>muh It's happening >muh breaking news Lets cut the

Idk lol.
Fuck all yall niggas ill just move to the mountains and become a farmer.

File: 1502171303440.gif (1MB, 498x272px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 498x272px

>>137005669
Idk

>>137005809
yuh same i dont fuck with this

>>137005669
> what happens?
Nothing. Your president just makes words on twitter and your media takes them too seriously like this is the first time.

>>137005669
People are acting like it would be WW3.
Norks nuke Seoul, bomb the shit out of the rest of SK but get taken down in the few days by the U.S while china just watch. Daily lives of the fat autists here is left completely unchanged. Only interesting part is what they will do with nork land afterwards.

>>137005669
I hope Kimmy takes out commiefornia before getting annihilated.

>>137005669
US respond with tactical nuclear tipped missiles annihilating Kims military within 1 hour, no joke.

>>137006098
Idiot. The problem is in Houston and Dallas. THOSE need to be glassed.

>>137006253
Elaborate

>>137005669
North Korea launches 4 missiles. All of them fail to reach their targets except for one. It lands in Guam and fails to detonate.

The US proceeds to nuclear holocaust North Korea and the rest of the world is pissed off about it forever

>>137006337
It is the only sure way of preventing catastrophe in Seoul, think about it.

>>137006093
They'd occupy it for a few years and reunification would occur. Most likely nork civies would turn into China's version of our illegal immigrant problem.

But after it would all settle down nork people would start to be apart of the south's economy. Better living conditions, etc.

>>137005669
USA uses minor conventional weapons on critical targets in a show of force just like the Syria strike, but actually hitting something.

>>137006376
Interesting. I think it would be a very limited nuclear response though. We won't waste our big boy nukes on a target that isn't important. Nuclear tipped tomahawks would be used, fired from boomer subs

>>137006506
Yeah sure but then china would be directly bordering a western ally. Probably unlikely they'd do anything for a while though.

>>137006093
No

>Norks nuke Seoul

>nuke

Let's assume you meant shelling, and not nuking. Because a nuke has a high chance of creating so much confusion that it'd lead to the whole world enacting MAD instantly due to comms not being so ready and available at the given time. Israel would nuke its neighbors. Same thing goes for India and Pakistan. Etc.

However, if you meant shelling things are just slightly better than the aforementioned scenario. South Korea is an economic powerhouse. The markets would most likely instantly crash, and the world can't afford to lose Seoul and its inhabitants. So in the confusion it could easily lead to WW3.

>bomb the shit out of the rest of SK but get taken down in the few days by the U.S while china just watch

Are you sure? Would China be willing to let them get glassed by the US? What you think would happen after the war has a high chance of happening during it, with China either wanting to install another dictator to keep the regime as is, pissing off the west, or just outright helping Kim as a last resort.

Kim knows that he's fucked no matter what, but he also knows he can deal some damage before going out.

North Korea launches at Japan, fails to hit target, but detonates.
US uses Rods from God, totally annihilating Nork front line defense and command structures.

>North fires Nuke
>it fails
>China zerg rushes into North Korea before America can respond
>China lets the US know they have removed Kim from power
>Trump launches the nukes anyway and says "Tell them we didn't get their message."

File: SR-72.jpg (1MB, 3181x1671px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3181x1671px

>>137005669
FIRE AND FURY LIKE THE WORLD HAS NEVER SEEN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntLsElbW9Xo

>>137005975

This.

>>137006895
>Because a nuke has a high chance of creating so much confusion that it'd lead to the whole world enacting MAD instantly due to comms not being so ready and available at the given time. Israel would nuke its neighbors. Same thing goes for India and Pakistan. Etc.
Wow, so this, is the power, of huehuehue.

>South Korea is an economic powerhouse
Yeah no shit Adam, but even if it's an other 2008 all in all the autists here wont be affected much, or at lease not for very long.

>>137006895
Shit I missed the china part
Are you seriously implying china would in any case attack their biggest trade partner because they have some very vague ties to some stupid uppity despot neighboring them? They probably don't want a western ally bordering them but that's about it. Maybe they will in fact just place an other shitty despot, but then were just back to square one.

>>137005669
Many civilian casualties in and around Seoul right at the beginning. SK military comes off the chain like a rabid pitbull and rolls north reuniting the peninsula in record time. US plays backup with one eye on China and one hand on the nuclear holster. Japan standing by.

>>137007336
>another 2008

Bitch do you think Seoul turning into a waste with conflict likely spilling over to Japan is just "another 2008"? If it's just a brief regime change so nobody adopts a war economy, it's over. You'll be in a bread line.

Also, I stand by what I said. Everyone would lose their shit over a nuke launch, I can guarantee you. And tensions are already high because both China and now Russia detest the US.

>>137005669
i cum so fucking hard it can be herd for miles

>>137005669

Comfy happening threads on an unprecedented scale

>>137005975
This. Nothing will happen.

>>137007977
Top kek

>>137008098
Well this of course, but the OP premise is that something actually happens.

>>137007600
>Maybe they will in fact just place an other shitty despot, but then were just back to square one.

mhmm that's exactly what I said they'd want to do. But if it comes down to it they'll put their asses on the line for Nork clay, yes. It becomes a poltical dispute that'll have them weakened before the US if they lose. They wouldn't declare war on the US, but they'd scream from the other side of the border and arm Kim if they think it's absolutely necessary for their grip on the region. As you yourself said, they don't want another satellite there.

