>HBO can't even keep games of thrones from leaking for

>>138714696
>hasn't seen them nasa leaks
>claims there were none

>>138714887
>"leaks" = disgruntled attention seeker said smth without proof
We have plenty of papparazzi pics of GoT filming scenes. But not even a single pic of the lunar sets from any missions?

File: hqdefault.jpg (21KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 480x360px

>>138714696
Is this a shadow of a camera man?
Yes it is.
He can survive deep freeze and no oxygen without a suit.
What a brave yankee.

>>138715677
>hqdefault

fake news

>>138715677
Bump for Putin.

>>138714696
Remember that in 90's you were treated like a tin-foil hat flat earther if you told the people around you about Rothschilds. How many decades did they manage to keep their wealth and influence a secret?

HBO didn't (((misplace))) the original footage and script for Game of Thrones either.

File: 1465656523212312321123.jpg (42KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 800x450px

>>138716465

>>138717206
In my lifetime i went from hearing

"Ah you are crazy! Bilderb what? How can you think such important people could gather like that."

to

"Oh yeah the Bilderberg group. Everyone knows about that... It's clearly not something shady since everyone knows it goes on."

Yeah.

>>138718567
the best has yet to come.

>>138718567
>oh yeah the jews? yeah they've been running this shit for a while, everyone knows that

>planes; pointy with wings = fly
>rockets; pointy = fly
>moon lander; not pointy = ???

And people believe that crap lmao wake up sheeple the russians would have tried if it was possible

>>138718761
you stupid nigga? it started as a rocket

>>138714696
Actually, tens of thousands don't need to be in on it. Only the three guys in the command module and one tech feeding fake telemetry to mission control. It's easy to fool the public but fooling a room full of top flight PHDs and military officers must be really satisfying. Not that I think the landing was faked. But your premise that everyone in Nasa would have had to be in on it is bullshit and you can do better.

>>138719336
I work in IT and if you think you could feed me a fake signal and fool me you are mistaken

nasa technicians are top notch

File: 1415722827187.jpg (90KB, 377x384px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 377x384px

>>138714696

They are all from Devil worshipping Mason families. They know how to keep secrets!

>>138719417
Why has nobody been to the moon since Lance Armpunch

>>138714696
I dont think the landing was fake i think the method of transportation was
I think the NSA or aliens or something took the astronauts to the moon who are really paid actors that have enough military experience to know to shut their fucking mouths.

>>138719417
If u think the NSA or the aliens would have any trouble fooling u then u are the one who is mistaken.

>NASA techs are top notch
I know several since i grew up down the street from the NASA facility in houston area and no they are fucking not. U are a moron.

>>138719811
>or the aliens

ah, I see you're just having fun

>>138714696
Moonlanding was real duh
Also the earth is not flat the amount of shit it would take for everyone that ever was in space from different countries (that at some point hated each other) not to reveal something this big is just impossible.

>>138719784

*crickets*

>>138719784
>Why has nobody been to the moon since Lance Armpunch

the moon is useless
russia was beaten

File: nasa2.webm (2MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x576px

>>138719884

File: 1503361954402m.jpg (113KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1024x576px

>>138719417
Here's my guide to the moon mission question.

When talking to normies, or co-workers but you just can't resist dropping truth.. I say the following;

>Nasa said they lost the technology to go back to the moon, how is this possible?

When talking to Reddit normies, the ones that know some conspiracy theories but deny them all;

>How did they get it 100% right on the first attempt?

When in a proper debate when facts are being thrown around;

>Why haven't they been back?

These aren't great questions but let's remember for a sec that the f35 is a thing, therefore all "muh budget" excuses don't stand.

I'd like to ask you why there's never been a polar circumnavigation of the world before, especially one with evidence. We have air to air refuelling etc, there's no explanation.

Earth is flat, nasa is a scam.

>>138719417
Pray tell how they can tell the difference between one signal and another signal back in the 60s?
The technicians may have been top notch, But the Cult of Death's practical joke department aren't exactly slouches either. There's no length they wouldn't go to for the lulz.

>>138720216
>Pray tell how they can tell the difference between one signal and another signal back in the 60s?

it's more about the origin of said signal

>>138714696
It was real, though I cant discount that they shot some fake footage so it would look better than the stuff they took aboard and it just got all muddled up because of our autist ancestors just looking for reasons to be assmad

>>138720325
>ancestors
you weren't alive in 1969?

jesus this site is getting full of kids

File: 1299333407001.jpg (47KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 200x200px

HBO plans to film new seasons, so they cannot execute the entire crew after filming

>>138714696
Easier to leak something that exists.

