>Intelligence officials in South Korea suggested Monday that North Korea may be getting ready to host its sixth nuclear test
http://www.newsweek.com/north-korea-nuclear-test-soon-south-korea-655870
>If North Korea carries out a sixth nuclear test as expected, it is more likely than ever that the situation will cross the point of no return.
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1043950.shtml
>>139362095
Poor Kim, all he wanted was to steal the nuclear fire from the hwite man.
Nothing is going to happen if NK conducts another nuclear test. Not one thing is going to change except a few more radioactive chinks.
>>139362095
He want's nukes, we'll give him nukes.
FIRE AND FURY BITCHES
>>139362095
>the situation will cross the point of no return
we will pass the point where burgerland sits back and lets China and Russia deal with NK and we'll never return to sticking out hands in the east's hemisphere
>>139362095
Its a mess. Cant really do anything with them at this point. If you do a limited strike they lash out with everything they've got. If you leave them alone they become more capable. If you nuke the entire peninsula the whole world goes apeshit. No president since the fighting ended wanted to open up that can of worms. Even Trump does not want to deal with it.
Main problem is North Korea becoming the worlds wholesale supplier of nuclear weapons to whoever has the cash no questions asked. That to me is scarier than them actually using one themselves. Loose nukes. South Korea will feel compelled to develop its own nuclear weapons program as a counter along with Japan. Would North Korea having good relations with Iran supply them with knowledge, materials for a bomb or a functional weapon? How will Israel react? So many unknowns and possible outcomes.
>>139362095
We've crossed the "point of no return" five times already. Let the guy have nukes and offer him better trade deals than China does. Capitalism solves almost anything.
>>139363599
Say goodbye to all your samsung and japanese tech if USA attacks NK, NK will destroy SK with artillery and will nuke japan, probably could nuke california but i don't see it as an issue.
>>139365058
The range of their best artillery reaches just north of the city center. These are massive guns with slow rate of fire. Point being they are not going to destroy South Korea with artillery. Just damage Seoul which would be a disaster. The US Airforce would map targets and engage with various means easily. Also sending data to SK artillery batteries which are far more effective and accurate. It would not take long before North Korean artillery would be suppressed. The real problem is once you start a shooting war with North Korea, what is to stop them launching a plane over the border with a nuclear weapon onboard directly at Seoul.
But you are right about all production of gadgets being halted. Thats for sure. Mass evacuations via the railways to the south from the city. It would be a shitstorm.
>>139362095
>the situation will cross the point of no return
How many times have we already crossed the point of no return already? A dozen?
>Nuclear test
Wake me up when Drumpf and Kimmy grow some balls and start the real deal
>>139364389
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Orchard