so one of the arguments against race mixing with high IQ black

i have yet to see a debunking of the flynn effect which makes the iq argument a pretty silly one

>>139367390
stop your yapping and give sauce, nigger

This dumb bitch put her headphone cord right over a possibly hot burner. DROPPED.

>>139367878
Sofia Tesfu

>>139368012
maybe they relly are genetically dumber

>>139367390
Stop being an autistic dipshit and breed with the best woman you can find.

File: 1503844757982.jpg (72KB, 958x960px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 958x960px

>>139367390
>racemixing

>>139368481
the best woman I found doesn't want to breed with me

>>139367390
I just had to shitpost

File: 1501229812496.jpg (83KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1000x666px

>>139368123
thx m8

>>139367390
Regression to the mean is a short term phenomena. Sustained breeding efforts would fix the problem, although it's likely to be unnecessary step back.

File: The girl just knows....jpg (329KB, 1200x1492px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1200x1492px

>>139367390

>>139368757
>feet tattoos
horrible taste

>>139368585
>Ugly + Ugly = Ugly children
who could've thought

>>139367390
The argument against race-mixing even with the best of partners is that your children will not have a national identity.

>>139368678
Then become a better person (read: increase you sexual market value) and find someone better than her.

>>139367680
Basic knowledge of how the world works.
Intelligence will always be necessary and high skill/intelligence jobs will never be done by low skill/incapable/incompetent people.
Rather, low skill jobs will be replaced with automation and low skill/low intelligence people will live on welfare or die out if a meritocracy has its way.

>>139367390
>high IQ
>black women

Pick one, nigger

>>139368994
>feet tattoos
>horrible taste
eh, i'd still bury my face in that ass

>>139367390
>>139368757
wanted to puff those feet until i saw the tattoos

>>139369001
depends on the context

the Chinese government is homogenizing China through mixing of the Han chinese with Uyghurs (who are already 60% caucasian so it's race mixing), Tibetans and other ethnicities to strenghtify China's national identity

>>139369498
They do it on an ethnic level though.
They aren't introducing wildly different races to promote "diversity", rather they're promoting homogeneity and seek to do something not unlike the United States did in the first half of the 20th century.
The US's immigration policies prior to 1965 was that of a European Caucasian ethnostate. It had one caveat though, immigrants were to abandon much of their former ways of life and adopt the "American Culture".

>>139367390
Jesus. How much flammable shit can that girl put on that stove? She is hot though.

>>139369872
that ain't what China is doing, that's just Civic Nationalism restricted to a certain region of the world

>>139367680
Flynn effect isn't on g. Flynn himself acknowledges this in his presentations on the subject, Flynn effect isn't us becoming smarter its us getting "more modern" (his words).

IQ is just a proxy for g, and there are many proxies, from SAT scores to reaction time. IQ scores have risen, but that hasnt been reflected by a similar rise in the other proxies, which leads to the conclusion the Flynn effect isn't g-loaded. The difference in racial ability, however, IS a reflection of g, and the more g-loaded the test the more pronounced the differences.

regression to the mean is not that simple. For example, if said black woman is high IQ, and all her family members are also high IQ, including her brothers, maternal and paternal uncles and aunts, grandparents, etc., then chances there is a strong and persistent genetic component to her intelligence. On the other hand, if she is successful, but her brothers and sisters are morons, delinquents, etc, you are indeed taking a risk by having kids with her. Regression to the mean is definitely a concern, but it gets abused a lot around here. Indians(from the subcontinent, not Amerindians) have an IQ or 80-85 or something like that. Indian Americans have an IQ of like 110. Obviously the rich Indians we import here are not going to have 85 IQ street-shitters when they have kids, because through immigration screening we have selectively ensured that the Indian population here is a genetically very intelligent group.

File: jiggle3.gif (3MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 360x202px

>>139367878

>>139370243
Whites in America are typically 100% European Caucasian, but they generally aren't above 50% of any particular European ethnicity, like English, French, German etc.
This helps create a stronger identity when looking at the White population in the US.
It wasn't just about leaving parts of culture behind, but even one's ethnicity as well.
It's very rare to hear an American complain about their children dating a "fucking mick" or "fucking kraut", because that's barrier was left behind, now the General barriers tend to be race and juxtaposed cultures. Obviously these barriers should be maintained.

