>alt-right >condemn the alt-right >alt-right is affiliated

How does it not exist? Spencer proudly claims that shit and points to the fact that HE is the "founder" of it, he coined the term a long time ago.

>>137281034
>the "alt-right" doesn't really exist.

why does /pol/ keep throwing this around? The fucking people you look up to acknowledge it.

File: antifa.jpg (96KB, 702x691px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 702x691px

>>137281129

>hurr durr Richard Spencer

>>137281129
>>137281392
Who?

>>137281392
>The fucking people you look up to acknowledge it.
nobody except the larp-right looks up to e-c*lebs

>>137281428

Okay? Make a point or shut the fuck up, it quite literally DOES exist and got rekt harder than anything I've ever seen in a single day. Are you some butthurt nazi larper?

File: 1502310996398.jpg (599KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 1280x1280px

>>137281392
If by "alt-right" you mean "a well defined political organization" then no, nothing like that exists
If by "alt-right" you mean "anti-establishment conservatives" then yes the alt-right kind of is a thing, but since the establishment is primarily comprised of neocons, the label "alt" seems rather foolish
>people you look up to
if you were thinking of an e-celeb you need to lurk more or kys

"words don't have meaning" - op

>>137281934
I think the issue is that liberals are hoping that "alt-right" is a blanket term for all of their political opponents, and that by attacking and defeating this group they'll somehow be ultimately victorious.

That's all without really appreciating that the "alt-right" is at best a small group of oddjobs that have accepted the label that liberals have conjured up, when the vast majority of conservatives, and even young conservatives, really don't identify with the label or even the concept of the label.