Hey /pol/, what's your opinion of Monarchism? It seems like

Any system that relies on the right person being in the position of power is a poor system

>>138132533
Monarchism+Fascism is the ultimate system

Just look at how cucked Limeys, leafs, aussis, and kiwis are. Down with the Crown, 1776 world wide!

Depends if they are communist

>>138132971
The Crown has been communist since 1949

>>138132971 ofcourse not, communism is cancer

I'm monarchist, but since restoration of monarchy is almost impossible, I guess I will stay with fascism.

>>138132533
Traditionalist Monarchist here, all the good dynasties got deposed.

Would love to see the Bourbons and Hohenzollerns back, but it'll never happen at this rate.

>>138132533
Too inconsistent.

>>138133459
yeah, but it seems together it would create an unstoppable force

>>138133770
what makes it inconsistent? It seems like having a person specially trained and bred for leading would be better than any politician

>>138132533
>Hey /pol/, what's your opinion of Monarchism?

same as communism

>>138134028
Any reason why?

File: i-f414434b49438248c19ec65c8a0282fe-CharlesII.jpg (8KB, 200x275px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 200x275px

>>138132533
It may seem like a good idea until you end up with a mentally retarded king like pic related.

>>138134164 yeah,but it seems like that can be stopped by banning incest or making products of incest ineligible.

>>138133956
Having such a large amount of power unconditionally concentrated into such a small number of hands is incredibly risky, not to mention the lack of failsafes for getting rid of a "bad" monarch

>>138134164
Habsburgs were trash.
>>138134407
Carlos wasn't technically incest-related, just inbred.

Habsburgs had shitty genes though, and he was proof (also, look at Charles V).

The most inbred dynasty was the Capetians, but they have a healthier gene pool with less recessive traits, so they could get away with consistently marrying cousins and uncle-niece marriages.

>>138132533
I would prefer something like Roman Empire or Doge of Venice

>>13815857
yeah, but it'd be better to have a formal way to pass on power instead of everyone fighting for it when the emperor died

All monarchies got cucked hard due to usury being a sin for the christians, but alright for the jew.

Yes u r missinh a BIG piece of history, related to how things are today.

>>13813264
well that problem could be solved by getting rid of jews

Better than democracy, that's for sure

>>138136264
Yeah it couldn't work if the bankers had more money than the monarchy, but it was fun while it lasted.

>>138136264

That used to be under control when our latin brothers had the Inquisition and we had cossacks. The problem began with the humanism(Renaissance) that led to Enlightenment and the fall of the traditional monarchies all over Europe. Yes, jews must convert and not allowed to express their religion in public. They killed our Saviour.

>>138136563

Hans Hermann Hoppe has such a good book on this topic: Democracy, the God that Failed. God, I miss my AnCap days.

>>138136734
That isn't really a problem independent to monarchies, democracy and capitalism are also susceptible, but again the problem would be over if the bankers were exiled or killed.(which would be easier for a monarchy, because of the complete power)

>>138132533
WTF is wrong with you? you live in the country that gave you your God given right to freedom!

>>138136264
Except Jews were considered personal property of Kings most of the time and would simply expel them if they couldn't pay denbts.

>>138137344
However, due to their influence, the bankers could easily manipulate the monarch to let them keep doing their (((thing)))

>>138132533
What if the king dies and some kid takes the throne?

What if the next king is actually really fucked up and doesn't have the best interest in mind for his people?

>>138137238
the problem isn't just with them following Judaism, its also that they are ethnically jewish and will always cause problems

>>138137427
Monarchy isn't opposed to freedom

>>138134557

A bad monarch is better than a good republican since the bad monarch will have the monopoly of bad actions. Monopolies of bad actions are better, overall, because the quality of the service(wich is a bad action) is worst. And, moreover, the King would kill anyone who would compete with him. Hans Hermann Hoppe really has a good aproach on this topic.

>>138134164
Saint Isidore of Seville had a good saying on this topic: Rex eris si recte facies, si non facias, non eris(the king is king if he does the correct thing. If he doesn't then he is not the king). Aquinas even said that killing a tyrant is a legit form of self defense

>>138137763
>What if the king dies and some kid takes the throne?
What is a regent?
>What if the next king is actually really fucked up and doesn't have the best interest in mind for his people?
Kings have been deposed before, it's not uncommon.

