We all know that it's fact and that most people are brainwashed into believing some fairy tale of equality, but it's never good to be unprepared for counterarguments.
What would be your best argument AGAINST race realism/bell curve/etc etc
Hurt fee fees
>>137541405
Which specific position on race realism?
A 100% genetic explanation for racial differences is the most easily debunked
>>137541846
Anything that's standard /pol/ fare, I guess. Easy target would be whites being the master race, second to none. Negroids barely being human
>>137542466
>Easy target would be whites being the master race, second to none
By which standard? It couldn't be anything genetic otherwise its clearly east asians
>Negroids barely being human
A good third of whites also wouldn't be human. Also a good topic that shows how incredibly reductionist /pol/ is on many issues. Africa is the most genetically diverse place on earth in regards to humans and intelligence is no exception. Blacks of different ethnicity score all over the map in terms of GCSE scores and actually score higher overall than white British. The populations you choose to look at can give you entirely different perspectives.
>>137543561
>>137542466