How does this not violate the Constitution?
It would be unconstitutional even if "God" existed.
>>137409760
The Supreme Court has already explained this. It's called "ceremonial deism."
>>137409760
>Why won't the world bend to the will of the loud minority for every single thing!!!!!
Don't you have a fedora to try on or something?
>>137409951
That's a trilby.
Why have a constitution at all if it can be freely ignored?
>>137410122
Majority want God on money. Deal with it. This isn't some commie shithole where one atheist who kills 40 million people but yet is the hero of the left decided things. We the people choose to have God on money. Dont like it? Go to Africa