>very well documented European kings >Whities don't

>>137701340
because that is implied

>>137701493
Because we were busy going to space.

>>137701340
Because anyone who must say "we wuz kangs" was never a true kang

>>137701340

Only people with something to prove go around saying we waz kangs, desu.

>>137701340
We don't need to fabricate and rewrite history to prove it.

>>137701340
Because we know mate. We don't have to shout it like uncivilised niggers who want to try and make a point

File: 1454200728346.jpg (1MB, 2202x1879px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2202x1879px

>>137701340
Because in all reality most of us came from peasants and shit with only a few remarkable ancestors.

>>137701340
Everyone already knows we were kings. Blacks say we wuz kings to try to have something to be proud of. A lot of them don't even live with their fathers.

>>137701340

european know most people were serfs and the nobility ruling class still clings to their historic legacy, as such if you are not aware of such inheritance most probably your ancestors were feudal peasants plowing their lords land

claiming to be something you are not demands lack of modesty and self awareness, that's why it's a common occurrence among blacks

>>137701340
Why would we? Our cultures are the predominant ones in contemporary history, we don't have to cling to shit from a couple centuries ago.

>>137702119
We wuz empelols and sheet

File: wewuz.jpg (76KB, 591x791px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 591x791px

>>137703058

>>137701340
I tracked back my family back almost a millennia thanks to the church and no we wuz never kangz

But look at flag my people are the most royale in the world we had 100s of kangz and even today the ruler of the commonwealth is german

File: feest.jpg (27KB, 600x590px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x590px

>>137702006
>American kings

Actually, one of my ancestors was a knight. Sir Thomas I think it was

>>137701340

we're still kings