gg net neutrality fags I am sure glad these kikes dont have

>>137814772
>When we kick off the thing you like, that's a victory for Net Neutrality.
I'm glad they're open and honest about it being a personal decision, but fucking come on.

>>137814938
>all the things are equal
>Some things are more equal than others

Glad it's finally settled

File: 1500947889442.png (34KB, 851x164px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 851x164px

Digitalocean took down DS and hatroen hosting.

Big tough ancaps can't stand corporations having the right to refuse service to whomever the fuck they want

I actually respect Price for having the balls to go "I banned this site because I hate them and fuck them" instead of dancing around some virtue signalling bullshit about diversity

Props

>>137816064
theres like 1 billion offshore hosting providers. Why are they getting their shit hosted through normie hosts?

>>137816778
Because they're mentally ill brainlets that can't even be assed to scan their hosts' ToS for content policy

>>137816778
Shit wasn't supposed to be political. Everyone was operating under this mass delusion that it could stay that way.

>>137816764
How is that not virtue signalling when they literally released a memo about their virtue signalling

stupid fuck

>>137817308
>doing something out of spite
>doing something to show everyone how much you care
are you daft

More importantly, where's the Stormer at now? I literally just started reading it last week.

>>137816764
If he had balls he would be a evil nazy.
He is just a stupid nerd, who made a stupid decision first and than admitted that.

>>137814772
Don't worry. Government loves money. Eventually government won't be satisfied with company A's contribution and will turn things upside down once more. This has all happened before and will again.

In the long run it probably doesn't amount to much of anything.

Regional monopolies on internet service are dying with advances in tech. Before too long this won't even be a conversation.

This might be a tad optimistic. But I think we are going to leave behind the roads we've constructed to confine the internet on/in for airports pretty soon.
Internet infrastructure will look completely different soon. We occupy too much area and have regions that are too sparsely populated to hope for a wire or fiber connection to each and every person

Grants dry up.

Let's look at the other side of things - What if ISPs decided internet gaming shouldn't have any place in the world. It isn't a productive use of our time and energy so they constricted our data flow so much that we couldn't play WoW, XIV, Runescape, Overwatch, PUBG, Black Desert Online, CS:GO, Rocket League, Rust, or whatever or any other game in the way we do now. You bet your ass people would start destroying shit, rioting, or boycotting the fuck out of a company. The backlash would be massive

That's why I'm optomistic.

The backlash would be massive. At the end of the day, we put food on the table for those people.

>>137814772
>it is important that what we did today doesn't set a precedent

is this faggot literally retarded?

>>137814772
HAVE A FUCKING CONVERSATION??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

YOU JUST FUCKING STOPPED THE CONVERSATION YOU GOD DAMN FAGGOT. SOMEONE PLEASE FOR FUCK SAKE HACK THESE SHITHEADS .

>>137821062
he is a liberal so yes

>>137818443
it'll be back they are working on it and its going to be bigger then ever I would imagine.

>>137817023
thats not really the point fucking idiot

>>137814938
No, no, they said it's bad, but it's really good. Don't be a Nazi.

>>137818443
Shoahed. Charlottesville really angered the (((powers))) that be and its offline for now

>>137821557
Why would a Nazi pay (((Google))) and (((Godaddy))) to host their sick pseudo-parody LARP site

Are they good goys?

Or are they just <100IQ subhuman scum?

>>137814772
Honestly I enjoy when those things happen because it means people might start looking into undeniable fully distributed systems more seriously.

>>137822046
you are a deluded idiot
if anything this guy is going to face backlash for daring to question his actions

>>137821972
They're so unafraid of the nazi alt right they won't even let them speak.

>>137822002
Are you retarded? You insulted each site you have some bias towards them having an argument with you is fucking stupid. You clearly don't give a fuck about free speech or being neutral on the subject. Fuck off back to lebbit where they can censor you for everything you don't deserve to be on 4chan.

>>137821898
but being a commie is ok?

oh, your a bongaloid, you goys don't have free speech, do you?

File: mein gott.png (18KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 429x410px

>>137814772
>Any Jew who owned a newspaper was pressurised into selling out. If any Jewish owner refused to do this, the government banned the production of his newspaper for a few days that could then become weeks and months. By using this tactic, the Nazis hoped to bankrupt Jewish newspaper owners. This is what happened to the Jewish owned publishing house Ullstein.