What China is doing is very comparable to what the US did in the beginning of the 20th century.

>>139369073
What is a high enough IQ to not worry about being displaced? 120? 130? Higher?

>>139367680
Take the average joe from 2000 years ago, and you will appear more intelligent than him whether it be problem solving, puzzles, etc. The same works the other way around if someone from the year 4000 came here. They will appear smarter than the average joe today.

>>139370976
I understand that and I actually see White American as an ethnicity and not just "mutts", but that's still not what China is doing, it would only be the same if China was taking in Korean and Japanese immigrants while having politics to integrate them

>>139367390
what do female feet smell like?

>>139368862

Kek.

>>139369001
tell this to paraguay

>>139367680
>her iq is low but at least its increasing over the long term so i might as well race mix and have my childrens iq be lower than if i didnt race mix

makes sense

OP oversimplifies, belying an insufficient IQ. IQ mixing predicts the kid's IQ will be about the average of the parents', all other things being equal.

But regression to the racial mean is also an observed effect, so they can both be going on at once. Why is there regression to the racial mean? Let's say there are some very persistent characteristics like brain size. If you get a black with a 120 IQ, they have a super high performing brain for its size, but it's still black size. The super high performing part may not be so persistent in children, but the size will be. It's a ceiling that the children can't break through, but that they'll probably fall farther below.

>>139370810
Has your assertion been tested? It sounds reasonable but it could be false.

File: surrounded.jpg (375KB, 1222x987px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1222x987px

>>139368862
Surrounded by nigging nigs she gonne be racist af

>>139367390
High IQ nonwhites are anomalies you need to understand genetics better. Your kids IQ is definately not the avearage of you and your partner. Its more like the average betwenn you and all your a ancestors + her and all her ancestors. By picking a race with a low iq to mate with, you are putting a lot of shit genes in your pool with lots of chances to draw poorly

>>139367390
>so one of the arguments against race mixing with high IQ black women is the regression to the mean, but doesn't that go against the race realism standpoint?
qt nigresses won't fuck me anyway so this is academic navelgazing

>>139367390
>so one of the arguments against race mixing with high IQ black women is the regression to the mean, but doesn't that go against the race realism standpoint?
The children would regress to the family mean. The family mean among blacks is 85.

>also has anyone debunked the Flynn Effect?
Yes.

>>139379034
if the kids iq regresses to the family mean, and the mother has an 120 IQ, wouldn't that mean the mean of her family is high as well?

why would her child be dumb?

by that logic american poos would be all dumb, yet they have high IQs and high-paying jobs

>>139381609
poos are different, they have more distinct castes which have not interbred with the lower ones for centuries. Higher IQ poos have a high mean, they aren't anomalous. Get it?

>>139367390
yeah regression to the mean only applies over one generation, but there is more of a spiritual reason to not racemixing. You want your children to have roots and identity--there's not much identity in not looking like your father or your mother.

>>139368994
hahahaha keeping it real man!

>>139381609
>if the kids iq regresses to the family mean, and the mother has an 120 IQ, wouldn't that mean the mean of her family is high as well?
Usually. It's like how short parents can sometimes get tall kids.

>>139372529
My dick

>>139367390
post more examples of portuguese black women.

>>139381609
>why would her child be dumb?
If the rest of her family is the typical 85 IQ blacks then the kids IQ would likely regress downwards.

File: hapa.jpg (49KB, 481x609px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 481x609px

>>139367390
Sometimes they become pic related,but most of the times they look like rob schneider

>>139386077
why didn't her IQ regress downward if she's the mean of all her ancestors too?

>>139386299
She won the genetic lottery, anon.

File: 691664.jpg (296KB, 1254x1600px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1254x1600px

>>139367390
>regression to the mean says 2 high IQ parents will probably have an offspring with average IQ, so shouldn't the next generation of that population have average IQ as well?

>>139386299
If her family is intelligent then it's because over generations her family line selected for intelligence.

>>139386630
then what's wrong with racemixing with her?

>>139386715
Because you want kids that look like you, because you want to keep Europe white, etc.

>>139386299
random stuff happens. no two people are identical.

>>139386858
is it better to have dumb white children or smart mixed children?

>>139367390
Holy shit, this conversation's premise is retarded. Broad categories like "blacks" and "white" are shit. Road mega categories like this are retarded.

