Why are >smart >well read >not beta people always right

File: illust_61537336_20170824_204131.png (150KB, 663x1076px)

150KB, 663x1076px

>>138975448
Made me think pretty hard

>>138975623
So you're pretty much posting that in every thread now, huh?

>>138975448
Chart has inaccuracies, fascism is by no way that far right.

>>138976093
I've run out of generic responses, and my other option is copy/pasting the OP and modifying phrases.
It doesn't help that I want to sleep right now.

>>138976093
>Chart has inaccuracies, fascism is by no way that far right.
The pure application of the Fascisma philosophy politically is right-wing as fuck.
It's pretty "free market", exept the govt has a veto on every fucking thing you do.

BUT, you can incorporate a kind of fascist principle in your govt, like NatSoc in Germany did.

Is Ultra-Anarchism like living in Mad Max?

>>138975448
I generally don't associate any of those qualities with libertarians.

Right wingers aren't very smart in general.

>>138976265
How it handles decentralisation of power is more left wing in general, just because it happens to sometimes have a brutish quality to it similar to something competitive or might makes right just means that branch of fascism is inconsistent.

>>138976359
More like converting to Jainism. You should try it.

File: 1497287092494.jpg (57KB, 540x542px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 540x542px

>>138975448

>>138976484
>Right wingers aren't very smart in general.
Time to kys

File: 1497285877592.jpg (155KB, 900x980px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 900x980px

>>138976606

>>138975448
whoever made this chart is a fucking idiot. There are multiple mistakes on there, and some are in the completely wrong quarters.

>>138975448
I'm smart, well-read and not a beta, and I'm not a right-wing libertarian. I'm something more like a fascist. Maybe a nationalist minarchist with strong morals.

>>138975448

Chart kinda sucks but to answer your question, a smart well-read libertarian has enough self awareness to understand that without personal responsibility and accountability a free society will not survive. He understands that logic must overcome emotion when dealing with others in his society. Just a hunch tho.

File: 1473275793750.jpg (594KB, 2001x2185px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 2001x2185px

>>138976656

>>138976484
>Right wingers aren't very smart in general.
>I don't know what right-wing means

>>138976484
Nicely argued, commie.

>>138976824
>whoever made this chart is a fucking idiot. There are multiple mistakes on there, and some are in the completely wrong quarters.
Nice arguments you've got there.

>>138976848
>nationalist minarchist with strong morals
Yeah, so a right wing libertarian.
Except you do not want a state to impose it on other people.

>>138975448
>Left-libertarianism
Doesn't exist and I hope this memes ends.

>>138978554
>Doesn't exist and I hope this memes ends.
While it is stupid and cannot work, much like anarcho communism, a lot of people are there.

Hippies.

>We shouldn't force anyone to do anything, or take anything from anyone, but the govt should pay for school, hospitals, etc.
It's fucking stupid and paradoxal.

>>138975448
Because you believe yourself to be smart, well read and not beta. Problably wrong on all counts.

>>138980339
Nice arguments there, leftist scum.

>>138978554
>>138978715
All of the original anarchists were left-libertarian, how does it not exist?

With Libertarian Capitalism should I use the ancap flag or the gadsden?

>>138980765
Look at the compass. There is a leap between libertarianism and anarchism.

They're far further south.

>>138980979
>With Libertarian Capitalism should I use the ancap flag or the gadsden?
Depends if you want a govt or not.

Right wing libertarianism today is more akin to Minarchy+liberty+capitalism than it is to anarchy+capitalism.

File: friedman.jpg (64KB, 280x396px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 280x396px

>>138975448
I don't know, you tell me :^)

>>138975448
>national socialism
>near communism
Did you make this shitty compass?

>>138981093
Thats just because the meaning of the word libertarianism has changed, it used to basically mean anarchist. So the term left-libertarian is to indicate the old meaning like the old meaning of liberal became classical liberal.

File: 1488841218874.jpg (201KB, 1000x900px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1000x900px

>>138976898

>>138981319
Well, can you argue against it?
Nationalism socialism is but a very authoritarian version of socialism, with the interest of the nation in mind.

It is deeply left wing, since it is against the free market and heavily regulated, and strongly authoritarian because it forces everyone to do as the govt pleases.

What are your arguments against this definition and categorization?

>>138981419
Correct, like the word "progressist", it used to be right-wing.

Because right wing it to "progress" where left wing is to "change".
But nowadays, thanks to America, the word "progressivism" is now liked to ultra-liberals.

>>138981480
>dems and reps
>right wing
Is this a meme made in the 90's?
With all the welfare, regulations, and socialist measures, those two are clearly on the left side of the border.

File: 1501037842961.jpg (39KB, 670x588px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 670x588px

>>138975448
What a tool

>>138981955
>I AM SILLY
Nice arguments.

File: download.jpg (7KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 225x225px

>>138982004
Capitalism only works in the public interest if it's contained within an ethical framework. Things like vigorous antitrust, ethical consumer and worker protections, and an economic model where private gains are reasonably enjoyed by workers as well as executives are not natural to capitalism (they are socialist devices), but we see them as important parts of a sustainable capitalist model. Without them, in the long run, only the financiers and owners in the economy profit from unbridled capitalism, and at the expense of a consumer class unable to leverage any political power to buttress the public interest.
Your move, dunce

>>138981647
National Socialism does not forcibly redistribute wealth like Communism (marxian socialism) does, nor does it consolidate everything under the state.
If National Socialism is like Communism then where does their privatization in the 1930s fall?

