>Killing nazis was fine in 1944 >Punching nazis isn't

>>139605560
It's only okay to kill people when the government signs off on it.

>>139605560
>Killing commies was fine.. since ever
>Punching commies is still fine in 2017
Sucks to be you

because what people define as nazi in 2017 isn't what a nazi was in 1944.
Infact for the most part no definition is needed at all, if you "think" they are a nazi people will attack you.
Moreover People are attacking others and saying they are nazi's to justify it.
and because apparntly its lost on some people. Freedom of speech covers people being nazi's without being attacked.
also bare in mind that there is a big difference between fighting a war against a country where(for the sake of argument) they are all nazi's and attacking your own citizens because you disagree with what they may or may not believe.

fucking troll bait faggot. no one is so stupid as to not know this basic shit.

>killing muzzies was fine douring the gulf war
>it i-
wait a minute, we still are killing muzzies with drone strikes, lmao
this very day
It's perfectly fine to kill any mudslime you see. Wow, thanks OP!

File: 1490442589011.jpg (200KB, 650x1024px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 650x1024px

>>139605560
>killing nazis was fine in 1944
wrong

>>139605560
There's a fine line between free speech used for hate speech and hate speech used to incite a violent white race race riot chimpout.

>>139605560
>killing Muslims was fine in 1177
>killing Muslims isn't fine in 2017
Can someone explain the logic behind this?
smugfootcovfefe.jpg

Killing humans is only "legal" during a war when you're a soldier and even then only when ordered to do so.
Assault is still a crime for civilians and the first amendment gives retards the right to larp.

>>139605560
Because you're punching people for wearing a fucking red hat, yuh dumb shit. Some of them are girls.

>>139605560
Nazis in 1944 had guns and were goosestepping through the ashes of Europe back to Berlin to try and stop their daughters getting raped and eaten by starving communists, baking jew pies and making little kike lampshades on the way; but in 2017 they just stand on the street with signs and tell people not to pull down statues.

Basically the global climate has changed a little

>>139605560
Stop embarrassing Finland you fucking ape

>>139606057
Nazis in 2017 most definitely have guns.

>>139605560
Hey look buddy, they're not Nazis. They're Free Speech Advocates.

>>139605874
>Freedom of speech covers people being nazi's without being attacked.
No, freedom of speech just means the Govt can't arrest you for your most of your opinions.

File: Vietnam-War-Hub-A.jpg (71KB, 334x192px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 334x192px

>>139605560
>Killing commies was fine in 1969
>Punching commies isn't fine in 2017
Can someone explain the logic behind this?

>>139605560

>punching people pretending to be nazis

How does that work?!

Did you see the nazis from the 1940s

THOSE were real not some cucks running around thinking they belong in some GERMAN army.

>>139605931
This.
It was only fine because Goldstein and Berg convinced Smith and Cameron that it was in their interest.

If any of those soldiers would see society today, they would have quickly rejected the idea.

>>139605560
Who said killing nazis was fine in 1944?
My granddad was one of these nazis, I wouldn't have been fine with him getting killed.

>>139606162
..right but it also means that the government cannot turn a blind eye because of what you said.

ie. you can say anti-government shit. and someone can come attack you for that, but that is still a crime, the police cannot just ignore for any reason. People can do whatever the fuck they want for whatever reason.
you could say"have a nice day" and someone could punch you and its just as wrong as if you said"heil hitler"

in both cases you had the right to say either statement and i had the same right to attack you.

so yeah. freedom of speech means you say nazi shit and not get in trouble for it. social backlash sure but people cannot kill or punch yo for being a nazi just like you couldnt kill or punch someone for NOT being a nazi

>>139605560

Wheraboo LARPers

NatSoc is no better than Communism. It's just a boot of a different leather.

>>139605560
the term "nazi" has changed to: "someone the left doesn't agree with" instead of what it used to mean.
It's literally a buzzword now.

>>139605560
I think civil war hasn't started yet

File: kjhhgk.jpg (189KB, 1477x1600px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1477x1600px

>>139605560

It's 2017

File: this machine kills commies.jpg (1MB, 1564x1564px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1564x1564px

>>139605560
Because we literally have laws on the book that make it illegal to be a fucking communist in America.

