Why doesn't facebook just outright donate 2 million to the

eat a dick, dick

>>139482171
>Why do companies behave like they behave
This board is 18+.

>>139482641
It's a thought, not my personal misunderstanding bud.

>>139482171
>>139482171
>kikebook pulls a kike stunt
social media is pure cancer and i just outright refuse to interact with it in any way beyond using stalkscan. facebook can't just be a "good" company. part of their agenda seems to be to get its users involved in the virtue signalling themselves, so that fb feels less like a platform/company engaging in a tokenistic and detached act of charity and more like a place with a groundswell of morally righteous people. less a company that does good, and more just a place of good, or at least, a place that makes people feel good about themselves (zuck seems intent on exploring ways to influence the mood and emotion of fb users and it's fucking autistic and creepy as fuck). if all users engage in the tokenistic (and inevitably public) act of giving, then it all seems more 'authentic'

>>139483906
Yeah obviously, my point though is that with little effort we can generate a slight amount of bad press; in my opinion the best way to fight companies is to make it difficult at every turn possible, for the least amount of effort possible.

Since kikebook is in bed with the deep state how do we know these donations are even going to help anyone and just won't line the coffers of the clinton foundation just like Haiti back in 2010.