Natural selection works on a very local level. Igbo Nigerians are high IQ because they have a precolonial history of engaging in complex trade.

A high IQ black person is not necessary an an anomaly their particular ethnic group or their family line could be high IQ. I have an Ethiopian friend who's dad is very successful and both he and his brothers are smart as hell too.

Broad and meaningless words like "black" and "white" are now obsolete in light of population genetics. For instance, Khoisan, Bantus, Ethiopians, and Nilotes are all "black" but they are wildly different and many individuals from these groups haven't shared a gene pool in tens of thousands of years.

>>139387165
If you want a white antion the dumb white children are better. A civic nationalist would think that having smart mixed-kids would be better, but that ideology ever succeeding IRL is a pipedream.

>>139387424
*Road
Broad

>>139387424
>Igbo Nigerians are high IQ because they have a precolonial history of engaging in complex trade.
Source? I've heard this before, but any source yet is suspect.

>>139387424
Fuck I'm phoneposting, forgive typos

>>139376470
Heidi Koalburner Klum?

>>139387424
>Broad categories like "blacks" and "white" are shit.
I agree, but it's pretty much the only thing we have in terms of data right now.

Also, I wouldn't want niggers here even if they were smart. I'm not one of those who thinks IQ is everything.

File: Finally+i+didn+t+miss+the+exterminatus+_523a4229ab74edf7108b2eaf358c6894.png (47KB, 131x326px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 131x326px

Let's just get the Warhappa 40K future going. It's what's going to happen anyway. Whites and Asians, world Exterminatus champions since 2045.

>>139387603
I don't know of any IQ data per say but there is plenty of circumstantial evidence in terms of test scores, academic achievement, and income. Here is a decent write up:

>http://www.unz.com/pfrost/the-jews-of-west-africa/

I wouldn't be surprised if they were 100 on average or close to it.

File: 1503942597646.jpg (127KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1000x1000px

>>139387430
Gets it. IQ is a force multiplier, but if your community stops functioning because of the Putnam effect, it doesn't matter.

>>139367390
race mixing is bad because it destroys ethnic and cultural homogeinity and thus also social trust
it creates conflicted humans without a strong identity

>>139388374
>I wouldn't be surprised if they were 100 on average or close to it.
Eh, smarter than the average Nigerian but 100? I'd bet money that it's closer to 90.

File: 8078920.jpg (54KB, 460x575px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 460x575px

>>139388430

>>139368585
That's not an ugly child, that's fetal alcohol syndrome.

Mommy drank while preggers.

>>139387424
People still don't realize that the retarded members of each race historically outbreed the intelligent.

>>139368855
Indeed.
The problem is even if you do produce an uplifted mulatto child, odds are in a quest for "authenticity" she's just going to wind up getting knocked up by the noggiest hoodrat that she can find, undoing everything and sending your posterity's prospects on a one way trip to darkytown. You're not just fighting the genes but cultural pressures as well if you breed black.
>Two steps forward
>One step back
>Two steps back
And that's the Jig-aboo Jig!

>>139368757
brrrrrrrraaaaaaaaapppp

>>139388863
I mean it's anecdotal but I have two Igbo buddies. Once is a chemical engineer, and the other literally doubled majored in computer engineering+Math. The third one I know tripled majored in 3 insane majors.

Remember, there is more to human variation than IQ. Igbos prob have high test like other west africans. I've seen some have nigga moments amongst each other at times. Nevertheless, I'm almost positive their IQ isn't too far from 100

File: Abdul Kaepernick.jpg (22KB, 340x290px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 340x290px

>>139388768
>race mixing
>it destroys ethnic and cultural homogeinity
Race mixing can create an ethnic group and a cultural chaos
Arabs for example are a product of race mixing
Arabs are mulattoes basically and their culture means chaos and destruction

>>139389757
*three buddies

File: image.jpg (21KB, 275x228px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 275x228px

>so one of the arguments against race mixing with high IQ black women is the regression to the mean, but doesn't that go against the race realism standpoint

Africans are the result of Eurasians admixing with apes in Africa 1.1mil years ago. It isn't a matter of regression to the mean - genetics doesn't work that way.

Every person has 21 autosomal chromosomes that fully recombine, and 2 sexual chromosomes that only recombine in certain very, very small portions. On those 21 autosomes, you have two alleles - one from your mother and one from your father.

