>>137246238 >you will never smell those fingers

Free trade and free markets with a healthy safety net are the best way to run an economy.

BRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPP

>>137246238
I may be mentally ill because every time I see a glorious bum like that I think "boy I wish I was her." Maybe some form of narcissism.

In any case, just read a book on basic economics.

>>137246238
It's shit
Fascism is the way forward

>>137246238
read the Thomas Sowell book

It isn't sustainable in the long run (compared to other social system we've known in history). Sure it's super productive and everything, but the faster it turns, the more it's loosing ground under it's feet leading to a kind of social desintegration.

Bad if you want to preserve national integrity and don't like immigration.

You can't contain capitalism at a national level. Capitalism is by its own logic a destroyer of boundaries and differences.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-j1Dg2nKKY

File: donald_duck_boner.jpg (81KB, 567x461px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 567x461px

MUH DICK

The best economic system known to man. It's only bad if you're retarded.

File: xmgyonq.jpg (18KB, 600x315px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 600x315px

>>137246238
Capitalism only works in the public interest if it's contained within an ethical framework. Things like vigorous antitrust, ethical consumer and worker protections, and an economic model where private gains are reasonably enjoyed by workers as well as executives are not natural to capitalism (they are socialist devices), but we see them as important parts of a sustainable capitalist model. Without them, in the long run, only the financiers and owners in the economy profit from unbridled capitalism, and at the expense of a consumer class unable to leverage any political power to buttress the public interest

>>137246238
the worst economic system in the world except for every other one.

>>137247615
Our US system can we described as crony (or state) capitalism, where the owners and financiers in our economy have managed to entrench themselves against natural competition by buying access to policymaking, and essentially privatize the economic gains for themselves while socializing their losses (see bailouts and corrupt contract acquisition processes). Beware the lawmakers who cry for cutting regulations, and companies that call themselves job creators, there's a reason they need to throw obscene sums of money at politicians to convince them to sing their tune - it's because the policy positions they desire go against the public good, and no one would want to advocate them pragmatically