples striving towards their ethnic destinies.

>>139620792
No, but socialism is still fundamentally immoral, so we have a good reason to be scared of it in all its forms
I want to like you NatSocs, I really do, but you make it so hard sometimes

>>139621318
>NatSoc is antithetical to Marxism.
Indeed! Well done!

Nationalism is the antithesis/anathema of Globalism.

>>139621470
>but socialism is still fundamentally immoral
So, functional households are wrong? Are you suggesting that a successful family is not stronger than its weakest link?

File: fasces.png (17KB, 141x500px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 141x500px

tfw the neo-Marxists don't understand the simple concept(s) of overwhelming power.

Imagine: A digital 'fasces'

>>139621470
How is socialism immoral?