This thread is for the discussion of viable options for boyc

KYS

>>139465489
>duckduckgo
>emphasizes protecting searchers' privacy
You don't spend too much time on /g/ ain't you?

up

>>139465489
Replace duckduck go with ixquick or startpage it gets the results from google through a proxy

>>139466103

Why even bother posting this if you aren't going to explain anything. Of course I don't spend time on /g/ because I'm not a huge faggot.

>>139465489
Youtube isnt profitable for google. They lose money trying to host it.

>>139466103
It doesn't matter, they're not a silicon valley tycoon trying to do to the internet what john davison rockefeller did in the oil business a hundred years ago.

The focus here is to replace google, you can use whatever search engine that suits you best. DuckduckGo is just similar to google in some ways, it was a suggestion.

>>139466332
Great suggestion. Gonna check that out later.

yandex has a decent image search.

No youtube replacement that I can see as yet. vidme's EULA is just as bad so I don't see a point

These threads are important

>>139466431
They will lose more money if you don't use it

>>139466431
They will have competition when the cost of hosting video goes down to the point it's profitable, but I fear not before then.

>>139466915
I don't see how. The more bandwidth you use the more they lose.

Social Media:
https://www.minds.com/ (also a pateron alternative)
https://gab.ai/
https://wrongthink.net/

Email:
https://mail.protonmail.com/

Youtube alternatives:
https://www.bitchute.com/
https://vid.me/

Browsers:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/
https://www.brave.com/
http://www.palemoon.org/
https://www.waterfoxproject.org/

Search Engines
https://duckduckgo.com/
https://www.bing.com/
https://www.ixquick.com/ | https://www.startpage.com/ (same search engine, different URL)

When it comes to beating Googles new Youtube censorship, just report every single video you watch.

>>139467273
Why not create an extension or bot for that?

>>139467273
This. Those faggots have a bunch of "down to earth" libtards running it. Overwhelm them and force out shit auto algorithms. Watch as creators leave

>>139465489
What about mobile?

Is there anything viable outside of Android and iOS?

>>139467701
You could get b& for that

>>139467273
Not really practical without a plugin or script to distribute botnet style

File: image.jpg (109KB, 640x840px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 640x840px

>>139467886
Not sure about andriod but for applefags pic related

>>139468117
You could get b7s for over-reporting as it is. It needs to be more widespread and random

>>139467886
You can use android without Google. I've done it on a tablet

>>139468507
>Proxies
>Multiple accounts
>PROFIT

I've been running this script with AdNauseum.

https://jsfiddle.net/codefag/3t9r045q/

Watching the lost shekels mount up has been entertaining.

>>139466601
BitChute

>>139469126
more like BitchUte

>>139467701
>>139468260
I can do this, just give me some time I guess.

Bump.

I'm collecting some of your ideas and creating pastas. Next thread I'm gonna post some of them in the first posts of the thread.

File: 1488846378355.jpg (33KB, 632x454px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 632x454px

The real problem is there's no viable right-leaning tech alternatives. We need our own people getting into this sort of thing, but good luck starting up, since we all know who controls the money that makes these sorts of things happen.

>>139465489
>Deleted Windows 10 off my PC; installed Linux Mint (don't play video games)
>Use StartPage as my SE
>Use SeaMonkey as browser
>Use AdNauseam
Now there is the issue of my phone. The hook-nosed fucks have a legit monopoly on the industry.

>>139470197
there doesn't need to be
Google wasn't left-leaning, it got crooked to the left by its managerial units, and people within are getting counterbalanced by leaning slightly right than they were before, even if they were bleeding heart retards, they're now less than they were before.
It's an interesting mechanic in HR, policies tend to be counter-balanced no matter where they lean

>>139470211
Consider using custom ROMS, or, if you don't care about the security posture of your phone, root your phone and customize it to your liking.

>>139470841
So...basically everyone is going full-guns for the wrong target. When one individual fucks over 10's of millions, that person needs a come to Jesus meeting in the digital world.

