Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
What is more important, ideology or race?
Would it not be easier to unite and convince all races that the problem lies in Marxism, communism, socialism and any ideology that preaches the end of tradition?
>>
>>137441659
>What is more important, ideology or race?
The is really no one simple answer for this.
Some ideologies, like marxism, are unsalvageable. Adherents deserve to be shot regardless of their race.
A certain degree of racial minorities is acceptable provided they assimilate and don't outbreed the host race.
I would not let the masses of non-whites in my country even if they 100% percent shared my views. Even if they are okay themselves, their shitskin children might be brainwashed into hating whites in future and turn against my children. Shitskins are easy target for brainwashed because they are often underachievers so they blame the whitey for all their failures. "Diversity" is always a weakness of every nation and minorities are the weakest link.
>>
>>137441659
Of course it's ideology but (((someone))) wants us at one another's throats instead of uniting against our common ((((enemy)))
>>
File: transparentthink.png (5KB, 473x454px) Image search:
[Google]
5KB, 473x454px
>>137441659
What's wrong with hedonism? You saying I can't use my own money to enjoy myself?
Sounds like a Lotta statist talk to me
>>
>>137441659
>What is more important, ideology or race?
Uhm BOTH, you cunt.
Fuck off.
SAGE.
>>
>>137443191
Not in the covenant of my community. Build your own community of hedonists and do not come and preach in mine.
>>
there will be no "right" to free speech in ancapistan. freedom of association will limit people's free speech and there's nothing we can do about that.
but without a state to infiltrate and wield its power, the stakes of controversial speech will be lower. individuals will be in control of their own protection and their own property. there is no police or army to carry out anybody's bad ideas.
our ideal of "free speech" is just a band-aid on the problem of having a state to begin with. if people can speak out against abuses, that could be a safeguard against tyranny (how's that workin' out for us?)
once the state is gone, "free speech" as a "right" is gone, but in effect speech will be much more tolerated.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3