Libertarian morality is self-ownership- but most of our actions infringe upon the self-ownership of others...but what happens when we must infringe upon the self-ownership of others in orer to live...
The 5 degrees of morality:
1st Degree: Purely immoral action- infringing upon a person's self-ownership when such does nothing to preserve your own self-ownership.
2nd Degree: Infringing upon the self-ownership of a person who is unaware that they are enabling another to infringe upon your self-ownership.
3rd Degree: Infringing upon the self-ownership of a person who is aware that they are enabling another to infringe upon your self-ownership.
4th Degree: Infringing upon the self-ownership of a person who does you harm in order to limit the harm done to themselves.
5th Degree: Purely moral action- action which does not infringe upon the self-ownership of others.
The 5th is ideal, but all but the 1st are inline with libertarian morality.
Protecting one's race, insofar as such involves protecting oneself, is endorsed by libertarian morality.
Liberty is a White man's concept.
Common (not actual) libertarian thought rejects all violence, even when when the
rejection of violence is the rejection of self-defense- which is anti-life, and thus anti-libertarian.
Whether a bystander is wittingly or naively protecting your attacker, you have the right to preserve your life, even at the expense of said bystander.
Now, there is an argument that if the bystander is younger than you, and thus has longer to live, that accepting death (in order to allow the bystander to live) is the pro-life (and thus libertarian) option.
ONE CAN SIMULTANEOUSLY BE ALT-RIGHT AND LIBERTARIAN.
>>137546121
Libertarians put too much effort into conceiving a perfect world, at the expense of their own lives...there are no perfect actions in a perfect world.