Among the genes in the human genome, one is called 'MCPH1' and controls brain size. The gene has many alleles, and there's about a dozen ways to have microcephaly - but you have to be a homozygote for the microcephaly-causing allele to express microcephaly;

Blacks are admixed too;

>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcephalin
>Microcephalin (MCPH1) is a gene that is expressed during fetal brain development. Certain mutations in MCPH1, when homozygous, cause primary microcephaly—a severely diminished brain
>A derived form of MCPH1 called haplogroup D appeared about 37,000 years ago (any time between 14,000 and 60,000 years ago) and has spread to become the most common form of microcephalin throughout the world except Sub-Saharan Africa
>Haplogroup D may have originated from a lineage separated from modern humans approximately 1.1 million years ago and later introgressed into humans

Let's get technical;

>https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs2442513

Orange is AA, green is AC, and blue is CC. The three letter codes can be read here;

>https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Help_(population_diversity)

YRI, LWK and MKK are all African populations, and ASW is the acronym for American blacks.

>>139389757
Nigerian-Americans are self selected and probably above 100

>>139387430
Why we don't burn the rice

>>139390160
>Africans are the result of Eurasians admixing with apes in Africa 1.1mil years ago.
dropped.

>Haplogroup D may have originated from a lineage separated from modern humans approximately 1.1 million years ago and later introgressed into humans
This doesn't support your ludicrous opener.

File: image.jpg (66KB, 642x371px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 642x371px

>>139390160

If you look at the pic, you can see that CC only exists in Africans.

Only homozygotic Africans express microcephaly, but the point is that the CC homozygote genotype only exists in African populations. The low IQ's of every sub-Saharan African country is the evidence required to prove that blacks are clinically retarded, and that the C allele is associated with low IQ - as you can see, AC is also almost entirely limited to the African populations.

>regression to the mean says 2 high IQ parents will probably have an offspring with average IQ

It you have two AC heterozygotes (The most likely combination of White Male + Black Female) they're likely to produce more AC heterozygotes - but also AA and CC homozygotes.

If an AA homozygote breeds with an AC heterozygote, this is what you mean by 'regression to the mean' because it produces AC heterozygotic children.

'The mean' is a delusion that hides the fact that very plain eugenics can improve mankind.

>>139368862
why would kids wear high heals. for fuck sake.

File: 85725.webm (183KB, 500x256px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 500x256px

>>139389757
> I have two Igbo buddies
I have two Hollywood Stars buddies and I have two Lamborghinis in my garage in my penthouse in Beverly Hills

>>139392766
Again, I noted that it's anecdotal. But plenty of other evidence like test scores, academic achievement, average income also supports my point.

File: image.jpg (25KB, 300x204px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 300x204px

>>139390864

>dropped

So you ignored my citations? Stay ignorant.

>This doesn't support your ludicrous opener

AA macrocephalic homozygotes branched off from the rest of humanity 1.1 million years ago. This allele is what causes modern brain size. As in, it's the missing piece that made us human - a modern human CC homozygote displays a brain size close to H. erectus.

Modern humans have existed outside of Africa for longer than 37,000 years ago, which was when sub-saharan Africans were created. Also, they propose that exact scenario in the paper;

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635020/
>>Furthermore, the worldwide frequency distribution of the D allele, exceptionally high outside of Africa but low in sub-Saharan Africa (29), suggests, but does not necessitate, admixture with an archaic Eurasian population

So yeah, humans came from Asia, and blacks are mixed with apes.

> high IQ black women

lol

File: adrian-the mist.png (255KB, 365x405px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 365x405px

>>139389825
>three buddies
four buddies

>>139368862
May she not burn the coal, after all, there is a very strict CARBON TAX.

>>139376470
absolute disgutsing

File: tenor.gif (794KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

794KB, 320x240px

>>139392967
Yeah... whatever you say...

File: shot_922_editorial_008.jpg (160KB, 1624x2440px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1624x2440px

>>139369001
>your children will not have a national identity
>implying this is a bad thing
globalism is inevitable. we will never advance as a species until we stop our petty infighting. racemixing is to the betterment of mankind as a whole. no niggers though.

>>139367390
My god she is a fucking goddess

>>139393960


brainlet here. how would this account for native australians?

>>139367390
Even if a nigger SOMEHOW has a 100+ IQ, mixing with one is creating a spawn who is still more susceptible to heart disease and sickle cell, as well as other negative hereditary traits.