>>139470197
Eh, I don't want another agenda-driven service. I want free speech, privacy, and due process

https://www.waterfoxproject.org/
waterfox + adnauseum + duckduckgo.
Don't use reg Firefox. They went full SJW

>>139471508
I was using Brave but its too unstable on Windows desktop.

>Brave or EpicPrivacy Browser
>Yandex

the good news: everyone is moving away from Goliath

>>139471786
You think it will be enough to damage them though?

Can someone make a step by step thing on how to change the default search engine on smartphones and desktops from google to another search engine on firefox/chrome/brave/etc?

Also, divided by operational system like Android/iOS/etc.

It's quite easy and intuitive, but people would be willing to do it more often when presented with an easy guide

The advault in adnauseum worked once for me then completely stopped working. Is this normal?

yacy.net

YaCy is a free search engine that anyone can use to build a search portal for their intranet or to help search the public internet. When contributing to the world-wide peer network, the scale of YaCy is limited only by the number of users in the world and can index billions of web pages. It is fully decentralized, all users of the search engine network are equal, the network does not store user search requests and it is not possible for anyone to censor the content of the shared index. We want to achieve freedom of information through a free, distributed web search which is powered by the world's users

>>139472050
one thing will never be enough when the attacks are coming from different places. the only way to combat such an assault is with a Phalanx.

>>139472050
1 person can run this overnight and get around $1000

This thread alone has 20 posters, assuming 30 more lurking, we have 50 persons in this thread alone running it

Several threads over the day at different timezones, estimate we have 200 anons running this over 1 night: $200,000

Over 1 week: $1,400,000

Over 1 month: $5,600,000

Assuming other boards are on it making 3 times the effort, over 1 month: $16,800,000

If we get more people to run it, this will multiply, if we gain traction and double the users: approx $30,000,000 per month of damage in the second month

In the third month we double the user base again: $60,000,000

Over three months we made a $100,000,000 dent in Goolag's bank account, that is one hundred million in three months.

That is if this movement gains traction and continues to grow. Notice the ungodly amount of shills on this thread. They know it works, and they are trying as hard as they can to dampen this growth.

$100,000,000 in three months. Probably a lot more if more anons join in. This movement requires everyone to be onboard.

Ignore the shills. Stop worrying. Just run it while you sleep. Costs you nothing.

We can do this.

>>139472526
I'm looking for some websites that could explain how to do that, but google unironically prevents you from finding a good one.

Some websites explaining that would be even easier for people to do it and won't require a huge explaining all of that. Let's brainstorm and create a pasta on how to change your search engine on all major browsers that are out there.

>>139472994
You have a script? I would assume you have to be actively browsing for it to work? I already have ad naseum installed.

>>139467273
this wouldn't work, each report also contains the account/ip address of the one who submitted it. after a few false reports the system would know to just ignore you.

What about Android?

Google even has access to our smartphone's microphone

>>139472598
Is there a direct link to the advault in firefox? That's how I access the options menu as well. I know the advault isn't some essential thing, I just want to have a laugh.

>>139467886
https://www.neowin.net/news/sony-helps-and-encourages-developers-to-install-linux-on-their-phones

I will switch when any of these options are superior.
They are not, they are cumbersome and do not return the greatest variety and accuracy of results.
I take convenience over protest. Show me the solution that comes anywhere close to the google suite of services and I will happily switch.

File: charmin_mod2_sensitive_06242010_B002KHNL5C.jpg (34KB, 445x391px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 445x391px

>>139473833
here ya' go pumpkin. this should help with some of the pain, suffering and tenderness. Now, go ask mommy for some tendies

>>139473557
Nice, time I start embracing Linux and ditch android.

>>139473549
>Firefox
Trying to avoid google while using a compromised browser

>>139474168
keep pissing into the wind
this is a fight you will not win

File: Cropped_Headshot_March 29.jpg (495KB, 1625x1625px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1625x1625px

Don't fall for the AdNauseam meme. It's a dud, and it's a Trojan horse. If you already used it, you wasted your time: Google doesn't lose a cent. Yes, Google refunds money. But none of that money comes from Google's own pocket. It's the money paid by advertisers in advance: part of it is simply returned for fake traffic, most of which comes from competitors attacking each other. Now, who takes the hit? Small site owners whose ads you're targeting. Google loves punishing them for "bad traffic", when some asshole simply click-spammed them. On the other hand, Google turns a blind eye on big kike sites like major news outlets.