>>139606236
I argue that not all germans were nazi's in 1944.
just because it was a nazi state. for the majoity of its politcal office it was a dictatorship/had removed the ability to be removed from power(stilla chancellor but removed other names from the ballet and vote fixing etc) even at the hight of their influence they wern't 100% of the population and i doubt 100% of the army either.
most Nazi's probably wernt even aware of what was happening to the JEws or had a bit of cognative dissodence like all of Americans have to that segment of history where they thought they were Heroes for killing nazi's when they were basically doing the exact same shit with blacks,japs and native americans.

really, was it ok to kill a democrat? republican? tory? labour? does this argument work? It really just assumes if your part of a state that you are whatever that state is currently run by regardless of political climate

File: 1492112505734.jpg (375KB, 1274x830px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1274x830px

>>139605560
yeah its simple your a faggot

>>139606526
lol how wrong can u be?

File: GoingToHell.png (909KB, 1488x777px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 1488x777px

>>139605560

>>139605560
There aren't actual Nazis walking about. I mean, be honest with yourself: when you have heard someone saying the 14 words at a political rally? Red armbands? Swastika flags? Whatever you think you saw don't do those things, so they're fundamentally not NatSoc. Pick a different word to label them rather than getting high off the smell of your own ass and screeching that anyone is a Nazi as long as you have called them a Nazi.

File: seal.png (347KB, 682x674px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 682x674px

>>139607019

yes there are

>>139605874
The definition of 'nazi' has no meaning anymore. anyone who doesn't share your opinions is now a Nazi.

File: DoNotHarmBeauty.png (1MB, 1488x777px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1488x777px

>>139605560

you're a bad person

>>139605966
Antifag is a white race chimpout. Congratulations for defining yourself.

>>139607126
>posting on an image board
>walking about / at a political rally
Pick one faggot. And if you do go out there with your brown suit and red armband then power to you for exercising your right. Ya got a set of brass balls.

But you aren't doing that.

>>139605560
Because you touch me and I'm going to track not only you but your family down. Stick to buzzfeed forums, want to be tough guy.

>>139606526
Communism embraces degeneracy. NatSoc strives to improve the country as a whole, but everyone has to pitch in for the greater good. Just look at China, Russia, communism doesn't work it programs people to be useless human leeches.

>>139605560
we were at war you retarded mongol

>>139605560
We were at war with the nazis in 1944 you obvious fucking shill. Nowadays you cunts will call anybody you disagree with a nazi.

>>139607140
its just an excuse to punch people that are offering better aguments to the left.
used to be screeming like autistic faggots. Now they utilized what they have learnt from all those debates about sexism
"please remember moronlefty that women can punch men and get away with it this is real sexism...."
obviosuly they have been paying attention to us. WE gave them the weapons. They know that there are certain circumstances that mean they get a pass. Women attacking men was an easy one but the slow cow people learnt more.

"shhiirrrrrrt we call them nazi! then we can punch them all we want! "

They have their get out of jail free card. if we try and say we arnt nazi's they say"well of course they'd say that, they are a nazi, cannot tru st a nazi"
if we say that you are just using it as an excuse"they double down and say we are using o ur nazi trixxx"
no one will listen because anyone that talks to a nazi is a nazi and will get punched too.
wonder what the endgame is

File: WOLF ANGEL.png (2MB, 864x1296px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 864x1296px

>>139607140

seems like you're jumping to a lot of conclusions

>>139607311
Stick to 4chan, want to be the tough guy

The Americans who are supposedly nazis are not actually nazis.

File: HalloweenHeart.png (83KB, 304x291px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 304x291px

N.'.ZI'S <3 U

>>139605560
visit sweden, then tell us how you feel about Hitler

>>139607564
>Tough guys? Well, that must be me. Better respond with an ass hurt rebuttal because this is the best I'm ever going to offer
You were saying, bot?

>>139605560
I can explain. Most of the Nazis today are only known because of their online presence, and their feelings are hurt.

>>139605560
Oh simple, the current american "nazis" aren't even remotely nazis.

It's just commies overreacting, however commies acting like shit will surely create some actual nazis.