Cloudflare is using Nazi censorship tactics to destroy freedom of the press.

>>137814772
This is why we need Namecoin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OFv4fHsZQ0

>>137816764
Ok then why did he go begging the Feds for net neutrality?

>>137822327
Nope I don't give a shit about the CEO denying service. I think him selling out his shilling because he mad is fucking hilarious desu

>>137824304
Net neutrality is specific to ISPs. It doesn't mean neutrality to meanwords. You should educate yourself a little bit

If you're going to bawl because the businessman denied service to some shitlord he hates, I hope you aren't crying every time a court tells a Christian bakery they have to make a faggy dildo cake

>>137824754
Ok but then why should I support net neutrality so this faggot can have cheap internet?

>>137814772
They probably shouldn't of called that lady who died a whore.

It was in bad taste and made it ok to kill them.

>>137825597
Because you won't be able to stream trap porn without paying for the alt-right package to your local ISP provider, which on average makes 2800% revenue/costs already

>>137825717
She probably shouldn't have been a fat communist whore then

>>137825778
There wasnt any problem before NN ruling

>>137823435
does this shit work?

>>137824754
>I don't give a shit about the CEO denying service
when they are a monopoly it's wrong that they should be allowed to deny service unless the content is criminal in some way

being a satirical nazi isn't a crime

>>137825119
is the bakery a monopoly?

>>137814772
>we cannot have the debate while the daily stormer is hosted with us

wat

>>137824754
>It doesn't mean neutrality to meanwords.

yes of course it does you moron. you are neutral to all packets.

>>137825717
possibly on purpose, now they are a martyr, and have generated a fairly big splash in normieland

look how pathetic this anti-White cuck ceo is being, he'll never regain his reputation again, or that of his company. alternatives will arise

it's strange so many companies are being outright anti-constitution/anti-trump. how does it make good business sense to target and upset 50+% of your customers, and potential customers? right-wing people tend to run more businesses, it's blatantly a breach of their fiduciary responsibility

>>137822002
the internet companies are just hypocrites, that's all. They like to larp about chinese freedom fighters when in fact, they are very afraid of what is socially wrong.

File: 1476012926200.png (330KB, 667x672px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 667x672px

>>137827293
at least this is highlighting how much monopoly power these big ineternet corps have, not sure how any legislation against them will get through congress though

or does the anti-trust division of the DOJ have the power to regulate them already?

>>137827317
We need to make a list of all of the degenerate shit that he still hosts

>>137827293
>when you don't know what net neutrality is or want to change its meaning to suit your agenda

>>137827733
> have the power to regulate them already?
Well the supreme court has a already said growing wheat on your own property is somehow commerce between the states so I dont see why not

>>137827293
See it's this kind of raw ignorance that leads you retards to host nazi content on google of all places

>>137828012
The point is that its useless shit that does nothing to stop censorship
All it does is save companies like netflix google and facebook shekels

>>137828012
>want to change its meaning to suit your agenda

t. netflix

>>137827317
The 1st doesn't apply to businesses brainlet. Nazi garbage also doesn't make up more than 1% of their customers

>>137828169
I'm not sure any businessman on this earth gives a dead rat fuck about omega males' feelings over a new car

File: 1497433721523.jpg (78KB, 714x714px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 714x714px

>>137827852
hmm, how would we go about that?

good plan though

>>137828040
yes, but that then makes it federal jurisdiction. the question is if there are already anti-trust laws on the books that can be used, or if they would have to pass a new on in this hostile congress

>>137828558
>The 1st doesn't apply to businesses brainlet
so what's the rationale behind bakers having to bake cakes for anyone?

>Nazi garbage also doesn't make up more than 1% of their customers
yes, but how many of their customers are 1a supporters? whilst you may be correct that it doesn't apply legally, ethically and morally it does, or at least is perceived to by ~50%+ of the population

>>137814772
> "Not set a precedent"
Too late.

>>137828558
>The 1st doesn't apply to businesses brainlet. Nazi garbage also doesn't make up more than 1% of their customers

Yes, it is time for them to accept they aren't different from other big corporations. They don't care about 'le internet freedums!!', just business.

