http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-con tent/uploads/2012/02/Psy

>>136969850
When will /pol/ learn that right wingers are the niggers of the white race?

>>136970434
>Brown right wingers don't exist.

File: racegender.png (38KB, 372x583px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 372x583px

>>136971017
They might as well not exist. It's the wh*tes who are responsible for the current situation in the United States, for example.

File: jews-history.jpg (4MB, 2370x3500px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2370x3500px

>>136969850
>2012
Why are niggers in Noway browsing gay twitter?
Anyway, subsequent research has shown that more intelligent people tend to be MORE RACIST, they're just better at "cloaking" it. And even if they were free in modern society to be more open about it, I'm sure it wouldn't change the fact that racism is nothing more than "observing patterns", which is what highly intelligent people do. Certainly, a person of inferior intelligence would fail to notice patterns because there were emotional rewards put in place by "anti-racist" society for such willful ignorance. All the smartest men of history were openly racist, for what it's worth.


https://academic.oup.com/socpro/article-abstract/63/1/21/1846173/Are-Smart-People-Less-Racist-Verbal-Ability-Anti?redirectedFrom=fulltext

>>136973397
>Results suggest that high-ability whites are less likely than low-ability whites to report prejudicial attitudes and more likely to support racial equality in principle. Despite these liberalizing effects, high-ability whites are no more likely to support a variety of remedial policies for racial inequality.
Sounds less racist to me. Did you just assume that I wouldn't bother reading the link?

>>136969850
It's pretty simple to explain. A greater intelligence up to a certain point also makes you more susceptible to brainwashing. In the same way that you can only read a propaganda poster if you can actually read.

People who are between 80 - 100 points will more likely shape their ideas by their experiences rather than information they read in a book or from a lecture. People with superior intelligence of >120 points will see through poor arguments made in mainstream sources of information and will directly look for the statistics or logic and interpret the data themselves. They won't let someone else interpret the data for them thus removing the subjective argumentation.

>>136969850
WRONG

https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/535158/

>>136974517
What if we archive that
https://unvis.it/theatlantic.com/amp/article/535158

File: 18766854_823759611106464_3623352198448740473_o.jpg (87KB, 1074x1075px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1074x1075px

>point out that uneducated whites are racist
Just get more education and you won't be racist!

>point out blacks commit a fuckton of crime
It's because they're poor and lack opportunities!

>point out poor whites are more likely to interact with poor blacks, probably causing the racism

>>136974517
>Individuals who had a greater capacity for abstract reasoning experienced more contact with out-groups, and more contact predicted less prejudice.
Really makes you think

>>136969850
>liberals are smart
>conservatives are dumdums

This never stops being retarded

>>136974571
Yeah what if

>>136974675
>If science doesn't support my opinions, it's dumb
Your post is proving the study right

>>136969850

Great, so the high IQ liberal response is to import low IQ nigger population with poor abstract-reasoning skills.

>>136974861
>muh science

Like trannies are mentally ill and Blacks have low IQ & prone to criminality? Oh I forgot, the """smart""" liberals only like selective science

>>136975006
Yeah, you just keep perpetuating that "illiterate conservative" stereotype, maybe it will stop being true if you keep at it long enough

File: brain_size.gif (252KB, 550x563px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 550x563px

>>136973907
>Did you just assume that I wouldn't bother reading the link?
I assumed you would understand it was describing "giving the outward appearance of anti-racism" while holding racist attitudes:
>to support racial equality IN PRINCIPLE
Implying what, do you think?
>Despite these liberalizing effects
So, despite being taught anti-racism...
> high-ability whites are no more likely to support a variety of remedial policies for racial inequality
Probably because they're aware that equality is one of those leftist unicorns that can't actually materialize in nature. For example, you read this article but you had such low comprehension, you thought it supported YOUR position more. I can try a few more times to point it out to you, but you're already demonstrating too low of an IQ to discuss the topic. I assumed you were posting in English because you spoke English, but perhaps it's not your strength.

>>136974861
>science doesn't support my opinions, but i'm too dumb to notice
Well said.

File: 100% bait.png (77KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 625x626px

>>136975142
>too illiterate to read a science publication
>calls everyone illiterate
It's a slide thread folks, do not bump.

>>136969850
But remember IQ is an arbitrary social construct.

File: aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAyMy85MzAvb3JpZ2luYWwvcmFjZS1mYWNlLW9mZi0xMjAxMjYuanBn.jpg (63KB, 660x495px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 660x495px

>>136973397
>durr hurr somebody in past said not bathing was healthy therefore its true

And right wingers wonder why people think they're retarded.

>>136975198
So where does it say that more intelligent people are MORE racist, exactly? I read the discussion part on sci-hub and didn't see anything like that in the study.

