To those of you who don't believe that white genocide is being committed through migration. I remind you that Anglo-Saxons completed a near bloodless 100% replacement of what we now call the UK.
>>138114548
Then why does Scotland and Ireland still exist..
>>138114548
Modern English people are probably only around 5-10% descended from the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Frisians, etc. For the most part, they are acculturated native Britons.
>>138114548
>implying that British DNA has changed over the last 12000 years
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0719_050719_britishgene.html
>>138116631
this
>>138114548
What is Feudalism? Like when the Romans and Normans conquered, all the Anglo-Saxon did was make themselves the ruling class and the warrior class that built the castles and made themselves Lords over the Peasants. The amount of Celtic DNA/red hair in England shows the extent to which the native stock survived.
>>138114548
Non whites are willing to share their land and genes with whites. Why are whites unwilling to return the favour? Why are they so selfish.
>>138114548
>bloodless
fuck back off Germany, Saxon scum!!
>>138114548
That's actually not true. >>138117415 this is tho.
>>138114548
>near bloodless
>
>>138117415
Not true. The average is 30%. That increases way up if you are in Yorkshire or eastern areas to like 80% or to 0% in areas of wales and Scotland.
>>138114548
Those are all white just different tribes
Mudslimes and niggs on the other hand are not
>>138114548
England != UK
>>138117415
No. There are many Englishmen today who are descended from Irish, Scottish, welsh, Cumbrian, elmetian, Cornish people from later assimilations(after England converted to Catholicism) and immigrations. But Anglo Saxons are the primary descendants of modern Englishmen.
>>138119644
This.
It was not "bloodless" through the literally 1000+ years of English persecution of Native Britons and Celts.