Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: tumblr_m740qpP4Es1rq6ejuo1_500.gif (917KB, 500x220px) Image search:
[Google]
917KB, 500x220px
Ok so I'm mostly a /b/tard but saw there may be intelligent Convo here. After some perusing of threads, this just seems like an anti SJW page. So I have a question:
>What is wrong with trying to be nicer to everyone, and stop trying to offend others?
I mean I kinda get the anger towards Muslims, because they are an oppressive group. But why the aggression towards people who are just trying to live their lives equally? What is the downside to trying to evolve the world into a more peaceful place. Please don't give me the "someone will always be violent excuse".
>The world is covered in shit, so why not shit everywhere, hurr Durr
Yes the world is covered in shit. But in 200 years, with little centralized intervention, we have had the power to change it completely. If we worked just a bit more cohesively, don't you think we could fix it?
>Tldr: What is the benefit of working against a group, compared to working with a group, finding compromises, and living in harmony?
>>
>>137415776
>centralized intervention
D R O P P E D
Unless you mean literal facism led by a saint. Which you do not. You have to go back
>>
>>137416589
Please clarify for me. I am admittedly ignorant of your proposal.
>>
>>137416589
I would argue that even if some sort of "illuminatti" type organization exists, most people are uninvolved in that organization and due to man kind's unpredictability any attempt at organization or control would be difficult to manage, let alone maintain.
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2