Do people actually believe Trump's approval rating

>>138230740
libbies do

>>138230740
its probably lower desu

File: huffington-post-poll.jpg (47KB, 640x443px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 640x443px

>>138230740
Of course they do, they're the same retards that believed polls like this

>>138230740
Do they not poll areas under 100,000 people?

>>138230942
How many people are in the NYT/CNN buildings?

>>138230942
they poll whoever they fucking want, and if you find their methodology to be lacking they'll try to shame you with "YOU JUST DONT UNDERSTAND STATISTICS" bullshit.
fucking whites need to die already. if your people are stupid enough to fall for this shit en masse you dont deserve to exist.

>>138230740
Why not? You stupid bitch. It's an absolute gong show out there. Literal Book of Revelation is unfolding. Antichrist frog pedo jewess bitch

>>138230942
This is the problem. They choose a convenience sample size instead of a representative sample. I can definitely believe that people in New York and Chicago have a 33% approval rating of Trump. But go to places like Iowa and Indiana and that rating is going to be a lot higher.

>>138230740

Yeah, 33% in leftist coastal cities and campuses, which is where they do most all of their low sample 5%+ MOE narrative-pushing polls.

Leave the city and the vast majority of people have basically the same opinion, they like the guy for taking on DC but think he should stop saying stupid shit that gets him in trouble.

>>138232014
Proof. You lost the pop vote. Nobody cares. What have you accomplished other than being an evil joke?

>>138232014
What if they poll people from New York and Chicago that are familiar with the way people from Iowa and Indiana think?

>>138230932
>the same retards that believed polls like this
Statistician here: The odds that you could be 3 million votes behind your opponent and still have enough votes in the right states to win is around 1.9%. HuffPo was correct, Donald Trump's just lucky we have a shitty electoral system.

I mean , to me it's irrelevant. The globalists are pushing ahead with the take down of the US. I mean I've doubted it but it's becoming clearer and clearer that this will not end and only escalate regardless of who is President.

>>138230740
I'm already looking forward to 2020. If Trump can manage the 4 years of straight up propaganda and win again, the suicide rate in this country will skyrocket and I couldn't be happier.

>>138232609
Eclipse. Sept 23. No obama to make that. Only you

>>138230740
Of course not.

He has done a great job so far.

>>138232609
The election night salt mining threads were amazing.

>>138232420
>3 million
I'm still skeptical of that number. Democrats were full steam ahead on vote recounts after the election, but when any investigation tries to look into voter fraud, they're full stop.

>>138232420
they had polls in each state, and the polls were consistently wrong in swing states. Sometimes by gigantic margins. Polling the whole country is literally meaningless in a presidential election.

>>138230932
fucking thiiiiiiiiiiiis. it's the same people thinking the Dems are gonna take shit back in 2018. anyone with a basic understanding about current trends and how the libs don't even have a single political platform besides "fuck trump" are in for a rude awakening. Trump may not have the audible support, but when it comes to voting time the people will come out once again against retardation. antifags always screech the loudest, but the silent majority is always gonna be against censorship. Even with Google/facebook/twitter/youtube's propaganda and censoring, the internet allows us to have better context for most things, and people can simply look back at the past 9 months and see just which side has been the most violent.

>>138232420
Holy shit, what a pathetic little faggot you are

>>138232420
>hurr durr the popular vote matters
Voters don't even have an IQ test yet you idiot. Trump won fair and square despite all thw backpedaling from "it can't be rigged, you're just crazy" that the democrats did . Anybody educated and intellectually honest knows that Trump was the less harmful choice overall. The electoral college understood that before any of the retarded self entitled democrats did. They still don't get it

>>138232420
the only thing you make statistics of is how many brown men your wife has fucked while married to you, low IQ cuckboi

>>138230740
I have confusion why people believe this. I don't trust any political poll that comes out of the Leftward media at this point.

As far as i know everything on those sites are fabricated until proven true in my mind. They did nothing but lie, stage events, and silence others.

>>138232420
If you where actually a "Satistician" you would realize that the California, IL, NY, and Texas vote is just white noise and it should be ignored and the only people that should be included in these polls are people in swing states, and possible swing states. The media fucked up because they used solid color states in the polls.

Obviously you are larping as something you are not, just another Gender Studies student.

File: IMG_9002.jpg (54KB, 526x526px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 526x526px

>>138233429
>trump was the less harmful choice overall

Do people on /pol/ really believe this?

File: CNN1.jpg (922KB, 432x559px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 432x559px

Fake

>>138234562
No

>>138233828
>1% of chance to win
>99% of Hillary victory chance

>>138234562
Yes. Clinton was the worst possible choice from any party, during the primaries and general election. Voting for any party other than Republican would have guaranteed a Clinton victory.

>>138232420
>Statistician here
Did you get your degree at Phoenix University?

It's even lower.

>>138230740

I don't. It's like not at 50% - likely in the 40s somewhere. Thinking it's at 33% is silly.

File: Nicole_sucks_Dempsey's_cock.png (68KB, 226x209px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 226x209px

>>138232420
The only poll that matters is the election, statist retard.

>>138235635
probably from University of Maryland University College.

Am I like the only one who remembers those commercials? I thought I was dreaming when I first heard it half asleep

>>138234562
Have you seen the middle east?

>>138232420
This is just plain wrong.

Theoretically a candidate could even win 99% of the popular vote, and still lose the election.

>>138230740
much lower after firing bannon

File: redwhiteballoons2.jpg (402KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 1080x1080px

>>138230740
>>138230740
NEXT RIGHT WING RALLY HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED

FLORIDA HERE WE COME

thread here
>>138215412 → → →
>>138215412 → → →
>>138215412 → → →
>>138215412 → → →

>>138230740
Only retarded city-dwelling liberals believe it.

>>138230740
The problem is the Left expects everyone else to make as much noise as they do. So when it doesn't happen they think the support doesn't exist. The problem is they are continually proven wrong.

>>138230740
Say it with me now MADAM PRESIDENT. drumpfkins BTFO

>>138232252
>>138232420
>http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-18/us-has-35-million-more-registered-voters-live-adults-red-flag-electoral-fraud
what 3 million votes?

File: hypocrisy.png (227KB, 640x598px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 640x598px

The polls are as fake as leftist opposition to racism.
If leftists really opposed racism, they'd oppose the chains of dependency that have locked minorities into the underclass.

File: cali-counties-voters-575x589.png (129KB, 450x461px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 450x461px

>>138239323
>AM PRESIDE

>>138235245
>Public Enemies "blood on their hands"
I cringed so hard