File: Nazis Love You NONHD.png (2MB, 1440x960px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x960px

>>139607761

stop hurting people's feelings

File: HalloweenSunSealSmall.png (101KB, 266x268px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 266x268px

>>139607806

> american "nazis" aren't even remotely nazis.

don't be so sure about that

File: 1499469060070.jpg (86KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 600x600px

>waving nazi flags
>calling for formation of a white ethnostate by any means needed
>talking about how evil jews are
>not nazis

>Killing niggers was fine 200 years ago
>Killing niggers isn't fine in 2017

Wtf, someone explain the logic behind this

File: NazisLoveYouTapestry.png (103KB, 372x807px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 372x807px

>>139608280

whats a nature habitat?

>>139608162
They're calling libertarians Nazis at this point, stop playing dumb/coy. You can image dump your NatSoc LARP folder all you want but your little comments are completely retarded.

>>139607806
Agreed. Get rid of antifag, bamn, blm, curb (((the media))) bias and all your nazi problems magically disappear.

File: did_you_hear_that_on_cnn.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>>139606113

...and government is supposed to protect you from assault.

...so...

Are you retarded or trolling?

File: free.png (130KB, 582x593px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 582x593px

>>139606113
>No, freedom of speech just means the Govt can't arrest you for your most of your opinions.
If you can't speak freely out of fear of violence, do you have freedom of speech?
Freedom of speech, as a principle, requires that anybody who wants to peacefully express their opinion, can.
Even outside freedom of speech, attacking people is already a crime, whether or not they're "Nazis".
When you are the person targeting people for their political opinions, you also become a terrorist.

>>139606859
The Nazis had tremendous support and I bet the average German would've ridden the pedal-powered-brain-bashing machine themselves after what those kikes did during the Weimar

>>139608326
Someone please tell that to the black '''community''' as they have not read the memo. Oh wait, reading...

File: KerberosAwakes.gif (1MB, 331x400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 331x400px

>>139608394

why do you feel the need to belittle people rather than trying to understand them? learning stops when you think you know. and don't believe everything you think.

Does calling someone something make it so?

Does not calling someone something make it not so?

>>139605560
There is no logic, just excuses for white supremacist to push their meme ideology. Truth is, it still is okay to gun down Nazis in the streets when you see one.

>>139608394
>libertarian nazi
What?
Don't tell me next time you would say libertarian statist, faggot.

>>139605560
It's fine, but antifa are (((communists))) and are as vile as Nazis.

File: Squires Trial.png (753KB, 575x808px) Image search: [Google]

753KB, 575x808px

>>139609084

Nazi Templar
Nazi Crusader
Nazi Inquisitor
Nazi Paladin
Nazi Cleric
Nazi Priest
Nazi Nun
Nazi Temple
Nazi Cathedral
Nazi Missionary
Nazi Angel

>>139608537
thx for using the word community loosely. i tend to think of the black """community""" as a tribal drug infested wasteland. travel at your own risk. would rather see multiple fires rampage thru every ghetto. as the monkeys flee the fire, layer after layer of defensive lines open fire and gun down the shitlets, sheboons, and niggers

>>139608779
Are you really implying that American libertarians are not being labeled Nazis as freedom rallies in America? Drop your persecution complex loser, I'm not your enemy.

>>139605560
Because of war, you nigger.

>>139605560
Nazis are no longer a governmental power that we are currently at war with

>>139605560
The definition of "Nazi" has changed.
1944 Nazi:
>member of the national socialist party of germany and slave to hitler's will

2017 Nazi:
>anyone who disagrees with ultra-leftist "progressive" identity politics

File: a one and a two and a three and a four hit it.png (269KB, 1472x1748px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1472x1748px

>>139609293

Testing

File: 1503806303711.jpg (167KB, 731x1000px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 731x1000px

>>139609412

sounds like we've got an army of 75,000,000 Nazis in the USA.

>>139605560
There were nazis in 1944. There aren't any Nazis in 2017, aside from about 5000 that haven't come out into the public eye yet. We do have a huge communist problem though.

>>139605560
They're not Nazis. I don't know what's so hard about that for you guys. They're not advocating fornkikking all the Jews. They want Ann ethno state and really most black and brown people I know irl aren't even upset about that and are like "so the white people just want to have their own country? Ok? Let them have it."

>>139605560
>implying killing nazis was fine in 1944
We fought for the wrong side and deep down we all know it.

