>there's going to be a USS Donald Trump on our lifetime
what have we done?
Trump will be the next class of carriers.
>>139435934
Something great.
>>139436019
Gold-plated and 7 times larger than the largest carriers
>>139435934
There might not be. He won't be remembered well.
>>139435934
If it's an FTL capable starship, we'll have truly succeeded.
>>139435934
Holy fuck I can't wait. If they don't encode all their messages using his tweets I'll be disappointed
>>139435934
The nuclear codes are 1488l33tf4gg0t
USS Donald J. Trump, name on the transom in gold leaf, motto: "Grab Her by the Pussy"
>>139435934
Serious question, are there ships named after Nixon?
>>139435934
>Trump putting his name on something
Wow, what a suuurpriiise
>>139436144
4 u
>>139435934
Carriers are outdated technology.
When we start making a new technology weapons platform (orbiting carriers?), we'll have to go back to the tradition of naming them after President's and name the first one The Donald Trump
he fights the ayyyylmaos
>2020 year of the American Civil War
The USS Trump nukes the Bay Area after they let the North Korean expeditionary force land there for a beachhead.
>>139436635
No. We only name Supercarriers and one super top secret submarine after US presidents. We attempt to maintain 11 supercarriers in operation, and by tradition one of those is exclusively named the Enterprise (ie. when we phased out the old supercarrier Enterprise we immediately slotted the next Supercarrier to begin construction to be named the Enterprise). We have the Lincoln, Roosevelt, Truman, Reagan, H.W. Bush, Washington, then we named one after an admiral, Nimitz, one after a congressman, Vinson, and one after a senator, Stennis. Up and coming is the new Ford (president), followed by the Kennedy (president) and then Enterprise (like previously explained)
Navy vet here. I'd fucking re-enlist to be a member of that crew.
>>139435934
I don't think so