>>137007861
>now russia
kek, they always fucking did

>whole of south korea
"nuking seoul", with the nukes the norks have, would mean of the city is perfectly intact and a small portion is contaminated for a few years, s well a shells falling in a few other cities. probably a few hundred thousand deaths.

>You'll be in a bread line
Huehuehue?

File: almost.gif (2MB, 204x204px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 204x204px

>>137005669
thats just another cuba's missile crysis. nothing will happen

My thoughts are that spam should be saged or reported.
But I am loving the MSM discrediting itself by pretending that Trump is pissing away sone magical and hitherto unsuspected North Korean good will.

>>137008203
>mhmm that's exactly what I said they'd want to do
>in fact
MHMMMM MHMMM woah

File: Trump-bomb-1.png (2MB, 1920x1056px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1056px

>>137005669

That just an old B-1 bomber.

It only holds 24 nuclear bombs...

Bwahahhahahhahahhhahaaa!

I will genuinely just be happy to post on /pol/ about the day this happened and how i was itt

>>137008322
would mean most of the city is perfectly intact*

>>137005669
Just heard this on 8992

GENCFNERABGTNL

>>137008596
Elaborate faggot. WHAT DO THE NUMBERS MEAN MASON. REEEEEEEEEEEEE

I want to hear if there's gonna be a nice cage match of good ol' global thermonuclear war

>>137005669
We sit here and shitpost about it. It's not like any of us serve in the military.

>>137005669
>let's cut the what-ifs and what if
fucking kys

>>137008322
>kek, they always fucking did

Well, it seemed like relations were headed for a thaw but now Russia more or less thinks Trump is just the continuation of Obama. That or that he's failed to keep the neocons and democrats in check.

>"nuking seoul", with the nukes the norks have, would mean of the city is perfectly intact and a small portion is contaminated for a few years, s well a shells falling in a few other cities. probably a few hundred thousand deaths.

You're right, the norks don't have so much in the way of nukes. But you bet they'd also shell it conventionally anyway, Seoul would still be levelled.

>You'll be in a bread line

That's what happens when the market crashes and your economy can't function, leaf.

RODS
OF
GOD

>>137008695
US Military sends coded messages, don't ask me how to decode them.

File: Bomb_Shelter_kit.jpg (126KB, 800x687px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 800x687px

Of course, if you are smart, you will get off /pol/ and get over to the hardware store right fucking now!

>>137006908
>>137007116

Trump said fire and fury the likes of which the world has never seen.

I demand the rods from god or some tesla death weapon mounted on a satellite, the worlds already seen nukes.

>>137008919
>That's what happens when the market crashes and your economy can't function, leaf.
Yeah, if it comes to 1930's level, you socialist mongrel. Basically Brazilian everyday reality.

>>137009188
> if it comes to 1930's level

A proper crash with a chance of actual war would make it even worse than the 30s. Not to mention the people who actually want a crash, and the fact that the world depends so much on some certain key countries, like mine for example. On the other hand, I don't think anybody would care if the maple syrup caribou fields were nuked.

>>137006093
the USA and the UN would hunt down all the NK generals and higher up for nuking SK... they will be living in hidden bunker palaces for a few years till food runs out, then they will mass anhero

>>137010129
>like mine for example
HEY, WHERE ARE YOU BRAZIL? Where the ever living fuck is brazil guys?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Eight

>>137010463
Point is the lives of most of the faggots here would remain unchanged while they keep posting bunker DIY.

>>137010653
well yes, more than likely my life wouldn't change... as long as the the $ stays strong.
Soon i'll be living in upstate NY 40+AC and capable of being off grid.

File: jkalsjf.jpg (12KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 251x242px

>>137008471
>That just an old B-1 bomber.
>It only holds 24 nuclear bombs...

The US govt has said multiple times that they are specifically using the B1 because it cannot hold any of our current bombs from our nuclear arsenal. They don't want to squinty eyed bastards to mistake our intentions as we specifically avoid the use nuclear weapons.

>>137011140
F/A 18s can carry B83s. And the Regan is docked in Japan.

File: donald-trump-laughing.jpg (49KB, 1024x536px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1024x536px

>>137011140
>The US govt has said multiple times

"Previously up to 24× B61 or B83 nuclear bombs could be carried." - Unless new orders are given...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockwell_B-1_Lancer

Of course, just one B-2 would wipe out NK before breakfast...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbI1fULINek

The B-1's would come in after for that:

"But wait, theres MORE!" deal....

>>137012408
Didn't the Serbs shoot a B-2 down?
NVM, that was an F-117
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_F-117A_shootdown

File: DrStrangelove.jpg (116KB, 1600x1102px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1600x1102px

>>137011140
>using the B1 because it cannot hold any of our current bombs from our nuclear arsenal.

Let me tell you how the conversation will go...


Will the B-1 still carry nuclear weapons?

Sir: The B-1 was required to have a bullet button installed on it under Obama in order to make it incapable of carrying nuclear weapons sir!

Can that be defeated?

Sir! We actually never gave enough of a fuck about anything Obama said to ever install any of the buttons, sir!

So.... Back to my original question....

Sir, We can have 30 B-1s fully loaded with B83s in the air to North Korea within 30 minutes, SIR!

Excellent!!!