>>139605838
>le everyone but me is a le communist

>>139609659
>They're not advocating fornkikking all the Jews.
???
https://youtu.be/n12sjwk9FBE

File: wut.jpg (147KB, 726x590px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 726x590px

>>139609659
>They're not advocating fornkikking all the Jews
>fornkikking

>>139605931
t. revisionist historian

>>139605560
"You're a nazi."
Now I have a free pass to punch you.
See the issue?

File: 1501383008277.jpg (52KB, 552x496px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 552x496px

>>139605560
>2017
>thinking Nazis are real
Sounds like the plot to a 90s B movie

>>139607512
Thats false accusation tho, slander is a crime, people get sued for that shit.

>>139609912
>fly communist flags
>how dare they call me a commie

Piss off

>>139605931
If my grandpa had seen this pic he would have walked over and joined the Germans

>>139605560
>Killed all Nazis in 1945
>There are Nazis in 2017
>?????

>>139606834
Nice meme. It outlawed the CPUSA 63 years ago but didn't criminalize communist beliefs de jure.

File: 1503394333258.jpg (112KB, 953x960px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 953x960px

>oh poor me I was just being an innocent neo nazi

I swear to god alt right doesn't have any self awareness

>>139609659
Creating a white ethno-state will inevitably create a lot of violence, both against the non-choosen ethnicities already living in it and members of the choose ethicity that don't want that shit. Taken to its logical extreme, you'd either subjugate, exile, or kill them. You know that when you sign on for this fucking ideology.

Yeah, there are differences between white nationalists and 1930-40s Nazis, but not enough to make distinguishing them worth it.

>>139606834
>being proud that you're a domestic terrorist

I hope they start locking you alt right autists up and putting you on a watchlist

>killing mongols was fine in 1300
>punching fins is wrong in 2017
How do you rationalize this?

>>139609912
>le literally everybody who ascribes to communist beliefs is a le communist

>>139609602
>communism
>common

File: IMG_4716.jpg (90KB, 631x852px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 631x852px

>>139605560

Tbh Heil Hitler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktz3UATsOZ0

We should think of a name for delusional lefties who think that everyone is a Nazi, like McCarthyism (except McCarthy wasn't delusional). Who the big wig, should we say, encouraging the hystetia? Soros funding? Sorosism? (Although he was an independent Nazi collaborator...) Hillary? Hillaryism? CNN? CNNhysteria?

>>139607019
>the 14 words

Not that extreme, desu senpai. I don't understand the fear-mongering around that sentence.
Western Europe and North America import a shitload of extremely tribal people from backwards cultures, yet when a white person is vanilla tribal with the 14 words he/she has to be punched.

>>139605560
Going against Nazis was never fine. They are good guys, both in 1944 and 2017. You fell for another jewish fakenews

>>139610351
>haha punch a Starbucks

>>139605560
nazis were real in 1944. they're just a boogeyman now. or 90 year old men in some german old folks home

File: challenger fatty vs jew.jpg (127KB, 720x697px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 720x697px

>>139610439

>>139605560
1944 had actual nazis and not just opposition you brand that way so you can openly attack them without getting fucked up in the media.

File: 7d460f8be67c40950289493d1cf85130.png (967KB, 1000x967px) Image search: [Google]

967KB, 1000x967px

>>139605560
"Nazi" is a portmanteu of "National Socialist Party of German Workers Union", not an official name.

Because of the stupidity spread through our society, people mistake "Nazi" for an honest term and form definitions for it. The actual socialist movements, while retaining much in common with the National Socialist Party, hate "Nazis" soley due to this definition they have given them. What we called Nazis then sure as hell aren't what we call Nazis now.

Also, very very few of these idiots can actually throw a punch, hence their need for weapons.

So why, pray tell, are you advocating for violence you can't physically accomplish yourself against an undefined group of people and going through a mental labyrinth to try and link it all back to WWII?

File: hqdefault.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

>>139605560

Because those Nazi's were German. These Nazi's are American. And Americans don't get to legally punch other Americans in the face for having a belief system.
Furthermore, it's a dangerous precedent to set being the left has a habit of calling anyone who disagrees with them a Nazi. Making it perfectly okay to punch anyone in the face they disagree with right? Wrong.

>>139605560
turns out the nazis were the good guys.

File: REEEE.jpg (79KB, 764x443px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 764x443px

>>139612292
FUCKING FURFAGS GET OFF MY BOARD

File: bruder-you-killed-me.jpg (118KB, 768x960px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 768x960px

>>139612455
> turns out the nazis were the good guys.
Oh and THIS.
I just wonder if our golden generation would have been so eager if they'd had the gift of foretelling the future that was to come. Hindsight is not too pretty.