I mean, realistically, how is someone going to say the moon landing isn't real without saying it and watching the govt. and morons shout them down?

>>138720456
go on.

>>138720283
Well the rocket is real enough so I can transmit from there at the start no problem. Once we get into the mission who exactly is looking real hard at that signals origin data? Specially since the guys voices and telemetry is coming through clean. Maybe the signals guy is the mole. The point is it could be done. And all the smartypants would be none the wiser. These are the people least likely to consider the wool over their eyes. Because they are so smart. Don't you see how funny this would be for them. Playing a trick on their best got and fooling all the world for decades? Top fucking kek I'd say. That's why we need more proof then their say so. Sorry about that.

>>138720484
That's so true. Also as if nasa wouldn't have used midgets on the moon mission, they could've fit another 3 of them in the capsule.

>>138720823
>These are the people least likely to consider the wool over their eyes. Because they are so smart.
only part I agree with

>>138714696
You guys are on a role trying to get us to dismiss conspiracy theories today.

>>138714696
The best lie is the one that people want to believe.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-23 at 11.47.07 AM.png (880KB, 1260x796px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 1260x796px

>>138714696
If there radiatin levels in airport security machines fuck up your film
http://apps.tsa.dhs.gov/mytsa/cib_results.aspx?search=film

How the fuck did they capture all of this footage and bring it back to earth?
https://www.space.com/21353-space-radiation-mars-mission-threat.html

Don't forget they landed on the moon 6 times, not just one. 12 guys got up there. Pretty hard to fake 6 misions over a 3 year period.

File: image.jpg (32KB, 525x560px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 525x560px

>>138717206
Hell. Just 2 years ago I got BTFO a family BBQ by saying Obama created and funded ISIS...in fact you can still get shilled even here at /pol/ ...
It takes ages to get people to see and understand what is right in front of them..
Building 7.. Being a good example...

>>138718876
This really needs to be addressed

>>138714696
moon landing fakers btfo

>>138721088
>on a role
I wish I was on a role to teach you english

File: haha.png (334KB, 448x421px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 448x421px

>>138720216
>>138720823

Exellent points. Even Frank Byrne (the guy in charge) said that they could have faked it but didn't.

Also:
Where are the Russian, Japanese, Chinese or Indian images of the lunar landers?

Why are American images the only ones with the Apollo craft in them? They should be easy to circle in mspaint and upload if they exist... they don't.

Checkmate.

>>138721208
This it's fucking fake as all hell

>>138721517
there must be some explanation.

File: Apollo-11-on-the-moon-picture-950x690.jpg (115KB, 950x690px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 950x690px

>>138718876
>>138721517
>>138721729

that's a doctored photo. pic related is higher res. you can clearly see that it is edited.

the actual photo does not have the moon in it, the image of the moon comes from the "earthrise" photo taken during apollo 8.

>>138714696
only tinfoil hats who think they're supposed to question everything believe it's a 'hoax'

File: image.jpg (62KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 720x480px

>>138718948
They brought back moon rocks.
Pretty amazing. They got distributed around as prestige and favors to countries.
And every single moon rock has been lost.
Like.. The ultimate souvenir ... And everyone in every country was kaput careless and lost their moon rock.
Right.

>>138721729
what is the frame number? protip: if a pic has no number it's probably the work of a troll

File: apollo08_earthrise.jpg (1MB, 2280x2190px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2280x2190px

>>138721779
>>138721729
>>138718876
>>138721517
pic related. earthrise. notice the cloud pattern, shape of earth's shadow, and the landmasses. consistent across all images.

>>138721811
I personally saw moon rocks at the Smithsonian in Washington DC

>>138721863
please delete this

this is trying to be a nice thread

Oh,they went to the Moon for sure.They just faked the tapes to hide what they found there.Its much better being accused of faking the landing then accused of hiding what they found there.

File: image.jpg (27KB, 633x259px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 633x259px

>>138721666
Satan himself ^^^

>>138721779
that's not the issue they're saying that the earth should have appeared somewhere else, above the astronauts heads and not on the horizon, given the landing location

>>138721357
I was made fun of for saying the government was spying on people. That changed real quick after Obama was elected.
Honestly, I understand why (((they))) do what they do. The average person is FUCKING STUPID and deserves it.

>>138721350
All high degree Masons. Only the pilots and a few other bods need be in on the real joke.
>>138720979
It's called hubris, and it is the worst vice of the intellectual. The fact you wouldn't even consider it marks you for a zealot.
If you haven't personally been to the moon and verified the Apollo landing sites, then you cannot say with 100% certainty that they are there. You just can't. Thats real science.