File: 1472489170882.jpg (20KB, 168x299px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 168x299px

>>137828766
chekkked, and THIS

File: censorship.jpg (400KB, 642x1981px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 642x1981px

>>137814772

>>137828763
>ethically and morally it does, or at least is perceived to by ~50%+ of the population

If you actually believe this you're in as big a bubble as the jittery lefties. Talk to some normies and see how many give a fuck

>>137828836
They have accepted it. They just release these statements for publicity. They'll get like 5 vapid lefties making up for the zero revenue from some shitheads that were almost definitely on the free plan

>>137828558
>shill endlessly about wanting the net to be treated like a utility
>except that a company can deny you service for wrong think because muh free markets

I must be missing something.

File: 1478298273975.jpg (277KB, 640x518px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 640x518px

>>137829371
>If you actually believe this you're in as big a bubble as the jittery lefties. Talk to some normies and see how many give a fuck
give a fuck about corporate censorship?

what makes you think I know any normiees?

also, you dodged the question. a huge section of the public still believe in the principles of the constitution

and explain the logic of bakeries being forced to bake cakes. I'm open to being convinced

>>137828766
We should find out what porn sites they host and unleash the feminists

>>137829515
I'm sorry you seem to have me confused with some strawman in your headcanon

I run my own VPN server and TOR relay because I'm not a DDIQ that relies on corporate jews to be nice to me

>>137829103
Unite The Right really scared the kikes. These websites are going to have to start hosting themselves in personal server systems.

>>137829643
Dodge what? The Bill of Rights doesn't apply to businesses. Discrimination laws protect against physical discrimination (like you), not people rejecting you for your stupid ideas

>>137830090
might have to go back to mailing lists or nntp

>>137830146
so which part of the BoR requires bakeries not to refuse any order?

>>137829103
You can also add Hatreon to that list, by the way. They got shoahed by Digital Ocean just today.

>>137830269
None of it. Anti-discrimination laws do, dumbass. That's me pointing out the hypocrisy of you crying that Cloudfront has to allow your dumb ideas but it's so mean when the government makes people serve gays.

What a coincidence that everyone who supports net neutrality are deciding to shutdown and block political sites/users they don't while the big bad ISPs who net neutrality was meant to constrain have actually remained neutral in this controversy.

>>137830529

*don't like

>>137830529
The tech industry is massively hypocritical. Doesn't matter though.

This is a good reality check though LARPers! The law doesn't give a shit about you and nobody gives nearly enough shit to change that! You can't even secure your own websites, what people are you going to secure?

>>137829798
My understanding is that even with those precautions the corporate Jew can still get at you.

Please show us all the path to freedom woke one.

>>137830529
ATT are /ourguys/

CNN boss in crosshairs if AT&T-Time Warner merger approved

http://nypost.com/2017/06/28/cnn-boss-in-crosshairs-if-att-time-warner-merger-approved/

>>137830909
Be persistent and distribute it. Be a plague.

Look at how good pirate community is at evading the Jew. That's not mean words, that's literally shitting on their shekels.

File: 1471234613828.jpg (38KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 413x395px

>>137830401
so bakeries can't discriminate, but internet domain registrars and ddos protection sites can?

but that isn't hypocritical, please explain

I'm genuinely interested

>>137830745
>LARPers!
is this in your shill breifings or something? kek, stop using words wrong

>>137829789
When will this meme die?
95% of feminists love porn and promiscuity because it turns sex as a tool they can use to gain leverage over men. It also breaks down the idea of a monogamous family structure, or "patriarchy" as they call it.
Only ones opposed to it tend to be fringe and are a minority.

>>137830745
at least explain who you think is larping

>>137831364
Of course you're a LARPer. You're not a Nazi or Ancap. You're too ignorant to be genuinely fighting for the white race, your whining goes against the principles of Ancap. You're bitching about the Constitution but you don't even know the very basics of it, like what it actually applies to.

>>137831562
what a ridiculous charge

when did I claim to be an ancap, are you seriously retarded?

I'm just asking why bakeries are different to ddos protection, please enlighten me

>>137814772
this guy comes across as a fart sniffing egotist

>>137814772
This has nothing to do with net neutrality, moron.

Net neutrality is about government policy concerning internet providers, contracts and rules for the industry.

Not specific private website hosting and their internal policies.