>>139605560
Dear Nigger,

Fighting Nazis in Germany between 1933 and 1945 was an act of moral heroism.
Given their negligible numbers and nonexistent power, fighting Nazis in America in 2017 is an act of moral onanism.

>>139605560
>normalfags think they have the balls to kill me

Hahahaha. I'd gut your family and make you watch you silly little lemming.

File: 1502376414848.jpg (15KB, 454x417px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 454x417px

>>139605560
We weren't killing them because they were nazis. We were killing them because they were the army of a declared enemy country. They could've been hari krishnas, we still would have killed them.

>>139605560
yeah your memes suck. thread.

Just offering a normie's opinion on someone who doesn't care for Hitler or Nazis. Liberals or progressives are using the term Nazi as whimsically as racists and it becomes overplayed, I'm technically a Nazi because I support every race's right to see their own kind want to excel including whites, and I'm a Hapa.
Also, these corporate globalists are smart, they've attached a policy of open border policies that benefit them almost exclusively, and if you disagree, you COULD be interpreted as racist, xenophobic or a Nazi.

File: 1372317273741.jpg (132KB, 636x500px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 636x500px

>>139612567
I can't really yiff in hell when hell is already upon us all.

File: cringe.png (51KB, 407x114px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 407x114px

>>139613640
GO BACK TO THE 2000'S YOU ANIMAL-FUCKING DEGENERATE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Yo4bgTFM9k

>>139605560
Rules of Engagement you kike shill faggot. Even in declared war shooting an unarmed, unresisting soldier was a crime. You Antifaggots would be looking at charges even in Germany.

You want to get this started, punching as many Nazis as you want? Just officially declare the war started. We're waiting.

>>139614368
I dunno mate, you seem trapped in the 2000s yourself.
>Caps lock is cruise control for cool!

File: OurValues.png (2MB, 1150x2136px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1150x2136px

>>139605560
The answer is that it's only okay to kill non-American citizens for geopolitical reasons.
It was never okay to kill people who you think are nazis.

WW II Nazis declared themselves as such and went out to wage genocide.


Today, folks who aren't Nazis are being labeled as such which the labelers then feel (wrongly) justified in committing acts of ferocity.

File: 1478968169667.jpg (4KB, 237x212px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 237x212px

>>139614991
>Not realizing that it's an ironic phrase

>>139605560
>>Killing nazis was fine in 1944
do you mean killing nazi soldiers?

It was never "fine" to shoot civilians

>>Punching nazis isn't fine in 2017

You mean "nazis", because they are not literal nazis, and they have no institutional power. Also white supremacy != white nationalism != neo-nazism != nazism

>>139605560
Back in the 40's, "nazi" didn't mean "everyone who disagrees with me" like you faggots think it does now.
KYS

File: n8umjWj.png (3KB, 698x1284px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 698x1284px

>>139616299
Jesus Christ man, pull yourself together.

>>139605560

probably because nazis in 2017 aren't in a military invading other countries

(other than the neo-nazis who are apart of the american military then I guess its ok to kill them TAKBIR)

>>139605560
>2017 not national socialist

>>139605560
Being a right-winger doesn't make you Nazi.

>>139609912
Sounds like something a fucking commie would say

>>139607235
This cuts them too deep.

Considering how multicultural /pol/ is, we should just scream "YOURE FUCKING WHITE" at antifa whenever they try to do shit

>>139605560
it was okay to kill niggers too. retard.

>>139605560
You know what? Nazism or even fascism don't even come close to the devastation that communism has wrought. We ought to #punchacommie

>>139605560

Nazi in 1944 = People on the opposing side of actual legitimately declared bloody warfare.

Nazi in 2017 = Anyone I feel doesn't adequately felate me for my virtuous political posturing on social media.

File: 1480232853570.png (297KB, 600x660px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 600x660px

>>139616615
>Capslock is cruise control for cool
>not ironic
Sort yourself out

german nazis weren't american citizens with the right to free speech, and oh btw were OPENLY AT WAR WITH US

>>139605560
It was never fine to kill Nazis.

>>139605560
It wasnt ok to kill civvy nazis in 1944