Which political philosophies state that violence is not wrong

>>139350577
Niggerism

Philosophy is about understanding. The only time action is needed is when you must bring that understanding to the masses.

Instead of asking what philosophies justify fighting perhaps you must furst ask what is a philosophy worth fighting for.

>>139350577

Last time I checked revolutionary communism was pretty violent in its doctrine of reaching power.

People just cherry pick ideas to support their goals regardless of how inaccurate those ideas might be? Shocking.

>>139350851
There is a lot of philosophy books to read, spare me the lecture I have plenty of time to understand the whole spectrum. I'm just particularly interested in violence for now, after reading all the usual left wing philosophy telling me all authority is bad I want to read the opposite

>>139351131
Who are you talking to?

>>139350577
>that article

Christ almighty the content is even worse than the title.

>>139350577

Weinstein

File: dio come on.gif (639KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

639KB, 500x281px

>>139350577
>Chanda Prescod-Weinstein

fascism

>>139352379
Which one?

>>139352577
I was kind of hoping for someone who didn't get their doctorate out of a cereal box

File: IMG_0250.jpg (47KB, 537x720px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 537x720px

Bump

>>139350577
>Tried to google but it's just bringing up postmodern shit like Foucault rather than what I want to read
HA! Maybe it just means there are no such philosophies and that what you want is therefore wrong?

>>139357391
Or maybe googles algorithm sucks for anything that isn't a purchase

>>139350577
>Which political philosophies state that violence is not wrong and is the only way to achieve one's aims is by violence or the threat of violence?
Vague description but pragmatism, doesn't say you SHOULD do violence, but if that's what's needed than that's the best course of action and you should do it.