>>138721861
Are they still there?

>>138714696

HBO can't have people killed

>>138718876

the earth appears as small as the sun to us because of distance
Input interpretation:
Sun | average diameter/Sun | distance from Earth

Result:

0.009198


--------------------


Earth | average diameter/Moon | distance from Earth
Result:


0.03357

>>138722031
>Are they still there?
yes

literally at the entrance of the science pavillion

File: as11_40_5868.jpg (2MB, 1833x1849px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1833x1849px

>>138721965
the moon was added in by some conspiracy theorist. pic related is the real image.

AS11-40-5868 (20 July 1969)
https://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo11/html/as11_40_5868.html

>>138718948
>the lander is what they came back in

Are you retarded?

>>138721863

Is that from a movie? Also how do they keep little bubbles and stuff from forming.

Just like 9/11.Watch the retards argue their soul out about the two towers,while even the existence of wtc7 is literally unknown.
Smoke and mirrors,smoke and mirrors.
Please continue arguing about the faking of the moonlanding while never even question what they actually found there that would validate the fake tape.

>>138722115
> I saw rocks that I was told came from the Moon

>>138722203
just disproving that guy who said the all got (((lost)))

File: Flat-Earth-Memes-33-9.jpg (111KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 960x960px

>>138722141
no its from a space mission

>>138721920
i dont get it

>>138722253
>i don't know how lagrange points work
that's at L1, between the sun and the earth. the second image has extremely high magnification.

File: ap11_lm_as11_40_5927.jpg (856KB, 2349x2362px) Image search: [Google]

856KB, 2349x2362px

>>138714696
nobody wanted to believe the moon landing was fake. they would rather believe america could do it and disregard the simple truth of the mater

exhibit A : the lunar landing module. small and had barely enough room for oxygen tanks and food and batteries and wires to justify all the lights and switches in between the open cavity inside it and the outer hull .

it also allegedly takes off from the moon and comes to earth. no real room for fuel

exhibit B : poo. waste management over the course of the trip to and from the moon wouldnt even be viable with so little space and you cant shit out the window.

exhibit C : the change in the timetable of the mission in the 90s. initially they claimed it took 3 weeks to get to the moon. now they claim 3 days to try to compensate for the lack of oxygen tanks and food needed to get there and back. some smart guy who went to the smithsonian said there wasnt enough space inside the lunar lander for a long trip so they quietly changed the logged amount of time for the trip.

the distance from the earth to the moon is 238,900 miles. to put this into perspective the shortest distance from east coast to west coast in america is 2,092 miles.

while the craft did allegedly achieve escape velocity according to nasa it also hung out in orbit around earth for 2 full orbits around the earth. the change in direction nulls any gain in speed from launch and since the earth is rotating in high earth orbit its not hard to circle the earth going at a snails pace. the earths rotation speed is 1000 miles per hour

here is the thing. in orbit it had no stages left on the initial rocket its just the landing module. no extra fuel tanks to burn to gain speed. the initial 3 week period for the trip to the moon sounds more reasonable if they didnt hang out in orbit. 3 days isnt even possible if they didnt have extra tanks.

>>138722269

stuff can move in a direction you know

>>138720109
if the earth is flat, how did i witness a solar and lunar eclipse with my own eyes?

>>138722393
Stop muddying the waters with this nonsense, child.

>>138722269

Blown out of a ventilation fan or something.

File: image.jpg (40KB, 927x117px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 927x117px

>>138722253
There's that 666 again.

>>138722038
as far as you know

>>138715677

offcourse its a camera man , who else took the picture?

>>138721208
radiation is blocked by metal film. can you point out where any thin metal sheeting is on their craft? ill wait. you do know stuff on earth produces radiation and we have those sources blocked by shielding right? ever heard of a nuclear reactor?

>>138718567
in my lifetime it went from omg you think those are chem trails up there? fucking conspiracy tard to
ooh yeah that's called cloud seeding, it's sound scientific fact. they spray the clouds to help the farmers.

>>138722595
Same way your car works without you knowing exactly how it works, something else blocked the light source.

Interestingly, the eclipse shadow was quite thin given the size of the moon, why wasn't it from northern Canada down to Panama?

>>138722866

if the earth is flat and the solar system is wrong how did they calculate when the eclipse was?

>>138722866
you could google how the eclipse works instead of staying ignorant btw. i dont see why i need to disprove your ignorance before we can debate. learn both sides and then we can talk

>>138722393

So you're saying all the people alive back then who watched the Apollo 11 mission on television until their return suddenly forgot it took 3 weeks and instead remember it as three days?