File: 14706672656549.jpg (19KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 480x360px

>>138982156
>Capitalism only works in the public interest if it's contained within an ethical framework.
In some extent, yes, this is why only blind people are AnCap.

With an AnCap system, we would end up in a Corporatocracy so fucking fast you wouldn't have time to say "I'm lovin' it" before being locked up.
This is why a minarchy with right wing libertarianist values is the best.

IMO.

File: 1501577738619.jpg (1008KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1008KB, 1536x2048px

>>138975448
>13 posts by this id out of 36
>zero substance, all OP autofellatio
Alt-right pseudos are the newest iteration of bronies. You guys ever wonder where the bronies all went, and where the newest wave of quirky self-assured beta tweens came from? I know multiple people from highschool who underwent this transition in the last 5 years after graduating. Makes perfect sense when you think about it:

Their fandom is unshakable, and ultimately serves as a communal attestation to their superior taste and sensibilities. It's less about the content or substance, and more about how identifying with - and feeling they belong to - an enlightened few makes them feel.

This accounts for why they're completely immune to reason, and perform staggering mental gymnastics to explain any factual incongruity with their orthodoxy. But ultimately, it's a superiority compex wrapped around an inferiority complex. I wonder what form this hilarious phenomenon will take next?

>>138982459
>no argument
Color me surprised.

>>138982345
>"decent points"
>"less government will fix the problems caused by deregulation and less government"
Why are you doing this to yourself op?

>>138982746
What flag do you fly, Anon?

>>138982345
>>138982156
You're both retarded. Every argument against capitalism that assumes a monopoly outside of highly obscure markets are false.
The private gains have been reasonably enjoyed by workers in every free-market society.
If you seriously think that granting the public sector a monopoly of force in order to prevent monopolies in the private sector and coerce business to give out what they deem "fair" wages, you're an idiot.

>>138975448
because they end up on top of the hierarchy which is naturally formed with ring wing libertarianism

File: 1503571780131m.jpg (66KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1024x768px

>>138982915
I'm a pragmatist
I know you'd prefer to stay memeing instead of arguing points, sorry about that. American lolbertarianism is cringy as fuck, a manufactured set of beliefs intended to make corporate oligarchy palatable through the guise of social liberalism. Look up the history of the libertarian movement since it got picked by the CATO institute et al as their favorite policy vehicle. It's as much a grassroots movement as the Heritage foundation

>>138975448
Questions mr smart wel rounded thinker.
How does a libertarian win against the marxist subversion? Not one libertarian has been able to give a good example yet.

Fascism should be basically next to communism, it's collectivist, believes in state ownership, state housing, Mussolini's party was even named "Partito Fascisto Repubblican" or so, which translates to "Party of Republican Fascists". So it's pretty much same

File: 1502929708987.jpg (60KB, 358x437px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 358x437px

>>138983360
Forceful opinions lad, must mean you know what you're talking about :^]
Look at the US today - record corporate profitability and stock market gains. Meanwhile, wages and individual purchasing power have stagnated for decades. And it's rich hearing you talk out of your ass decrying antitrust and federal wage laws. Name one country with no anti-monopoly or minimum pay laws that shows companies don't take advantage of workers and consumers with no regard for the nation's long term interest as a consumer-driven economy. Take your time

>>138983683
Do you think we need government institutions in order to remove the people who's in direct opposition, and poses a threat to our norms and way of life?
In order to maintain a society of absolute property rights, you have to take care of the once intolerant of this main value, this, as most goals, is perfectly achievable with social ends, or when they start posing a real threat to our societies main value, its a breach of law.
You don't need taxes to incentivise against and stop marxism.

File: 19faa43b1d23ebc60e16407967919df0.png (1MB, 2000x2000px)

1MB, 2000x2000px

>>138981480
>Post-scarcity bait
That's funny.

>>138977841
activism is authoritarian that's also not a political ideology, same goes for statism, progressivism isn't right wing especially with traditionalism in the same quarter
you're chart a shit

>>138975448
fascism is left wing, idiot
learn history

>>138986562
>fascism is left wing, idiot
Nice arguments.

>>138984160
I'll give you the corporate profitability and wages, although it is largely influenced by outside factors, such as immigration and the US being a mess both racially and culturally.
Purchasing power has mostly to do with taxes and government restrictions. Norway have a higher GDP per capita than the US, yet the citizens have less purchasing power, and less in savings (I believe the average savings in Norway was something like 0 and 20,000 dollars in the us)
As for anti-trust laws, you're assuming that the profit-seeking involved in business only goes one way, that only the capitalists are interested in making money. In reality, within a competitive environment, the workers will try just as hard to increase their profits as the capitalist would. It's also incoherent to think that one party could be taking advantage of another party in a voluntary, mutually agreed upon contract, especially in a competitive environment.