Don't underestimate the ad industry kikes. They'll just come up with more sophisticated, sly and Jewish kinds of ads that will fuck up your internet space even more. Google won't suffer, major kike sites won't suffer, but small NEET-owned sites will. Don't be an ass, let the little guy earn his cent. All ads are geared towards normies anyway, not you.

AdNauseam claims that its goal is to protect you from surveillance. That's a totally false premise and a lie. There's nothing easier than to stop getting tracked: all tracking is done through cookies and associated accounts. Just don't stay logged in to your Google account and use the private/incognito mode. Or use cookie cleaners. As simple as that, you're not tracked anymore. The real goal of AdNauseam is to push its agenda. And it pretty much exposes you, too.

The creators of AdNauseam are literally SJW Marxist Jewish homos and trannies, this is not an exaggeration. You're basically taking part in kike wars and serving as a voluntary promoter of a yet unannounced product. It's their agenda, their 4D chess. Now, what happens when AdNauseam clicks on ads for you? Your IP address, the whole information about your location is passed down there. You're not only not saved from surveillance, you're being surveilled on repeat. Do your math.

This is the "woman" behind AdNauseam, Helen Nissenbaum.

>>139473833
The point is stop supporting google. If you refuse to stop it, then google grows stronger and all the others you should be supporting stay the way they are right now.

Remember when facebook destroyed windows live messenger even though it didn't have all the cool features like custom gifs and etc?
That's what's going on right now, google is destroying every other options without being innovative just because it had collected the widest library over the years in terms of videos and etc.

Also, this is not about the service per se, it's about free speech. Google either stop doing what they're doing or they are going to be replaced.

>>139474487
Keep bumping the thread shill, you're also welcome here

>>139465489
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jlQosiA6Hk

>>139474382
I've been using firefox for ages desu, ain't gonna change that.

>>139474487
show flag pls

>>139468796
unfortunately you are just costing some asshole running advertisements money, not Google

>>139474875
use waterfox then it's firefox without the soros funding and sending your data to third parties

>>139476347
He can now run offline local campaigns and have a more diverse strategy if he doesn't already, we might be helping people grow.

>>139477192
all you're doing is making google money, they just pass this onto the sucker buying ad space

>>139477269
Sometimes there are innocent casualties in war, it's just an unfortunate part of it's nature.

>>139469126
Most Unis don't allow P2P on their wifi.

This caused a shitstorm when WOW was popular. They also block TPB. Reason? "Security" but the real reason is piracy of textbooks and research papers probably.

>>139466431
this used to be the case but youtube makes them a lot of shekels now

File: Google Script5.jpg (158KB, 744x501px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 744x501px

>>139472994
With the script, you can get more like $3000-$8000 overnight, depending on if you set it to click on non-tracking ads, also. Probably best to leave those alone. Also, AdNauseum just uses the internet average of $1.58 per click to estimate, but the script targets keywords with an average of about $205 each.

jsfiddle.net/codefag/3t9r045q/

BTW, like many people, I have noticed that AdNauseum has stopped collecting/clicking ads when I am in Incognito mode. I don't know if this is something new, but in the FAQ of AdNaus, it specifically says that it does not collect or click ads when you are in InCognito.

File: fed.jpg (79KB, 615x439px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 615x439px

Doesn't using this allow (((Google))) to track me with much more ease? Yes, I'm feeding them useless data, but they can still see in which websites I've been.

