Help me fill in the gaps here /pol/. I understand that Jews

>>138303219
*or is it simply a piece

File: propaganda.jpg (120KB, 960x629px)

120KB, 960x629px

bump

>>138303219
To loser idiots everything is powerful. What one wants to be versus what one is, is evidenced through historical outcomes.

>>138303825
Thanks for the verbal diarrhea, but unfortunately you didn't answer my question.

Plenty of civilizations have decayed morally and spiritually without Jews.

>>138303219
either they have to take over the country they live in, or form their entirely new separate country.

>>138304234
True. Is Jewish nepotism an accelerant or a symptom of a country already in decline? Or is their influence irrelevant/completely overblown?

>>138303219
None of these things are exclusively the responsibility of Jews. However without Jews none of these things would exist in any significant form. In scientific logic terms Jews are a necessary but not sufficient condition of these problems. Disregard the absurd and totalizing conspiracy theories, your first paragraph is basically all there is to it.

>>138304685
It's certainly overblown by a lot of the extreme right, but it's not absent. I would say that any high IQ group that considers itself an outsider would have fewer scruples about engaging in immoral business (e.g. pornography, immigration for votes and cheap labor) than the majority group. Opportunists exist in the majority group as well, so the outsider group is merely a catalyst. Jews are a bit unique in that they've historically persisted as a unique identity even when a small minority, so this effect can last for a while after they initially immigrate. I doubt that (dot) Indians will remain unassimilated in the US after several generations despite the high IQ of Indians here.

>>138303219
>>138303219
It's a much larger global power matrix, but many of the members are Jewish.

Look, divide and conquer is the oldest trick in the book. This is the impetus behind bringing in the Irish, the Italians, etc. in the 20th century. Then, when white countries got non-shitty enough (due to the US and Australia taking all their criminals) we started bringing in Mexicans.

Now Mexican birth rate is falling, and so we "need" to bring in Muslims.

It is well known that the underlying population is an good indicator of GDP. In US the population is leveling out, and the economy will probably not see higher than 3% growth any time soon.

So people with large investments and ties to think tanks, economists, academic institutions and the government definitely have a "plan" to solve this. That plan is increased immigration.

Anti-semitism (of the "joo" variety) is too simple of a framework with which to understand the global power matrix. Many of the global power matrix are jewish, but certainly not defined by their "jewishness".

America is a corporation that runs on the principles of cultural divide and conquer. It has for a long time. Any country with many different cultures offers it's differences as an attractive opportunity for control by rulers. This is why the borders of African countries cut straight through ethnic divisions: they want each country to be kept in containment by an opposition. Not out of some sinister evil, but out of a callous disdain for the realities of people they dominate.

>>138304792
Cool, that's what thought. I understand that some Jews played a major role in orchestrating the war in Iraq, and Messianic fantasies were a driving force for many Jewish Communists (particularly Trotskyists) in the 20th century in the early 20th century. However, these certainly didn't involve all Jews.

>>138303219
Obviously, if only Jews were the beneficiaries then the entire situation would become intolerable and therefore unsustainable. It works largely because there are enough good Goyim to obscure the true workings of the system.

But who controls the system? Well, who controls the money? There's your answer.

>>138305875
Wow, I said "in the 20th century" twice. I need to get some sleep.

>>138305525
>It is well known that the underlying population is an good indicator of GDP. In US the population is leveling out, and the economy will probably not see higher than 3% growth any time soon.
>So people with large investments and ties to think tanks, economists, academic institutions and the government definitely have a "plan" to solve this. That plan is increased immigration.
When people talk about how well the "economy" is doing, they typically refer to either GDP or the DJIA. Any singular measure will be lacking in many ways, but people still have a tendency to refer to a single measure when attempting get an idea of the health of something. We really need to meme GDP/capita as the singular measure of economic health (even though a holistic view is strictly better). Doing this would immediately counter many of the pro-immigration arguments.

>>138304182
because you don't like the answer.

>>138306064
No, I didn't. I particularly disliked the vagueness and implied sense of superiority.

>>138306008
>>138306008
I am not hopeful about the ability of unstructured groups of individuals like found on 4chan can act effectively against organized groups. Already arrogant from their win with Donald Trump, which was part fluke, they have proven to be powerless against organized actions of the media and Washington establishment, once those establishments become wise to their methods of operation.

4chan is basically a crippled soup of morons and white boi compete threads. The idea of "we" doing anything to take organized, constructive action towards some definite goal is completely unrealistic in my opinion. Structurelessness is attractive as a method of organization to those who are ignorant of the power of structure. Structureless groups like the feminist groups of the 70s can only act as an ideological matrix. It may influence perceptions in some small way, and win a few small battles using chaos and intimidation. But at the end of the day, without a bona fide political organization and hierarchy, I don't think anything will happen.

>>138306297
what is implied if history and your constant whining verifies it?

>>138305875
Funnily enough, this idea that a theory of behavior or a predictive model of a group's behavior have to be absolute in order to be valid is itself an idea propagated by Jews to deconstruct racial pattern recognition. Of course all Jews aren't involved in this stuff, at least not directly. By supporting the broader Jewish community most Jews still support these political aims, however. And the overall effect remains despite any outliers. Generalizations and heuristics are extremely important and necessary for developing any practical understanding of the world, which is why they are so demonized when it comes to White/European people using them to assess the behavior of competing groups. You cannot resist what you lack the language to describe. So don't feel bad about saying things like 'Group A does thing X' just because every individual member of Group A is not engaged in thing X and some members of Group B are. The trend is what matters. Individual cases can be dealt with as they come up but any policy is necessarily based on a polis, a grouping of people.

>>138303219
Watch this in it's entirety, and get back with us
if you still have any questions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPPQgC3Q8mg