File: 1469739570836.jpg (12KB, 173x175px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 173x175px

>>137831902
yup, very rare to have these people in charge of major corps

>>137831863
Already explained the difference between ideological and physical discrimination. Sorry for using the wrong pronouns, guess you're just a butterball in a trailer salty that the niggers friend cucked you.

Idk how you can be on the same website as /b/ and not understand basic Internet security. Like do you all just sit on /pol/ crying all day? Your enemies aren't going to be nice to you or play by your ideals, take it into your own hands.

File: 1474928976634.png (58KB, 385x456px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 385x456px

>>137832173
>guess you're just a butterball in a trailer salty that the niggers friend cucked you
yes, I can see how being fat and in a trailer would discredit my opinion, how tolerant of you

just to get this straight, it's ok for web companies to discriminate against turd burglers, and it's not ok to refuse to make nazi cakes?

>>137832532
what are you talking about? I'm just asking about your hypocrisy. of course they are attacking, but they are trying to hold sand, and they will either be brought to heel by legal means, or alternatives will arise, and they will fall from grace

let me explain it to you fucktards

if you use someone elses service you agree to their terms regardless of whether or not "net neutrality" exists. And they can ban your ass off of their shit faster than you can say 9/11 was a jewish conspiracy

If you host your own server you can shitpost whatever you want and net neutrality would mean your shit-filled website would be as fast as your server can upload data.

Net neutrality has fucking nothing to do with freedom of speech on twitter or godaddy. Enjoy being a victim though.

>>137832173
>>137832532
come one, how does a bakery differ from ddos protection?

File: 15002283696362.jpg (94KB, 604x512px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 604x512px

>>137814772
>american culture
>say 'fuck' and 'ass' publicly and in written documents

>>137814772
Um he literally just said it was an "arbitrary decision" Doesn't that make them liable for a lawsuit?

>>137833117
Mommy they're breaking the Constitution though. Sieg heil, gas all the kikes

>>137833380
>I'm the CEO of a major internet services company

>excuse me whilst I sniff my own farts

I wonder if he will enjoy the dotr?

also I love how he tries to play up that he's still the destination for content neutral services after he just "arbitrarily" "kicked someone off the internet" because he was having a bad day and didn't reverse the decision. Fuck cloudfare and this is coming from someone who hates stormniggers.

>>137818443
>>137821473
>>137821972
>>137822215
It's on Tor.

File: 1470103113677.jpg (80KB, 421x636px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 421x636px

>>137833656
are there any alternatives yet? I might start one

File: 36c.jpg (49KB, 907x661px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 907x661px

>>137833852

File: 1479947908220.png (110KB, 2480x3508px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 2480x3508px

>>137833805
just giving a link to the .ru site atm

>>137833932
because ddos protection is so complicated that only one comapny can ever dew it?

oh wow, some anycasting? some filtering and dynamic fw rules? oh wow, if only I wasn't fat and in a trailer, maybe I could do it

might just force bakeries to make nazi cakes for every DS article instead

>>137833932
still no answer why bakeries are not ok to discriminate, but ddos is

>>137834350
bruh you can't even fucking spell. how are you going to code and launch a website from your shitty trailer?

File: 1478047771127.jpg (188KB, 667x782px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 667x782px

>>137834846
it's a fucking great trilar mang

if I wasn't so fat I'd challenge you to a dool

it's ok, my neetbux will pay for spelling corexion service

>>137835126
Don't meme me man. I bet you don't even have bitcoin-backed Pepe trading cards.

File: 1477977968650.png (340KB, 1889x1889px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1889x1889px

>>137835463
I can neither confirm or deny if I have such an item in my fat troller

I love how the NN narrative getting BTFO this hard has all the shills legitimately trying to rationalize this new information instead of continuing their trolls and baits.

And once again, the silicon valley companies are the ones to silence opinions long before the ISPs, in spite of their crying to the contrary.

>>137836321
Who could have imagined??

Oh wait, every open-source advocate for the last 30 years

We need to start our own conservative internet

>>137814772
Net neutrality = kike internet companies not wanting to get extorted by ISPs.

>>137836439
I just enjoy it when the hypocrisy bubbles to the surface and can be undeniably displayed to others.

File: 1474216205277.png (272KB, 696x537px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 696x537px

>>137836864
the tighter they grasp, the more sand runs through thir fingers

File: hidden_message.png (419KB, 1007x651px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1007x651px

>>137830384
what did they mean by this?