File: Google Script4.jpg (154KB, 802x505px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 802x505px

>>139473312
jsfiddle.net/codefag/3t9r045q/

Also, a /g/fag has made a couple more keywords lists (you would just replace the var keywordURI )

Here is one for >100 cpc per anon's request, this one has 5,505 terms
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/anonymous/48dc7d2790c38086b2c67c84b10e66d3/raw/a57ae58f61023a6e9ee3535744a2632d5d0f6f68/gistfile1.txt

CPC keywords >$200 (652 terms)
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/anonymous/e2cce2ce92f2a64913ff34e623860b36/raw/d2600878621f921ed719c0c31969e0cacc79ec0c/gistfile1.txt

Also, a more modified script, opens only a single window with 1 minute cooldown, also reads keywords from cpc greater than $200

https://jsfiddle.net/icefrogcode/kqdx7cyb/

>>139479655
Disable it unless you are running the script (which will be nothing like your typical browsing habits), if that is a concern. It also saves you from having to whitelist all of the pages you normally visit. Though, if you set it not to click non-tracking ads, you don't harm "decent" advertising.

File: 1503791453878.jpg (82KB, 576x1024px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 576x1024px

I tried this then half the image links here and on plebbit and voat stopped working. Wat do?

>>139480819
Also I tried adding the domains commonly used at those places to the whitelist, still no dice.

>>139466332
I thought that's what DDG did?

>>139470211
>>139470911
Android, some models, right now is objectively the only thing you can get almost 'clean'. You still must use cell service which is monitored like a mofo.
You can beat this with linux and proxies/vpn, but most people won't do the work necessary to get linux clean.
By the time you are rooting/romming, you're pretty damned far down the tech rabbit hole.

File: 1503928455139m.jpg (66KB, 293x1024px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 293x1024px

>>139466601
Dtube on Steemit and also BitChute are blowing up right now and going to wreck jewtubes shit

Don't we even generate more money using AdNauseum for google?

I really wish brave had 4chanx

>>139482051
no, google ends up having to refund it and advertisers lose trust

don't have time to read entire thread, can I use ad nauseum with brave? I'm sick of googles shit.

>>139482164
how do they detect it?

>>139482426
too many clicks from one ip address on a single page

>>139472994
>Over three months we can make a $100,000,000 dent in Goolag's bank account, that is one hundred million in three months.
>dent
Google gets revenue when you click ads, they don't lose money. This is literally the most stupid idea I have ever seen here, you people need to stop and think

>>139483118
when you click ads that are BS they have to give the money back, and they lose advertisers/customers faith.

Check your Straya and think.

>>139483254
Source?

>>139483118
You're a fucking simpleton. It corrupts the integrity of their entire ad model.

>>139466402
This is the only acceptable response. I think duckduckgo is a datamining POS and even I will admit anyone who browses /g/ for more than 10 minutes probably has a dragon dildo up his ass.

>>139465489
Adnauseum needs to be a virus to be effective.
I dont visit normie sites.

>being this new to the "forbidden fruit" marketing ploy that you forgot to hide that your owner is an sjw tranny

File: maxresdefault.jpg (27KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1440x1080px

>>139465489
>Eich
I have a bad feeling about this, anon...

>>139483254
>>139483424
A few percentage points of difference in the ad fraud rate is not going to lead to them giving back any considerable amount of money

Do you think businesses WANT to advertise on Google? They are locked in worse than us and don't really have a choice. Google has a monopoly on the ad platforms and if they don't advertise there their competitors will. Even if the fraud rate doubles businesses will just have to bend over and keep paying or face corporate irrelevancy. In the meantime, $$$ for Google.

>>139483254
The owner is definitely not getting any of that ad revenue.

>>139465489
For some reason I started seeing ads on youtube with Ublock origin installed. So I switched to AdNauseam today and no longer see them. Also the whitelisting is easier for adNauseam. If you use the whitelisting for sites you support then it's awesome.

>>139483118
>>139483411
Do you really think google would've banned the extension for chrome if it didn't cause harm to them?
By your logic they'd be loving it because they'd end up having more clicks, but it turns out that out of all those clicks NO ONE ends up buying anything from the ads that were clicked when it comes to the statistics they make. Like, millions of clicks and no buyers or downloads or whatever. Just clicks. And then google has to give back all the money used for the advertising, since the companies paying them up eventually find out that the ads didn't bring any results at all.
Source
https://adnauseam.io/free-adnauseam.html

File: sculpt.jpg (1MB, 3200x2400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3200x2400px

>>139465489
Bump

>>139477269
They can buy adspace elsewhere. Used with the whitelist it puts right and left sites on an even playing field at least. If users don't like what's being supported by the ads then they can punish the milquetoast advertisers and reward them for what they do like.

