/pol/ like to say immigrants are because of low IQ and laziness but what about asians? compare to whites
>more educated
>more wealthy
>more entrepreneur
>less criminal
asian immigrant are beneficial. why dislike them?
>>139253058
They can do that in Asia. The west is ours.
>>139253058
Because even if they are superior, they are not us. Nobody wants to be replaced by strangers.
That being said, I think /pol/ is too hostile to east asians.
>>139253058
Cause I don't want Asian DNA replacing Polish DNA, simple as that.
>>139253058
No one really dislikes asians. If they didn't vote left they'd de great.
However, I want Europe to stay majority white, so not a chaance of excessive immigration.
>>139253580
ok that makes sense for poland but usa is immigrant country so we should take best immigrants possible. asians.
Most Asians are great people,
polite, hardworking, law-abiding.
Except the Chinese, they are subhuman,
No decency, morale, humanity
They would probably sell their own mother if they could.
>>139254233
Not quite, at inception the USA was made for and by the white man.
>>139253058
The funniest part is that just a century ago white people used have an average IQ of 70-80, if we were to apply the modern testing standards.
>>139254861
This. I don't see "Muramoto Takashi" anywhere here. Not that they aren't fine people, but stay in your country, nips.
>>139255796
>the people that started the industrial revolution were as smart as the average modern American negro or Brazilian
I don't think you though about this one at all.
>>139256165
The bulk of the population always consisted of idiot cattle. It was thanks to the efforts of a small number of remarkable individuals leading the way that things ever went anywhere.
>>139257040
>Flynn effect from 1900
Didn't they only start studying past 1930?