>race does not exist
>what is whiteness
>whites as a group are not real
>you cannot have white only countries or workplaces
wat.
i am legitmately curious what kind of response these people have to this massive inconsistency. what does it matter if poland is 99% white if race does not matter, does not exist, and neither do whites as a group. what if the white only ethno state identifies as trans black. can they even say anything at that point?
Whiteness is alleged to be a harmful social construct that everyone has a moral imperative to dismantle.
While race doesn't technically exist, the perception of it exists and the most effective way to eliminate this destructive perception is first to marginalize and then get rid of white people who have been the main aggressors in recent history.
When there are no longer any people who are "visibly" white, the towering structure of oppression is supposed to come tumbling down and give way to a brown communist utopia.
This is how I understand it.
It goes without saying that there are quite a lot of errors in theserror beliefs.
The one I've seen the least mention of is the liklihood that new mixed race peoples will diverge into distinct ethnic groups because of the sheer number of people in the world and that expectations for any thing close to a homogenous race with a population of several billion is not realistic.
>>139398963
generally how i've understood it as well. whiteness is anything orderly wholesome and sustainable.
>>139397361
>all races are equal
>but whites are privileged
>all races are equal
>but diversity is a strength