Sites with channels like bitchute and yourube need to let users choose to view ads on a per channel basis. AdNauseam's whitelist lets you do this on a per site basis.

>>139484119
Please dont install this app that gives your entire browsing history and user agent info to us... Its forbidden fruit pls no

>>139465489
Qwant, startpage and searx are the best options for search engines.

>>139484119
Google banned the extension because they had to appear to be "doing something"
I bet they would have kept it there if they could get away with it

Most advertisers will keep paying Google though even with higher fraud rates, because a) many companies see clicks as positive even without good conversation rates (also some sites don't have good ways to quickly measure conversion e.g. political messages). and b) advertisers have almost no choice in the matter

>>139484609
The default should be no ads. Then users can reward channels by choosing to view ads.

I need to look into getting Brave onto the linux package managers

File: Top.jpg (321KB, 1890x1340px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 1890x1340px

Here it is boys, from privacytools.io

>>139483794
This pissing in an ocean of piss argument, though defeatist, is not an unreasonable one. Obviously, uasing AdNaus plus the scripts will need to gain traction outside of /pol/, /g/, and /leftypol/. And, using AdNauseum solo, would need to become somewhat popular with normies.

>>139465489
i started using google again just so adnauseam can fuck them over

i hear they're having to repay ad revenue to the ad purchasers, we need lots of that

>>139467273
Yes if they have to check manually the reporting system will cost too much

You have to mask your ip use different devices and various public wifi

>>139485157
>recommending people Sorosfox
>not waterfox
nigga

https://prism-break.org/en/categories/android/
https://www.privacytools.io/

>>139485403
yeah they repaid like 6% or something, big fucking deal

>>139484802
What you're describing is irrelevant to the cause, they came up with unreasonable excuses for banning the extention just as they did when they banned free speech on google search and youtube. They can't win through reasonable arguments, so they always shut it down for unethical reasons. That's the main point in fighting against them.

>>139484616
>Please dont install this app that gives your entire browsing history and user agent info to us...
You're talking about chrome, right? I already unistalled that, it's cool.

>>139485319
>This pissing in an ocean of piss argument, though defeatist, is not an unreasonable one.
Of course it's unreasonable, we've already done a lot in the last few days. If you don't want to do anything then just fuck off and stop supporting the cause, this thread is for the ones that actually want to do something about it. I mean no disrespect, but if you want to discourage people with this nihilistic sense of helplessness then you're in the wrong place m8

File: ad rev.png (8KB, 676x79px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 676x79px

>>139467273
REEE MY AD REVENUE

>>139485614
I don't like firefox neither. They fired their own CEO for being anti-faggot marriage and they sided with Soros. I just copied and pasted from privacytools.io. And it remains a fact that they have the best plugins yet, so, there is that.

>>139485718
the extension clearly violated their terms of service, it's not a matter of free speech

>>139466915
Use YouTube with ad block on. Make them lose as revenue while still taking up their bandwidth.

>>139466332
This

Duck duck go is compromised, Startpage is much better

>>139485954
>the extension clearly violated their terms of service, it's not a matter of free speech
So you're admitting that they are getting harmed by the extension, aren't you?
Just like all the videos they banned on youtube also violate their "terms of service", and promote "hate". Great argument, m8.

They shut down whatever they want because all their terms are vaguely described, so they can always use them as a joker excuse for shutting down anything they want. And this is wrong.

If you wanna see what's hurting them you just need to look at what they're shutting down, they wouldn't do it otherwise.

>>139486118
Doesn't everyone do that anyway?

An anon posted this a few weeks ago:


Install a Firefox derivative which has stripped out the SJW nonsense such as Waterfox + ublock Origin + uMatrix + Smart HTTPS + Decentraleyes + BetterPrivacy + Privacy Settings + Self-Destructing Cookies + Canvas Defender + Click&Clean

Then, strip out the Google connection — Type "about:config" in the url bar, search for "safebrows". Disable everything you can. Also, delete all the url entries you see on the right side.

