Alright fellow members of the /pol/ish resistance, anybody else

>>137356771
This will only radicalize them further.

>>137356771
lol getting my popcorn

>>137356771
Do they think giving him more free time will have a positive effect?

File: dealwithit.jpg (43KB, 300x535px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 300x535px

Sure.

Step One: Click this link:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfEYr_hMunVaqHNXCpv9oQIpY4_ghKLeAxytXI8H0PqXPr6Zg/viewform

Step Two: Report the following account:

https://www.patreon.com/yesyoureracist

Step Three: Select "Bullying"

Step Four: Explain that he is violating Patreon's TOS by soliciting personal information, posting it, and encouraging abuse.

Here are the three links to evidence that you can post:

https://twitter.com/YesYoureRacist/status/896411734617075712

https://twitter.com/YesYoureRacist/status/896713553666871296

https://twitter.com/YesYoureRacist/status/896492908416835584

>>137356771
I would hire a white nationalist before a liberal. At least I know the nationalist takes pride in his work.

File: 1460985713864.jpg (15KB, 640x407px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 640x407px

>>137356771
>evidence for the presence of others involved in this week's demonstration?
i got some
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keHJ6a9fcwY

>>137357953
How so? They will inevitably seek to undermine the productivity of your business by compromising the work of those not belonging to his given in-group, and even the business itself if it does not orient itself purely to the benefit of that in-group. He's just as detrimental to the thing as a liberal SJW.

>>137358750

>They will inevitably seek to undermine the productivity of your business by compromising the work of those not belonging to his given in-group,

Fuck off laffypole retard. You seriously think white nationalists are chasing around Indians and blacks with big sticks in their daily lives? 90% of the time you wouldn't be able to tell their appearance from a normie because we actively make an attempt to blend in.

>>137359053
Not chasing around, no - but whether actively or passively, your views will impact your engagement with whatever organisation you are involved with, and your capacity to cooperate with others within those organisations to achieve common goals. This is how biases function.

>>137359345

And yet strangely, these organizations can't identify these people without them being doxxed. It's almost like they are indistinguishable as an employee, which means they are as productive as their counterparts, and the only reason they are being fired is to save the company from potential boycotts.

>>137360063
Or, perhaps, this moment just removes plausible deniability from their ongoing behaviours.
If it's unjust, perhaps labour laws ought to be strengthened to protect the rights of workers against their employers~

>>137360682

>Or, perhaps, this moment just removes plausible deniability from their ongoing behaviours

You mean acting uncooperative and decreasing productivity is tolerated in a corporate environment if you aren't a white nationalist? You have never had a job you retarded laffypole faggot and it really shows.

>>137360951
I mean the clear intentionality behind it, and its directedness, are easier to mask. I've worked with a number of white nationalists and this has been consistent.

>>137356771
>controlled opposition looses his job
>bad
DAILY REMINDER THAT SKIN WORSHIP IS PAGANFAGGOTRY

>>137361440

> I've worked with a number of white nationalists

You haven't worked at all.

>I mean the clear intentionality behind it,

If you are discovered to be incompetent you will be fired or demoted to a position where you don't need to be competent to succeed. This is the way having a job works. No manager in the world who isn't himself in need of a sacking is going to sit there and watch you turn a four man job into an eight man one half the time and think "well he doesn't mean anything by it, let's keep him on."

>>137361927
This doesn't allow for the culture of persistent mediocrity that is fostered in most of the sites of employment where the bulk of immigrant workers tend to find themselves, bred of the absolute lack of incentive for a worker to produce more than the median of what could be desired of his labour.
>you havent worked
lol okay - says the man arguing with the naivete of a recent high school graduate

>>137363251

>This doesn't allow for the culture of persistent mediocrity that is fostered in most of the sites of employment

So basically you're saying that the mediocrity of a white nationalist's labour is indistinguishable from the mediocrity of basically any other employee, other than that he is a white nationalist (which is why it follows that they're never fired until being "doxed").

You're arguing yourself into a hole here, first you say that white nationalists get fired because they act as saboteurs in a work environment, then you say that they aren't fired before being doxxed because everyone else is performing at the same level as them anyway. If all the other workers are lowering themselves to the same level of mediocrity just above what would be an adequately poor performance for termination, as you say, why wouldn't they be fired too? If the white nationalist is under-performing intentionally because he doesn't want to work with Pajeet, and Pajeet is under-performing intentionally because he thinks he can get away with it, why would the white nationalist be fired but Pajeet not be fired? The reality of the situation is the performance in their roles has absolutely nothing to do with it, which is why your logic is so fucked.

The reason, the sole reason that they are fired, is that their being doxxed opens the doors to boycotts and potentially scares investors, which immediately makes them undesirable as an employee, even if they were employee of the month every month since they entered their position. Do I think it's unfair? No, the workplace looks out for themselves, and the nationalist new the risk before going outside without a mask.

>says the man arguing with the naivete of a recent high school graduate

You aren't even arguing at all. By your own "logic", everyone is intentionally being unproductive to meet the same baseline, yet somehow the white nationalist is a special case in any way other than what I've outlined?

>>137364677

knew*

>>137359345
lol no

File: we secret gays now.jpg (45KB, 750x766px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 750x766px

>>137364677
Because narrative highlights consistency in patterns of indolence that allow it to appear outlined against data that would otherwise subsume it
and publicly declaring affiliation with white nationalist groups suggests narrative

File: 1500870275054.jpg (52KB, 760x760px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 760x760px

>>137365359

>that allow it to appear outlined against data that would otherwise subsume it

Dumbest thing I've ever heard. In your world, the other data that would subsume the nationalist's productivity is there because everyone is intentionally lazy to meet their minimum expectations. The "narrative" you speak of, is the line of thinking that "this man is meeting the same standards of almost every other coworker out of MALICE, therefore he should be fired for not being productive enough" yet they wouldn't fire every other employee who is performing the same out if their own intentional laziness? Highly educated people get paid enormous amounts of money to come up with programs and schemes to improve workplace productivity and shift the baseline of productivity upwards, we don't need or want a perpetually unemployed laffypole incel to do it for free.

Here's the reality: Either the white nationalist's productivity stands out as being exceptionally poor or it doesn't. If it is indistinguishable from almost everyone else because people are lazy as you so kindly pointed out then clearly the corporation should be incentivizing higher productivity to shift up the baseline, or perhaps get a better vertical deviation of productivity. If the white nationalist truly was acting as a saboteur he would continue to lag behind. the rest of his peers.

The fact that this doesn't happen and they aren't fired until being doxxed means one of two things: Either they perform perfectly adequately and are being fired for the specific reasons I outlined, or we go with your theory that only you in all your wisdom, living the Karl Marx lifestyle of budging off your friends and family while endlessly pontificating can come to the astonishing realization that all but the most exceptional of people will follow the path of least resistance in their endeavors.