File: 1503366622591m.jpg (38KB, 820x1024px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 820x1024px

>>138723031
Same way the ancients did, they've been studying where the stars and moon move to forever.

It doesn't prove space since the ancients didn't go to space either

>>138723160
I'll jewgle that, whilst you jewgle why the horizon stays flat unless the camera has a fish eye lens at all altitudes.

>>138722253
>greater distance
>smaller fov
>objects futher away appear bigger
What a fucking surprise who would have guessed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tN9wM5A19c

Flatearth shills on time.Dont give them yous.

File: 13508904_519823568217382_5510954257922367456_n.jpg (75KB, 960x592px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 960x592px

>>138723244
that pic is the best pic related ive ever seen right in front of all of reddit

>>138723235
your brain shrinks the way the sun does in your webm when you you start thinking about flat earth

>>138723315
it stays flat because the earth is really really big. you cannot see a curve until you are significantly high, in space. imagine trying to see the curve on a basketball but you have to look through a magnificent glass you are so close to it.

SLIDE THREADS BY SAME USER. sage

>>138714696
Those space suits are science fiction. Americans embarrass themselves making such obnoxious claims. You may as well claim you landed on the sun.

>>138723349
Do you realize how big earth is? And how far you can actually look in one direction? I mean is this shit for real? Or is this some kinda obvious humor i am too stupid to get?

>>138723527
Yup and it gets bigger every year.

>>138723527
At this point I'm not sure if it's real or not.

>>138723581
who has ever claimed that the earth grew in size?

>>138723349
Thanks :) I'm liking yours too, do you have any more flat earth pics?

>>138723527
Standard shill tactic to derail threads about space/nasa/faked space to post flatearth stuff and force emotional response - they cant be this stupid! - from you so you start trying to argue with them how the earth is not flat.
They know the planet is not flat.They dont care because they get paid for derail threads.
Dont give them yous.

>>138723383
I get it, the issue I have with that is apparently the curve is inches down per mile forward. It just doesn't work irl, Bolivia salt lake for example (salar de uyuni)

>>138723383
8 inches per mile**

File: flatearth6.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>138723662
sure brah

>>138722393
>American education
A: The lunar module was 23' tall and 31' wide
B: The apollo astronauts shit in bags taped to their asses.
C:You're fucking retarded
D: While the earth might rotate at 1000 mph that only means an object would need to travel at 1000 mph to stay in a geo-stationary orbit. The ISS travels 17,150 mph and Apollo 11 reached speeds of 24,791 mph.

>>138714696

This.

Also

>if somebody tried to leak all the details to the media the government would kill them!

People have been willing to die for

A

L

O

T

less.

>>138723971
You assume - wrongly - that anyone would want to leak and cause global panic because people are stupid.
Logic dictates that if after all this time no leak happened,there was a genuine reason to keep it a secret.

File: 2124545.jpg (108KB, 1056x1080px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1056x1080px

>>138723349
>facebook watermark
>reddit front
>0 understanding of any science related thing ever written
Sums up pretty well the current state of this board

>>138723674
No i mean for real i am actually baffled earth is big from your perspectives shit looks basically always flat and the fact that you cant look as faar into the distance as you might think even when nothing is blocking the view is pretty well established.. so yeah.

>>138723628
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_Earth
Not that I think this is true but it has been hypothesised.
The point it, you don't know if the Earth is flat or round. You take it on faith from the priests of Science.
You don't know if the Moon landing was real or not. You take it on faith from the priests of Science.
Think of all the "truths" you profess that you haven't personally verified, nor, in many cases, would you be able to afford to do so if you so wished. Then you vent your frustrations on those of us who say MAYBE, seeing as they are so full of shit about so much, maybe this thing here they claim to have done is bullshit too.

>>138724417
Actually,the gravtiation problem with dinosaurs is a more compelling argument for expanding earth powered by energy to matter conversion in the core of the planet in my opinion.

File: 18341870_1168631703260322_1694774870784401051_n.jpg (55KB, 900x553px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 900x553px

actually i know for a fact its flat

cant believe i have to post a hey vsauce michael here videos lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxhxL1LzKww

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNqNnUJVcVs

>>138720097
That's just space debris you fucktard

also lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OnJCqtTxsA

>>138724598
Yes and I have yet to see any of these claims of this and other items that have been photographed that should have been under the curve been [debunked] by the (((skeptics))) {Also this work debunked pisses me off. In English bunk means untruth so to debunk something would surely mean to prove it true. Fuckin' doublethinkin' newspeakers but I digress}
So for this and this reason alone I make the choice to remain open minded as to the shape and disposition of the Earth and the Heavens, and until you are able to personally verify it, one way or the other, so should you.

