Is Monarchism the best ideology that currently exists? And why

>>137409902
>Bad monarch comes in to power

Now what?

>>137410362
Overthrow

>>137410362
There's only a chance king will be bad, whereas democracy inevitably turns bad unless whole country is populated by intelligent people.

>>137409902
how applicable do you think it would be to modern technology and economy?

File: 1497775338113.jpg (75KB, 576x720px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 576x720px

>>137410501
then a republic (France eg.)

>>137410362
>King has power to elect an heir
>A good king won't elect a bad heir
Problem solved.

>>137409902
It never was.

>>137410781
thats more like a dictatorship

>>137410660
>unless whole country is populated by intelligent people

And has an honest and capable media.
And the political system manages to stop itself turning into it's own social class riddled with nepotism and sycophants.

>>137411026
If the people are intelligent, then media and politicians doing stupid things would lose credibility and went out of the game. But that's a big if.

>>137411571
Maybe. But also just look at how those in academia who should at least have above average intelligence can also support discredited ideologies such as communism.

File: 2Jedpx9.jpg (43KB, 1358x783px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1358x783px

>>137410732
No, new monarch.
Monarchy is the true centrism between the far left of national socialism and the far right of ancap.

>>137409902
I think some kind of eternal king would be best. Maybe a computer program or something that wouldn't change its view and love of its people. There is just too much influence from outlets to let ordinary people dictate things they have no idea over.

For example how women usually are single-issue voters, and that single issue is almost always some social "issue". Thats so burdensome on the greater good.

>>137409902
Monarchism is not an ideology.

>>137410923
I see no reason why for practical reasons there couldn't be democatic processes at the local government level. The minimal amount of government there is anyway.

>>137409902
i don't support (((bilderbergers)))

>>137409902

Britain is a monarchy and the Queen sits on her fat ass as the country is invaded by scum.

You're thinking of a dictatorship.

>>137412641
parliamentary monarchy is not real democracy

>>137411571
You have to factor in peoples moral inertia, i guess I'd call it.
The doubt that public figures would be up to such nefarious things as child sacrifice/bribery/blackmail etc.
It takes a lot of evidence to make people believe it, no matter how smart they are because they are distanced from them.

File: royalsiegheil.png (414KB, 806x522px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 806x522px

>>137409902
you wot mate, take that out the bin now.

>>137409902
Anyone who wants some modern concepts of right-wing monarchy should look up Charles Maurras and his "integral nationalism". In short, it's a nationalistic dictatorship of a monarch.

>>137412924
fuck i meant monarchy

>>137409902
Chekism is the best system

>>137410362
read Mandate of Heaven, you will understand. Bad monarch =/= monarchy is bad

Best example would be Russia, they had a single bad Monarch and then permanently destroyed their culture and country with communism. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater, as it were

File: charles-maurras-the-republican.jpg (72KB, 736x525px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 736x525px

>>137413008
Pic related

>>137409902
After seeing what happened after the English civil war, French revolution, Russian revolution etc. it's hard to make a case against it.

Also ban usury in the banks

>Letting some random dude have power over your life like a good cuck
>Ius primae noctis
Literally cucks.
I would rather have anarcho anything instead

>>137413395
anarchism doesn't work, get btfo hans

>>137409902
>monarchism
>ideology
even if it was...

>>137413563
Yeah, because of bootlicker people like you. Instead of being master of your own freedom, you would rather suck some monarchs dick like a good pleb.
Anarchism is the only acceptable ideology for any white male who loves his freedom. If you disagree you're either a cuck or nonwhite. Period.

>>137414183
> implying freedom is good

>>137413162
>read Mandate of Heaven
author?

>>137414183
why would i subscribe to an ideology that doesn't work? silly hans...

>>137414601
>bootlicker
Says the self serving faggot.

No.

>>137409902
The bible warns against kings and queens you dunce.
Stop worshiping men

File: o-SANDALS-2-570.jpg (150KB, 570x855px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 570x855px

>>137409902
Monarchy is shit. You're probably an American, if you are you're a traitor for suporting fucking monarchy.
>>137410501
So, mob rule? Great.
>>137413162
>they had a single bad Monarch
No, they never had a good monarch, every monarch is horrible. The family was long overdue for execution. An example of a system that replaced monarchy being bad isn't an argument for monarchy, just against communism.
>>137415034
Have you ever seen that princess yall got over there? Like, in person? Shes so cute

>>137409902
a truly benevolent monarch is the closest to utopia we can get

>>137414831
t.bootlicking swine