Is there any legitimacy to personality types or is it just another

>>138953888
There's an in between here.
Not very accurate, but not made to be a trick
It's pretty bullshit if you go by the OP image though

>>138953888
nice 7rips.

r0lling for personality type.

pretty sure nobody on earth knows what they are doing...

>>138953888
MBTI is about as legitimate as horoscopes and blood type personality theory.

the big five is far better in terms of predictive validity and scientific basis

>>138954082
this is actually incorrect

the problem with mbti is that it's half true

big 5 is a lot more accurate

but as far as cognitive function stacks go (which underpin the whole theory) it's bullshit

>>138954082
t. ES** tard

ANY categorical testing is fine as a piece of fun trivia about how you respond to said test.

However, basing your life choices around the category you're placed in by such a test is plain retarded.

File: personalitytypes.png (931KB, 1412x2048px) Image search: [Google]

931KB, 1412x2048px

>>138953888
I'd say it's pretty accurate, but people tend to leave of the -T and -A at the end. That is the most important stat.
-T (turbulent) means you're a cuck and you don't stand for anything, meaning no matter what personality type you are it doesn't matter because you submit to the will of everyone around you.
-A (assertive) is what solidifies your personality. Assuring that your type means something because you stand by what you believe in.
I am INTP-A. I know when I'm right and I know why I'm right, and when I'm wrong I fucking fix it. I don't need dumbasses telling me that what I should believe in if I want to be accepted, because I don't care.

Pic for giggles.

File: The Rationals (INTP,ENTP,INTJ,ENTJ).png (281KB, 835x951px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 835x951px

>>138953888
all my tests are coming out as INTP but it seems way too autistic, I feel more like jaded ENTP so perhaps XNTP? Overall ENTP makes most sense.