Why do leftists have all the scientists and the high IQ people

>>137851672
They simply know they lost the argument and are making an appeal to anti science and research idiots

Depends on the field. Sociologists and anthropologists are almost 100% leftist but STEM fields are majority right wing in almost every country.

Science is only true when it supports their ideology.

The writer probably overheard a white male correcting a POC on some scientific fact and it got him so buttslaughtered that he had to write an entire article about it.

Yeah but if so why are all the scientists in their side, from Neil degrasse Tyson to Stephen hawking, why do they openly
support the left?
>>137851869
>>137851877
>>137852013
>>137852064

>>137851877
This.

Also, inside of every social scientist is a celebrity waiting to break out. They don't give two shits about "science" they want to be famous. Famous for their work, famous for their opinions, famous for their politics. Their Phds are just the random path they're taking to get to be the celebrity everyone listens to and fawns over.

>>137852333
Money

>>137851877
you forgot """climate scientists"""

File: redpills.png (1016KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

1016KB, 1024x576px

>>137852726

>>137851877
>but STEM fields are majority right wing in almost every country.

There is no evidence for this in the U.S. it might very well be possible in Turkey, but you guys roll bones and call it science.