>>139367390
Lol not even her natural hair. Look at her ugly kinky hair when it it's natural.

>>139391812
>If an AA homozygote breeds with an AC heterozygote, this is what you mean by 'regression to the mean' because it produces AC heterozygotic children.

bump requesting more info.

File: 4 hours.webm (3MB, 1310x576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1310x576px

>>139367390
Cool, it's another "what is wrong with racemixing thread? Let me post nigger porn with my 100 different IPs" and it of course doesn't get deleted by mods again.

We just had 20 of those threads today.

Nice.

Fuck this degenerate, controlled Jew shit website. 8/pol/ is hundred times better.

Why is the fact that socioeconomic factors play a big role in IQ measurements, always rejected on here. It's like a redpill nobody wants to take.

>>139398902
then fuck off to 8/pol/ faggot, this ain't your hugbox safespace

>>139399106
wat

that literally doesnt occur wtf

>>139398902
no, it's a thread about IQ differences in races

>>139396774

OK, so;

1: Eurasians are 1.1mil years old,

2: Every single European Y-haplogroup (I, J, R and N) is descended from Y-haplogroup F;

>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707640956
>Like haplogroup C, haplogroup F therefore appears to have an origin in the south—in particular, in Melanesia

Basically, Australian aborigines are proto-humans right at the cusp of humanity. Sub-saharan Africans are like inbred pit dogs - as low as their IQ may be, they're very aggressive and violent, whereas Abos are far more well-rounded and docile. We evolved from Abos, not blacks.

More citations in a second...

>>139399106

because we've heard it 1000 times and it's starting to sound like bunk.

>>139367390
>regression to the mean says 2 high IQ parents will probably have an offspring with average IQ

When two humans create a baby, there are now three humans. That's what changes the average of the population. It is no indication of the offspring's traits. Averages apply to populations. No individual has an average.

>>139399579

so you claim that out-of-africa is incorrect?

>>139399305
But it's been documented, literally. Take a nigger orphan from the African shithole were they come from and give them an education and they end up being as smart as their peers.

>>139399589
Sure.
>Diagnosing these artifacts suggests a nil hypothesis: East Asian, White, and Black adoptees raised in the same environment would have similar IQs, hinting at a minimal role for genes in racial IQ differences.
www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/1/1/pdf

File: 1488724966657.png (10KB, 250x202px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 250x202px

>>139400140
>>Diagnosing these artifacts suggests a nil hypothesis: East Asian, White, and Black adoptees raised in the same environment would have similar IQs, hinting at a minimal role for genes in racial IQ differences.

i dunno man. that's hard to believe.

If you breed outside your race you bring shame upon your family. It really is that simple.

File: doggo.png (471KB, 560x672px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 560x672px

>>139367390
regression to the mean is a property of normal distributions of ANYTHING. It's just a mathematical property. If something is beyond the mean in either direction, the next thing is more likely to be closer to the mean. That's just the property of normally distributed numbers. OP i hope you read this because you were too lazy to do a 2 second good search

>>139399106
Inhibiting factors like malnutrition do not come close to equaling innate capacity. It's like complaining that the reason your riding lawn mower isn't as fast as a Ferrari is because your mower isn't as aerodynamic. The percentage increase in intelligence from eliminating all inhibiting factors would not even be close to the natural range between the high and low ends of human intelligence. Socioeconomic factors only correlate to intelligence because being retarded makes it hard for you to succeed, not the other way around.

my interest in the subject stems not from racism or any desire to feel superior, but noticing that the constant education/media/pop culture narrative does not match up with the reality i observe.

i don't (and won't) hate anyone, but don't fucking lie to me.

is this bitch supposed to be black or mixed.... because she definitely isnt black.... she got that white girl face

>>139367390
The only thing wrong with race mixing is I am not doing that with her right now.

>>139399106
because when human outcomes are adjusted for IQ, then people of various socioeconomic backgrounds do similar.

File: image.jpg (90KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 960x720px

>>139399579
>>139398575

So, to back up my claim, Mungo man was mtDNA-haplogroup V3c;

>http://m.pnas.org/content/113/25/6892.full
>The haplogroups observed for WLH4 were S2 and V3c

Mungo man or 'WLH4' was examined on two occssions - both revealed the same form of V3c, but different branches of S2. So, the 'native' mtDNA-haplogroup of Australia is a contaminant, while V3c (Found today in northern Scandinavia) is the true haplogroup.