Then, block ads and trackers before they even get to your pc — Modify your HOSTS file.
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm

That combination is how you defeat ads and trackers and SJWfox. Furthermore, use ProtonMail for email. Use searx.com or qwant.com for searches. For complete privacy, consider using a VPN such as PrivateInternetAccess.

>>139473343
Block Your ip and don't login
Use various public wifi so you don't always have the same ip

>>139486384
>(((ID: AovkDTtn)))
You're taking an unwise path. If your meme flag is genuine, please reconsider. If it is not.
Go away Helen.
G
O
A
W
A
Y

>>139486488
A lot of people, but not everyone. Its a major reason why Google runs negative when hosting YouTube. But If we can get more and more people using ad block, they will lose more and more money while hosting it.

>>139474782
Hey where did you get a picture of me

>>139465489
Also good extensions to use:
>Disconnect
>NoScript (if you know how to use it)

The alternatives to gmail:
>Protonmail
>Tutanota

The alternative to Google hangouts:
>Wire (best option)
>Signal
>Telegram

The alternatives to Twitter and Google+
>Diaspora
>Mastodon
>Gab.ai
>Hell even facebook and twitter (not recommended)

The alternatives to android
>iOS
>???????

Opensource android permission manager (adnauseum for android):
>Xprivacy (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=biz.bokhorst.xprivacy.installer&hl=de)

Tell me about more Google products we need to boycott.

>>139486736
What the hell is this post supposed to be?
I'm OP, go back to r*ddit

File: Capture.png (418KB, 1355x667px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1355x667px

>>139478820
>Most Unis don't allow P2P on their wifi.
Can't they just run a VPN?

>>139472994
pic related

>>139486384
no, the extension doesn't harm them in the slightest, but not removing it harms their reputation

and they didn't ban videos for violating terms of service, they banned videos they didn't agree with. that's why we're unhappy. most of these videos demonstrably meet all the terms of service.

>>139481363
I use and old phone with no Sim card on wifi

>>139485718
I was doing this 3 weeks, ago, kiddo. Was one of the primary testers of the script.

>>139486748
I always wondered why google just didn't make a blanket add coverage for all videos or something. For example just tell advertisers that, if they want to advertise on youtube, then their adds will be featured on all videos regardless of content.
Would something like that have worked?

File: small child.png (41KB, 1897x119px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1897x119px

>>139487072

What a cute little baby. Stand aside while the real proxy warriors come through

After you get to 40k+ in your ad vault, the extension starts fucking up btw, to fix it, you just need to click "reset to defaults".

What will happen is it will show ads being found, but it won't click them.

>>139474331
>>139473557
>https://www.neowin.net/news/sony-helps-and-encourages-developers-to-install-linux-on-their-phones
It's just their modified kernels. Won't work

>>139487015
It's a warning.
You've fallen into a NYU/TAU/CIA/Mossad botnet.
You now encourage others to do the same.
You ought to be more detailed in your reasearch.

>>139487144
They don't want conservative YouTubers to make money

File: adnauseam.jpg (39KB, 426x359px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 426x359px

>adNoseum

>>139487535
so what? It's kikes trying to jew other jews.

What the devs are hoping for is probably a sweet deal like (((adblock plus))) gets.

>>139465489
Waterfox turns off Mozilla telemetry, I've been using that, though every non Google search engine seems to be trash, I'll try duckduckgo

>>139467273
This

>>139487101
>no, the extension doesn't harm them in the slightest, but not removing it harms their reputation
And hurting their reputation isn't our goal?
Come on, read the thread over

>and they didn't ban videos for violating terms of service, they banned videos they didn't agree with.

Then why all videos were banned under the premise that they violated their terms? That they were "hateful" or whatever?
Your post makes no sense

>>139487134
Then stop discouraging people, what keeps you from that?

>>139487376
I don't know what you're talking about, but here's your (You)
Keep bumping the thread with your bullshit pls

>>139486934
Only alternative to twitter and google+ is zeronet! It can't be shutdown!