>>138724417
Brilliant, you write really well. Good read.

>>138723349

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9ksbh88OJs

File: 1503487117336.jpg (129KB, 1200x960px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1200x960px

>>138724417
Larp, idiot, or confused

File: tent.jpg (255KB, 900x897px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 900x897px

>>138718948
>this tent
fucking retards
that "tent" material is called Inconel and it was painted with Pyromark to have it be extremely good at insulating the spacecraft.
The lighter material is called Kapton MLI which also protected the astronauts from heat.

>pic related: the "tent" without the insulation

>>138725350
Nice riposte. How will I ever recover?

>>138714696
Moon landing was in the 1960s

Easy to control what gets shown and not shown, no internet.

Then there's the fact that all the original footage was destroyed. Why is that? Were they afraid we'd increase the quality of the footage with modern day techniques and see the faults and the strings they used?

>>138720109
Every word in Hebrew means "to deceive"

File: 13312902_1103266309720359_877395136198521965_n (1).jpg (68KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x640px

>>138725396

File: 1503458771589.jpg (91KB, 960x675px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 960x675px

>>138726110
So true

>>138725887
So do you think every moonlanding is fake or just the first one?

>>138726110
lol

This is all you need to see. I showed my uncle and he actually teared up as he swallowed this very big red pill.

https://youtu.be/U5Hmjklmy6o

>>138726308
I don't know. Are absolutely sure it wasn't filmed in a studio set?

File: 1502839934385.jpg (40KB, 480x439px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 480x439px

>>138726464
if you believe they faked the moonlanding but are still a ball earther whats the point

youre a fool still

>>138722866
Because:
>Sun's radius is 695,700 km
>Earth's radius is 6,371 km
>moon's radius is 1,737 km
>Earth is 149.60 million km away from the sun (on average)
>moon is 385,000 km away from Earth
So during a solar eclipse, the moon will be in front of Earth
>149.60 million km - 385,000 km = 149.215 million km

If you drag a line from (0;695,700) to (149,215,000;1,737) and extend it all the way to x = 149,600,000, you get y = -53.541912 aka the moon doesn't even fully cover the Sun (you can still see the Sun's outline). I assume that during the eclipse the the orbital distances are slightly different, so y would be closer to the positive side. But since y is -50km, the darkest part of the shadow will have a radius of ~50km
this is just an estimate though

i'd normally be in these threads calling people that think the landings were fake fucking idiots of the highest order... that was before i actually read just a tiny bit of the evidence against us putting men on the moon. there is 100% some serious fuckery going on if NASA admitted not so long ago that they'd have trouble going back to the moon TODAY. like what? how have they went backwards in technology? we could do it no problem in the 1960s but can't do it today with all our modern advancements in technology? that makes absolutely no sense to me. another thing that really bugged me was how Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon... 1st men on the moon, a fucking HUGE deal, like insanely HUGE... and both either couldn't remember it clearly or simply refused to talk about it at all in any detail apart from in a day 1 astronomer level of detail. that was a huge bit of fuckery imo.

>>138714696
Punishment for former is lose job.

Punishment for latter is deded.

File: flat earthers BTFO.png (20KB, 614x377px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 614x377px

>>138723315
From the last time I argued with a flat Earther: pic related is how high your air balloon with a camera went to see the horizon curving.

We also don't live on a cylindrical planet, so of course the horizon will be flat. It will be at an equal distance from you in every direction when you're looking forward. The curvature only becomes apparent when you can look at an angle towards the Earth.

File: Flat-Earth-Memes-144-20.jpg (63KB, 904x600px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 904x600px

>>138727007
wow youre so intelligent bro

just cut to the chase and go watch some flat earther videos

its not a big mystery once you understand it

>>138714696
>>but somehow Nasa can keep a complicate conspiracy up for over 40 years, a plan that involved at least 10,000 people
Have you heard of the Manhattan Project? Because the general public didn't know for decades - not a single leak so your argument is nonsense. The Moon landing was real, not the footage we've been shown though.

>>138726624
More evidence for moon hoax than flat earth. Come back when you've photographed the ice wall at the edge of the world

>>138726624
ugh -_-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxhxL1LzKww

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNqNnUJVcVs

>>138723235
The sun was always a small ball in that picture. The only difference is that when it was overhead, it was much brighter and the camera clips off the brightness, making it look like a larger sphere instead of a normal sphere with a glow around it.

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-23 12:31:45 Post No.138727316
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-23 12:31:45 Post No.138727316 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/bant/1884221