You're nuts if you think SSM won't pass in this political

what does polling of general public opinion say?

>>137380381
Ironically 60% of people support SSM but something crazy like 70+% want a plebiscite to decide.

Pretty clear (((who))) doesn't want to have an equal vote.

>>137380207
>>137380381
>>137380447

>>137380429

>>137380207
Who cares.

Marriage is already dead in this country so the tradition argument holds no water at all.

No one takes it remotely seriously and everyone just does it "for loooooove" and not as a means of stabilising a relationship so that children will be raised in a good environment.

File: Pic.jpg (364KB, 957x1024px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 957x1024px

>>137380207

>>137380509
>made 3 minutes after

>>137380540
>if something isn't perfect then we should get rid of it

>>137380207
Still better than Canberra cock suckers all saying yes in parliament

>>137380207

It will pass by probably 60% yes vote, but I'm predicting such a low turnout due to people forgeting, or being too lazy to poat it back that the Libs can reasonably justify inaction by claiming "the low turnout is not necessarily indicative of the whole voting public" and they'll "take it to the election".

I reckon that was probably their intention with it all along

>>137380668
The argument that can be used to justify only allowing heterosexual couples to marry relies on the assumption that allowing non-heterosexual couples to marry will devalue it. It's already been devalued to effectively nothing so it's not a compelling argument at all.

If people still took marriage seriously I'd be against SSM but they haven't for decades.

>>137380207
whats wrong with same sex marriage, I seriously don't get it.
I'm economically conservative and socially conservative.
We should just legalise it and use it's legalisation as a tourist attraction, creating jobs and saving 120 mil on the plebiscite.

>>137380591
Yeah cuz I went to the trouble of finding related recent news links while you just posted a sideways piece of paper.