I'm wondering what party I would belong to.
I thought I was Libertarian, however, I believe that people shouldn't have complete freedom, IE I feel that people can do whatever they want with their body, as long as it doesn't hurt other people, AND AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T HURT THEMSELVES.
Excuse the capslock, but I wanted to bring attention to that.
I basically prioritize health and safety over everything else, and I realize this encroaches on some freedoms, but I feel that anyone who hurts themselves doesn't know any better.
In response to most liberals/democrats who say that everyone should be allowed to even kill themselves if they wanted to, I feel that the same people who preach that, don't care about some mentally unhealthy person killing themselves, as long as they(the ones preaching it) get to smoke weed/drink alcohol.
They care about rights, I care about lives.
What am I?
>>138734546
Nazi.
Protecting people from hurting themselves leads to mandatory diets, mandatory exercise, full nanny statism. What about mental health? Forced socialising? Only party approved media with good healthy morals?
You're an authoritarian. You'll find others who want to force people to do things for their own good at your local Communist branch.
>>138734546
Trump will always be on your side, even when you're not on his.
>>138734546
Oh, you know.
>AND AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T HURT THEMSELVES.
You aren't a libertarian, you're an authoritarian.
>No birthday cake, it's unhealthy.
>Can't smoke that.
>No alcohol, it's bad for you.
>Coal mining outlawed.
>No more driving! Too risky!
>Oh, well, we'll have to implement more arbitrary constraints then. Banning driving is just going too far.
So we're back to business as usual.
OP, you're a retarded faggot.
>caring about anything
Weak faggot cuck
SAGED
>>138734546
>>138734546
>Oh look, someone attempting to assert their bullshit self righteous values over their fellow man like they know better!
You're no better than every autocratic asshole that came before you.
>>138734961
Actually it depends on how strong his stand is, we are generally in favor of something like this to a certain extent. But again, it depends how strong someone supports it, it is the difference between giving support people that are not in place or capable to take care of themselves from obliging people to do this or that because someone or a group of people think it is "the best" for them. In the second case are the authoritarians, who are usually dumb enough to never question themselves about what they hold to be "the best".
>>138734961
Anyone who wants to drill horns into their forehead or tattoo their eyeballs is obviously mentally ill. Obviously I don't think people would be doing any of this without some kind of (((outside))) influence. It should be the job of the family to enforce morals but our morals are so fucked up now I can only see it getting worse. Maybe that's the answer? Just let it get so extreme that people rebel and return back to a more natural state.