Why do right-wingers equate Keynesianism with socialism? Do you

Kayne? The guy who made the laws about trading/ work distribution?

>>137448801
Its commie bullshit about post scarcity.

>muh communism works great after enough people starve to death where they can live on roots and berries again

Its just a bunch of trash about sustain 2% growth.

>>137449074

This is the worst misrepresentation of Keynesianism I've ever heard.

>>137449074
>>137448801
Also all the improvement that has been made for the third world in terms of redistribution of wealth has been negated in the last few decades by the corresponding unsustainable population boom, which is now rotting even our countries from within. Starving niggers should be left to starve, thats how you stop starving niggers from starving. Feeding them makes MORE starving niggers.

>>137448801

Keynesianism isn't necessarily Socialism, but Socialism justifies its economic theory using Keynesian theory and functions.

Also, stop assuming you are smarter than everyone here.

only people who follow austrian economics do this

>>137449074
Yes, absolutely correct. You should tell as many people about this in real life as you can.

make-believe, just like socialism

Who cares about economics? Demographics is destiny.

Close the borders and we can hash out an economic model amongst our white selves.

>>137449467

This makes no sense. Keynesianism has nothing to do with socialism. You can't justify socialism with Keynesianism because Keynesianism is a theory of short-run behavior of the economy, not "long-run" behavior of the economy.

I understand I wanna fuck you

/pol/ doesn't like Keynesianism because it can be used to validate certain aspects of socialism and is backed up by facts and results instead of just giving rich jews a tax cut and calling keynesian economics (((unsustainable))). Reminder that both of the main US parties have had the same austrian economic tilt since Reagan exclusively because it's been lucrative for them, not because it works.

>>137448801
Hitler was keynesian

Keynesianism is basically the redistribution through anisotropic means of wealth from the middle class both to the working class and to the upper class. It's like a sandwich with no meat, but two fucking huge pieces of bread. It's socialism viewed through a prism lens.

>>137448801
But i would i smash windows to stimulate the economy, anon?

if its not capitalism its communism.

>>137448801
Austrian Economics > kikeynisian

Endless growth is a retarded concept. The end target is just a giant ponzi scheme.

>>137450259
This.

Taking people's money through inflation is no better than taking it through taxes.

>>137448801
>Do you people understand what Keynesianism is?

Yes. It's Jewish control of our economy.

File: keynes.jpg (37KB, 460x454px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 460x454px

Socialist always create a class of people that vote for bigger government and increased spending in the here and now, footing the bill to the future.

Keynesians are more then happy to oblige, instead of taxing you directly they just 'tax' you by ruining your wealth with inflation.

>>137451172

Are you retarded? Growth theory is outside the scope of Keynesianism. Keynesianism is a theory of the short run economy.

Indeed, perhaps the most famous economist of the twentieth century, J.M. Keynes, saw in economic growth the prospect that the very problem that was taken to be the essential economic problem - scarcity - would be abolished, so that economists would become largely redundant. In an essay written in the early 1930s, on the economic prospects for the grandchildren of adults then alive, Keynes was concerned to put in perspective the waste entailed in the then prevalent underuse of available resources, especially labor. If the means to avoid such waste could be found and adopted, Keynes argued, economic growth, i.e, increasing per capita gdp, at 2% per year would easily be attained and sustained. This, he pointed out, would mean that in one hundred years output would increase sevenfold. Scarcity would be abolished (muh post scarcity commie bullshit) and a situation would arise in which economics and economists were no longer important.

In the years following World War 2, most economists thought that Keynesian macroeconomics was the means to achieving FULL EMPLOYMENT (which Hitler actually had, but clearly NatSoc isnt the answer..) and sustained growth THROUGHOUT THE WORLD - (more commie bullshit)

-Natural Resources and Environmental Economics textbook

Its commie bullshit, its wrong, and National Socialism proves its wrong. If you knew anything about Natsoc, youd know why that only works in a nation, with non-shit blood people.

>>137448801
Right wingers are fucking stupid. Were you born yesterday?

>>137452398
The USA had 7% growth for decades on end under its free market before keynes came along.

>>137452660
>The USA had 7% growth for decades on end under its free market before keynes came along.
That isn't sustainable either, at least not if we want to stay on this planet

>>137451580
Monetarism was literally formulated by Jews though.

all that matters is neither work at all in practice

File: Hitler40.jpg (117KB, 501x604px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 501x604px

>>137452660
Without full employment, either. Its just horseshit. Hitlerian economics>Keynesian economics.

>>137448801
>>137448801
is that a real gurl

>>137448801
Only people who didn't read Capital can equate capitalist system with socialism.

File: karl-marx.jpg (90KB, 568x544px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 568x544px

>>137454728
Most these people havent read Mein Kampf, your commie bullshit comes after a long line of books, including ones on how to kill commies.

File: austrian-economics-chicago-or-monerarist-economics-classical-economics-new-keynesian-15711297.png (91KB, 500x698px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 500x698px

>>137448801
The same reason that the left equates "corporatism" with "austrian economics".

Left-wingers see everything as a stepping stone to "far-right corporatism".
>even though austrian is essentially the right-most limit, past corporatism

Right-wingers see everything as a stepping stone to "far-left socialism"
>even though communism is essentially the left-most limit, past all other forms of socialism

You both basically speak different languages, and that's why you both think the other one is constantly lying/insane. You refuse to agree on basic terms because you have become too divergent.

File: Racist-Buzzword-For-Anti-Communists.jpg (155KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 480x480px

>>137455243
Reminder that to be a communist, all you need to do is believe (falsely) that races are equal. If you are a racist, you are inherently anti-communist. If you are communist, well - its obviously youre anti-racist.

The word racist was created to be the opposite of communist. It might not be on an economic level, but were not talking economics here. Communism isnt just about economics, and neither is National Socialism. (which isnt even real socialism, not in terms of the economic aspect)

File: u3eu83zccqax.jpg (45KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x640px

>>137455745
Eh, you've oversimplified that a bit, but I know what you are trying to say.
>for example: An-caps might believe that races are equal but they aren't "communist".

I just hate how all of these terms are so imprecise & misused everywhere nowadays. We need to invent a new language to fix these defects.