This means basically that the modern Saami and Mungo man came from the same maternal line. The question then becomes how the Saami got from Australia.

Curiously, native Australians, northern Europeans and north-west native Americans have the highest concentrations of A-type blood;

>http://anthro.palomar.edu/vary/vary_3.htm
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type_distribution_by_country

We find concentrations in;

Norway = 40%
Portugal = 39%
Finnland = 38%
Turkey = 37%
Germany = 37%
Sweden = 37%
Denmark = 37%
Switzerland - 37%

File: images.png (11KB, 218x232px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 218x232px

>>139367390
>high IQ black
top kek

>>139400631
I was talking about the usage of regression to the mean in race mixing debates

>>139368012
That's a gas range you fucking retard.

>>139401003

thanks for the info but your ID is all over the place. why?

>>139400880
she's Eritrean so she'sprobably at least 50% Western Eurasian (arab)

>>139392967
>academic achievement
What achievement? How many scientists have the Igbos produced compared to Europeans?

File: image.jpg (101KB, 500x694px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 500x694px

>>139400110

Basically, yes. The youngest font of humanity came from Africa, and many European groups have African alleles, but we don't all have African heritage (Yet.)

>>139400838

>i don't (and won't) hate anyone, but don't fucking lie to me

This. I will never get over the fact that people thought they had to lie to me to get me to treat blacks like people. That lack of trust makes me never want to put my hand out to (((them))) again.

>>139401003

Y-Haplogroup I1 is common in all these countries - specifically in Baltic Germany and Scandinavia, where A+ blood reaches it's highest concentrations. In the countries where O+ blood is least common (Finland and Switzerland) I1 is common, and A+ is the most common bloodtype. In fact, I1 and A+ blood are the only commonalities between Finland and Switzerland. Thus;

Bloodtype A+ = Y-Haplogroup I1.

While R1b may seem more attractive as the candidate Y-haplogroup for A+ due to Portugal, an R1b-centered nativity for A+ wouldn't explain how Norway has the highest concentration of A+. R1b-U105 is common in Norway, Finland, Denmark, Germany and Switzerland, but critically abscent from Turkey and without strong concentrations in Finland, Portugal, the Carpathian basin and Switzerland. R1b-U152 lacks any concentration in Finland, but does concentrate in Portugal and Germany - but not, critically, in Baltic Germany.

I1 is concentrated in all regions, but abscent from modern Australian aboriginees - supposedly. Y Haplogroups I and R1b1, supposedly from admixture, are found among native Australians;

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2917718/#!po=32.8947
>Previous analysis of AuR mtDNA11,12 showed that 37 individuals are likely to have ancient Australian maternal origin with deep-rooting mtDNA lineages (haplogroups M42a and b, P4b and S1a), with one mtDNA of probable European origin (haplogroup U5).
>However, five of these Y chromosomes clearly fall into European haplogroups (R1b1 and I)

>>139401112
It's the same thing, you mong.

The concept is that every unit you move away from the mean in any biological property your offspring becomes more likely to be closer to the mean than you were. THATS IT.

Very tall people are more likely to have taller children than the average. However, as you move more towards the tall end of the distribution, your child is "more likely" to be less tall than you.

File: rachel_cook3.jpg (110KB, 621x1000px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 621x1000px

>>139390710
Never. White women are the best looking anyway.

>>139396089
No. Exterminationism is the only way forward.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-28-18-58-43.png (481KB, 600x1024px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 600x1024px

>>139367390
Im a sissy boy, no stds, will suck cock and balls for free all day.
You can breed with me instead desu, why bother with women?

>>139400497
Okay, make your own study to counter it.

>>139400140
We can already predict academic success from genes alone. The nurture-only side of the debate has been completely BTFO a long time ago.

>>139368757
>>139367390
>go to /pol/
>always find threads with hot black chicks

Every time. Thx /pol/. :-)

>>139402448
Proof?

>>139402394
>>139402536

i don't need a study to know that you're full of shit.

File: image.jpg (190KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1136x640px

>>139401195

No idea.