>>139487430
They really made a bad mistake here. They're a private company that would reduce potential profits for some political correctness bullshit. Even left leaning youtubers are getting fire because they're not "left" enough.

>>139487818
You will soon. The sad thing is, so will all the anons who listened to you.

Good thing you're all disposable.

i got 93 dollarydoos already, where can i go that has a lot of ads

>>139487936
go look up lawyers, dentists, and credit repair companies on google.

File: Captura de Tela 2017-08-29 às 13.11.53.png (157KB, 1169x506px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1169x506px

>>139486934
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=In4XGgVr7xQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4tL3Yfy18c

>>139487307
Nice. That is the highest total I have seen. Previous was $15K+

>>139487880
(((shilling intensifies)))

(((You)))

What if we make a list of videos and report everyone reports them
I vote for queen kid stuff
The last 10 views posted

>>139467273
Report every video and say there is something racist or anti semetic or Nazi towards the end. They will have to go through and check if they are flooded with reports they will eventually either flag everything out of laziness it be buried in work. We also need to do the same thing on Facebook, and script what we can

>>139488069
You have to report a specific time in the video now, they look around that time for a few seconds.

>>139487818
I take it that english isn't your first language? you don't seem to understand this very well

the extension only helps google, it doesn't harm them. just because they couldn't be seen to host the extension on their official site doesn't mean it doesn't benefit them.

videos were removed for violations of nebulous "community standards", not for breaching terms of service. there's an important difference

>>139488037
The only response a shill has is to repeat shill {AdNauseum}
GO AWAY HELEN

>>139488173
What if you get a large group of people to report all parts of the video?

>>139465489
... I haven't used google in ages, other then. nah I use bing for that. I use them to stream music on youtube. duckduckgo and bing both use google bots to get their results though. the only difference is google shares information, but even though duckduckgo doesn't, it doesn't mean they aren't just as biased as google in their results. I user aol.ainly, and bing (but only bing for the "past 24 hours" button.) aol also uses google, but they are also a media sourceso they have their own bias which makes differing results. I wouldn't of even known this site if a youtuber hadn't browsed it. the best sites are the ones you get from actual people. let people be your engine. ask reap people for answers, don't be reliant on the internet for all of your knowledge.

>>139488246
Look that up
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_YouTube

>>139488323
???
Anyway, keep bumping man

>>139474875
>>139476422
Firefox is FOSS, you don't set it to send your data around, ti won't

>>139484896
Yeah, it's pretty shit experience. The whole browser is unfinished.

>>139485614
>>139485803
Mozilla foundation are cucks, but Firefox' code is clean

Now we just need a smartphone alternative, though an android without gapps is working great so far

>>139488013
I mean there was some good alternatives with plasma mobile and Ubuntu phone, guys at Purism are saying they're gonna make it run PureOS, but it all feels like it won't work. You can't buy a phone with these OSes preinstalled. That's the issue.

>>139488421
>bing
Literally as jew as Google or worse. Use DuckDuckGo. They have some legal obligations to not track you an not make money off of it. That's what the positive thing about DuckDuckGo. You're making Jewgle bleed money.

>>139488246
>YouTube's Terms of Service prohibit the posting of videos which violate copyrights or depict pornography, illegal acts, gratuitous violence, or hate speech. User-posted videos that violate such terms may be removed and replaced with a message stating: "This video is no longer available because its content violated YouTube's Terms of Service".[3]

I think you've never watched a video that have been shut down, you'd clearly remember this message when they explain why they did it. It does say it's their terms of service.

I'm the one thinking english isn't your first language, maybe you're chinese or something and you're already used to censorship on the internet. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

File: 1489242101043.jpg (35KB, 252x252px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 252x252px

>>139465489

Maybe if we all report the first 10 videos on a specific search term

Eg trans kids

>>139489432
Actually that's good, target hyper sensitive groups who will throw a giant hissyfit.

>>139489162
Bing is fine too. The whole point is to get enough people off google to restart actual competition, not to find the perfect solution.

>>139467166
Mozilla is SJW central. What are you on about?

