The cluster genetically with germans and look germans. They are

>>138195959
>live with Austrians and Transylvanian Saxons for hundreds of years
>be genetically closely related to Germans
gee, how did that happen?

>>138196459
Hungarians are austrians and your shit country should accept them as germans too.

>>138196666
you probably misread my comment

>>138196859
Your english sucks

>>138195959
Modern day Hungarians are a mixture of the Magyars, that came in the middle ages and the Avars/other steppe people like the huns, that lived there before. There was also some german and turkish mixtures in there too, because they were occupied by the ottomans for a long time and the rest of the time, they were part of the Habsburg empire.

>>138195959
>Med subhumans
>European
Kek

>>138195959
What is this and why is the British one so clustered?

>>138196666
Hungarians are gooks, bozgor

>>138197402

Many very similar samples. All the Insular Celts are closely related.

>>138198068
When you put the world map, all european countries appear very clustered.

>>138198253

Yes, but obviously Irish, English, Welsh and Scots are going to be more tightly clustered than say, comparing Czechs and Norwegians.

>>138198460
Yeah

>>138198068
So...The closer two groups are in the graph, the closer they're related?

>>138197379
sneaky chechen subhuman with inferiority complex
likes to hide flags
literal subhumans

>>138197402
because britian has been invaded and raped by every european for over a millennia. The only difference between their people is culture

>>138200288

Only in the two metrics that are measured in the graph, they might diverge in other metrics.

>>138195959
Central Europeans are all like half German half Slav. So, you can say they're the same, but they have differing languages, culture and identity

>>138200937
I see, do you know what metrics were being used in this one?

>>138201069
They different proportions of slav, austrian, chinese, turk and greek admixture. Central Euros are very mixed.

>>138201541
first two principal components of a PCA on SNP data
basically the two directions(geometric not geographical) of major genomic variation
often it resembles geography due to how genetic variation tends to obviously be affected by geographic proximity, but not necessarily

>>138202326
Okay then, thanks.

So what does this retarded chart actually imply
left: the more you go the more brown you get
right: opposite of left
north/south: ???

>>138202326
>>138202832

Additionally, assuming those components account for a majority of the variance across all the variables put into the PCA in a data set of many variables, the two metrics effectively take into account multiple factors, which means your original statement "The closer two groups are in the graph, the closer they're related?" would be quite accurate

>>138203275
>north/south: ???

North: Polar bear.
South: Niggers

>>138203275

As >>138202326 said it's a principle component analysis, the numbers have no real physical meaning, it's just statistical tool for condensing a huge amount of information in the raw data down to a much more digestible form that can make trends and clusters more visible

>>138203275
you are basically projecting all genetic variation into a two dimensional surface, interpretations of the sort are quite far fetched but basically
left is signal of more broadly mediterranean/MENA ancestry, right is more broadly north Eurasian
up is more west Eurasian specific, down is more east Eurasian

>>138204434
>up is more west Eurasian specific, down is more east Eurasian
So you be saying Georgians and Lezgins are as mongoloid as Turks, Adygeis and Chuvash?
that's b.s imo but i had a better map lemme post it

>>138195959
where do iraqis cluster in this

File: 1503155581199.png (515KB, 1600x1440px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 1600x1440px

>>138205056
heh found it

File: MDLPwestasian.jpg (259KB, 1600x1228px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1600x1228px

>>138205056
not mongoloid, Eurasia is a big place, there's various genetic components that can at the same time sort of "push" in the same direction even if they are from different sources

>>138205279
different samples equals different proportions
including strongly divergent east populations is going to lead to a different picture, albeit with similarities
notice for instance how Iranians are still more to the right compared to Sardinians, and not because they have east asian ancestry, it's just that they have something else in common with other population to the right that pushes them in that direction, while Sardinians have such west Eurasian specific ancestry that in all those PCAs they are almost always in the opposite direction of every population east of Europe(looking at it in a west-east cline)

pic related is probably a good explanation

>>138195959
>cutting off the axis labels
always

>>138204049
finding PCA graphs well explained on /pol/
> makes me wonder

>>138195959
When you see, how close europeans-whites are and that western civilization happened for a reason.

The map makes sense. The french are almost the center of it.
-greeks-italians
-notth-russians and finns
-english-irish
-sweden-norway
-spain-portugal-north italy
-poland -belarus

Sardinians and basques are europeans but they look always so much inbreed in those maps

Osterreich is better version of germany.

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-19 04:04:52 Post No.138209464
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-08-19 04:04:52 Post No.138209464 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/bant/1840407