>>138137763
I would assume his vassals and citizens would act as a counterbalance by threatening to dispose of the king

>>138132533
I miss it. Traditional Empire where ethnic Russians and Germans rule over Turk-Ukrainians, Caucasians, Jews and nomad gooks. My ancestors made sure enough of asiatic backs are whipped proper. One ancestor of mine during the days of Krepostnoe Pravo used Jews and Tatars almost exclusively for his slave stock in his lower Muscovite mansion. in his days he went around his lands and was kicking out several teeth from their subhuman mouthes with one hit. That's why other land owners and his friends called him a dentist

>>138137766

What is wrong with them beint ethnically jewish? It is not something they could control. Race is not something with intrinsic value. Blaming someone because of their race is like being an inverse version of Black Lives Matter.

File: zqd1hsgcsq4y.jpg (204KB, 720x365px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 720x365px

>>138132533
What kind of Monarchism?

>>138132533
better than a democracy, not better than a republic

>>138138596

That is not an attitude to be proud off, as a Christian. Saint Vladimir the Great, when converted to Christianity, showed us how the aristocracy should act and rule

>>138138634
Race does more than decide skin color, It affects bone structure,IQ, testosterone and many other things. While they didn't chose it, it still affects their actions and how they think. There has been many scientific data backing this up.

File: [refutes praxeologically].png (1MB, 920x1250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 920x1250px

/thread

>>138139426

I know that race has impact on IQ, bone structure and so on but you cannot punish people for that. I mean, no one chooses to be black. However, you may punish them for the choices that they take(like usury, robbing, etc.)

File: 1475555880896.jpg (47KB, 455x652px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 455x652px

>>138132655
The 'right' person according to whom...

How come kim jung un isnt considered a king?

>>138139687
That's exactly the issue, there's no accountability

File: top.jpg (45KB, 859x960px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 859x960px

>>138139530


Perfect.

>>138139644
True, but once the jew gain the power to exploit people, they already are very hard and deadly to get rid of. Think of it as stopping a disease before it can develop.

>>138139831
he's a communist

>>138132533
Constitutional monarchy, like separating the head of state and head of government? Sounds like an okay idea, but as soon as your country goes multiculti the monarch becomes pointless. By the time Prince Wossname ascends the throne, the majority of his subjects won't be his people. Good luck being a focus of unity then.

If you mean a dictator, or a hereditary ruler, no. Kangz is utterly contrary to our values, it just leads to civil war and succession crises.

>>138139174
They were not White anyway. Christianity was a thing for literal rural suburban retards. Ethnic Russians were more connected to mysterious practices and folkish pagan traditions

>>138140218

The best portuguese politician after the 1640 was Antonio de Oliveira Salazar. He had a percentage of jewish blood but he was a Christian. By becoming a Christian one can overcome his race. In Salazar's case he made Portugal a literal paradise during war time.

File: RomanovSaints.jpg (52KB, 399x624px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 399x624px

>>138140767
>Ethnic Russians were more connected to mysterious practices and folkish pagan traditions

No data to support that

>They were not White anyway

So that gives you the right to beat them? The Czars are mad at you.

>Christianity was a thing for literal rural suburban retards

Like Czars, nobles, etc.

I am a monarchist. I despise democracy and every other non democratic system is totalitarian (fascism, national socialism) or Sisyphean (libertarianism, anarcho capitalism) NRx is right and Nick Land is a genius.

>>138141401
>picture
Formal public image of course. Niki and his wife were participating in affiars, group sex and we're surrounded with mystics like Rasputin. Russian Orthodoxy is cloaked with old Pagan ways, holidays and symbols
>The Czars are mad at you.
That same Czar was killing around 800 cats for sports a year in his garden. It was his hobby.
>Like Czars, nobles, etc.
You have no idea what you are talking about

The only based system of government.

Nationalism, socialism, liberalism. Mere shadows left by the revolutionary movements that they once were in the 1700s, becoming first more and more radicalized and violent and then pathetic leftovers living in what was left of the world after the havoc and destruction created by these modernist and degenerate revolutionary movements.

Picking one side is staying in the system and following what you were conditioend to follow.

Break the conditioning, be a monarchist.

>>138143132
Nicholas was a retard and I feel very little sympathy for him.

Charles I, sure. Louis XVI, absolutely. Nicholas II was just a complete idiot who got a reprieve in 1905 and pissed it away.