>>139401850

If S, H, V, U, R1b and I were all native to Australia, then Europe appears to be a truncated version of Australian mtDNA and Y diversity, and Australia appears to be a gene pool where H, V, U, R1b and I went extinct. This would also explain why type A blood is common in Australian natives. If Y-haplogroup I was present in ancient Australia and migrated to Europe, this would explain the geographic distribution of bloodtype A - R1b is also present in north America, where type A blood is also found at high frequency. Since Y-haplogroup I is upstream of R1b1, this implies that the last common ancestor of I and R possessed 'Europoid' characteristics - this would explain Mungo man's gracility. That ancestor is IJK, and since Y-haplogroups G and H are present in populations with Europoid characteristics, the last common ancestor of G, H and IJK had to have Europoid characteristics - Y-haplogroup GHIJK.

Coincidently, GHIJK, the descendent of F, has never been found in any living male or any remains. F came out of Africa 70,000 years ago, and the absence of GHIJK implies that all it's descendents outbred it, everywhere on the planet. The geographic spread of bloodtype A+ probably displays the spread of the Europoid phenotype by around 50,000 years ago. This is also the strongest evidence that bloodtype A+ is associated with Y-haplogroups R1b1 and I, and mt-haplogroups H, S, V and U.

As well, Ammianus Marcellinus cites Timagenes when he claims that the Gauls came from "islands and lands beyond the Rhine" - which could mean Britain, Ireland, Scandinavia or perhaps Iceland. It could also mean that the Gauls came from the south, up along the west African coast - which is covered with R1b individuals. As well, the Celts believed themselves to be descended from the Dioscorti - a pair of twins who came up out of the ocean.

File: 1489588372278.jpg (79KB, 394x395px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 394x395px

>>139367390
>High IQ
>Black
>Women

This is pretty funny desu senpai

For those interested...
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000226

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-20 at 8.58.56 PM.png (217KB, 1600x835px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1600x835px

>>139402536
>https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jul/23/genes-influence-academic-ability-across-all-subjects-latest-study-shows
>The researchers analysed genetic data and GCSE scores from 12,500 twins, about half of whom were identical.

>Results in all subjects, including maths, science, art and humanities, were highly heritable, with genes explaining a bigger proportion of the differences between children (54-65%) than environmental factors, such as school and family combined (14-21%), which were shared by the twins.


This one is interesting too:

http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/08/17/176511
>Gene-based analyses found 536 genes significantly associated with general cognitive function; many were highly expressed in the brain, and associated with neurogenesis and dendrite gene sets. Genetic association results predicted up to 4% of general cognitive function variance in independent samples. There was significant genetic overlap between general cognitive function and information processing speed, as well as many health variables including longevity.

More and more genes are found every year, and I would bet my life on that the day someone decides to check the frequencies of those genes in differend ethnicities they will find that they are unequal.

>>139403499
Archive or screenshot please

>http://theguardian com/science/2015/jul/23/genes-influence-academic-ability-across-all-subjects-latest-study-shows
https://archive.is/ZjG3J

>>139402785

thanks for the info. you've gone over my layman head though.

do you believe that out-of-africa is/was a politically influenced theory or is the current research just not getting much press in the interest of being PC?

>>139401944
From 15-27. After that it's grandmaville

>>139403499
And a third one i missed:

Scientists predict academic achievement from DNA alone
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160719091622.htm
>The research shows that a genetic score comprising 20,000 DNA variants explains almost 10 per cent of the differences between children's educational attainment at the age of 16. DNA alone therefore provides a much better prediction of academic achievement than gender or even 'grit', a personality trait thought to measure perseverance and passion for long-term goals.

>Published today in Molecular Psychiatry, these findings mark a 'tipping point' in predicting academic achievement and could help with identifying children who are at greater risk of having learning difficulties.

>Previous research on twin studies has found that 60 per cent of differences between individuals' educational achievement are due to differences in DNA. Whilst this may seem far from the 10 per cent predicted in this study, the authors note that twin studies examine the sum total of all genetic effects, including common and rare variants, interactions between genes, and gene-environment interactions. Twin studies can therefore tell us the overall genetic influence on a trait in a population. Polygenic scores however estimate genetic influence from common variants only, which explains the discrepancy between these DNA-based studies and twin studies (10 per cent vs 60 per cent).

File: 1496276469871.jpg (67KB, 754x643px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 754x643px

>>139404042
37 years old

File: monthly racemixing threads.webm (3MB, 1318x822px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1318x822px

>>139367390