>>139467166
Email:
https://tutanota.com/

Browser Plugins:
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
https://disconnect.me/freeprotection
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock#installation
https://adnauseam.io/

>>139465535
>>139465647
bumping for KYS

File: 1497289400630.gif (156KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 540x304px

>>139465489
operation: Google is kill

>>139482865
This is bad. It needs to hide better.

Also ADsense needs to make ADsense+ and start selling shilling clicks through it. Capitalistic dogs destroying relevance of AD clicks themselves and paying for it...

File: saturn-sigil.png (13KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 220x220px

>>139488606
I'm bumping these threads for the yous, dig it?

Cognitive dissonance is leading you astray, but it may lead other anon's astray from your strayed path, back towards the good, or, physically corrected so to speak.

OP is a Judas goat. Prove me wrong.

>>139465489
Brave works like shit for me for some reason. I'm sticking to firefox for now because pale moon looks like shit.

File: TMN_logo[1].gif (10KB, 234x206px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 234x206px

>>139491751
Ad to your list
TrackMeNot http://www.cs.nyu.edu/trackmenot/index.html

>>139467166
waterfox is garbage written by a 16 year old.

>>139465535
NYS

File: assad lion.jpg (120KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 720x960px

1) is brave available for Brave?
2) any way to configure Brave's usability? Seems like a good browser, but I can't hate how keyboard shortcuts don't seem to work right. For instance, I can ctrl+page-up to the next tab, but it doesn't "focus" on that tab and I can't scroll/backspace/anything until I've reached back to my mouse to click the tab and make it "active". This makes it a huge pain in the ass to browse multiple tabs.

Why does iridium never get posted in these threads? I find it an excellent alternative to chrome

>>139467166
add Vivaldi to the browser list

File: banks.jpg (4MB, 8000x5583px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 8000x5583px

>>139467273
Dude, you're finally back.

Just so you know, you have an imposer: !oCbrgLyIyM

Keep it handy for when people question you.

Stay frosty.

>people unironically shill for Brave
Their business model is literally selling your data to advertisers, are you all fucking retarded?

>>139495420
Vivaldi is a much better browser than Brave, and it even has built in capture tools that every /pol/ user should like.

File: 1503704183821.png (805KB, 801x936px) Image search: [Google]

805KB, 801x936px

>>139472994

>>139496292
Okay, I'll check that out. Does it have the ability to use adnauseum?

>>139466915
They'll lose even more money if you use it with AdNauseam

>>139496292
Vivaldi is proprietary and last time I checked they did not even bother disabling Google trackers.

>>139469126

BitChute will never catch on among normies/young teens/or the average person like YouTube does. Like it or not, that's extremelu important.

What's great about YouTube (or I guess used to be), is that ANY person could stumble across a Jared Taylor video, or Stefan Molyenux, or gateways to redpills like Paul Joseph Watson, Sargon of Akkad, or Lauren Southern.

If you have something like BitChute, which seems like it would mainly attract just a bunch of right wing people... it doesn't serve a purpose other than being a right wing safe space.

You simply won't have a bunch of normies stumbling across those right wing videos the way they could on YouTube.

File: adnauseam_vault.png (1MB, 2050x1398px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2050x1398px

>>139465489
Kikes have infiltrated both sides.

Pic related, it's from the AdNauseam website. The devs are clearly from Israel.

>>139465489

DuckDuckGo's search result quality sucks from what I've experienced.

StartPage is better. It's supposed to be Google search results, but filtered through a proxy so you stay anonymous, although despite being pretty decent, I noticed they're not always exactly the same as when you search the same word(s) on Google.

>>139469588
If you're legit you should try and make an addon of sorts that is easy enough for anyone to use

>>139496905
The important thing is that it's hurting google, turn their guns on them

How the fuck do you adjust the contrast of the page? It is fucking dark and I can't read the text at the timeline

>>139486497
yes doing this turns back time to 1995 on muh P1 Pentium

>>139496912
It's because googles attuned to StartPage's data rather than your own. So when you search on StartPage it gives results based on what the server was googling prior.

>>139479593
any way to get that revenue relocated to muh bitcoin address? asking for a friend.