>>136975304
Literally no scientist believes in the concept of race or will say people who seek racial equality are actually racist.

You're just twisting the facts in an attempt to not admit left wingers are on average smarter than right wingers.

File: nazi_leader_iqs.jpg (717KB, 1399x837px) Image search: [Google]

717KB, 1399x837px

>>136975336
>All arguments inevitably are invalidated by time
Mexican intellectuals, folks.

>>136975420
lol I'm not your English tutor, spend more than 30 seconds activating your almonds and it will become obvious.

>>136975608
Well the study does literally say that "Are smart people less racist? The findings from this study suggest that there is no simple answer
to this question." so I don't know what the fuck you are on about. I think you just googled something that looked like it agreed with you and then went with it without actually reading any of it.

File: subspecies.png (417KB, 956x863px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 956x863px

>>136975532
>Literally no scientist believes in the concept of race
MOST scientists believe in the concept of race.
>tl;dr
It's fun when we encounter unironic SJWs around here. Are you the mexican jew from the thread a few weeks ago?

>>136975142
You keep perpetuating that "fart huffing" liberal stereotype that science is fantastic until it triggers you. Reality has a Conservative bias, libcuck

File: 1497472988410.gif (141KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 250x250px

>>136975734
>Published in 1980

You might as well talk about phrenology, Adolf.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/looking-in-the-cultural-mirror/201109/the-main-reason-races-don-t-exist

>>136976005
>race doesn't exist
>but White people are racist and brown people need affirmative action

Really pops my corn

File: file.png (78KB, 657x464px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 657x464px

>>136975705
You're really going to make me hold your hand and walk you paragraph by paragraph through the paper?

>>136976005
>If it was published before I was born it's invalid
Mexican intellectuals, folks.

>>136969850

Here it comes.

>This study doesn't fit my emotions or narrative! The jews did this!

>>136976088
See, this is how I know you got low IQ.

If you classified people who are left handers as a different race, they'd suffer from discrimination as right handers are the dominant group.

Race doesn't exist from a biological standpoint but as a social construct it exists.

That' why when academia says they want to abolish "whiteness" they're not talking about genocide, but just eliminating the concept itself so people can be happy and learn to love each other.

>>136976270
>ignores OP getting BTFO by evidence or counter arguments
>says "da joos" before anyone else
Predictable distraction when you idiots are losing lel

>>136976216
But the study doesn't make the argument that smarter people are more racist at any point. Just reading the abstract you could almost assume that it could make the argument that they are just as racist, but they don't make do that in the actual study either. It literally says that the study doesn't answer the question whether or not smarter people are less racist. You are drawing conclusions that just aren't there.

File: 1500820672970.jpg (104KB, 718x718px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 718x718px

>>136969850
>IQ matters now that it can be used by liberals as a weapon

>>136976270
Is this coming from someone who thinks white Privelge is real and white people are ebil boogeyman?

>>136976417
>race doesn't exist from a biological standpoint

Then explain the gif
>>136975198
Bean nigger

File: race_is_real.png (618KB, 757x647px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 757x647px

>>136976417
>this is how I know you got low IQ.
You believe in IQ? That's problematic.
>If you classified people who are left handers as a different race
Implying race doesn't exist? I thought we already settled that.
>Race doesn't exist from a biological standpoint but as a social construct
Nope, guess not. Mexican intellectuals, folks.

>>136976699
Imagine being a Bean nigger. 100s of years ago you know nothing but sacrificing thousands to the moon god, then you get your shit fucked up by superior Europeans who forever changed your genealogy with Euro-admixture, and continue to cuck you into the future by making you speak a European language, that you become so cucked to the point you actually argue "race isn't real" on /pol/ LMAO

File: 1501005461635.png (218KB, 800x975px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 800x975px

>>136976417
>race doesnt exist from a biological standpoint.
Hahaha, be quiet, taco vendor.

File: 1460305017080.png (237KB, 962x562px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 962x562px

Well, this thread doesn't have to go to waste entirely. I think we can salvage it. This is now a redpills thread.

=========================================================
This bibliography is for those replying to claims that "there is no scientific basis for the biological reality of race". A good summary of what constitutes a sub-species / race can be found in Daniel Hatrl and Andrew Clark's 'Principles of Population Genetics'4th Ed., page 121:

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1498107757841.png
https://archive.org/details/B-001-001-062

See also, Sean Last's rebuttal of RationalWiki:
https://archive.is/A5CsE

On the drift toward the extreme political Left in the social sciences:
https://archive.is/VchiG

As always, please refer to http://humanbiologicaldiversity.com for more examples.

>>136977185
Please respond to my post, you must have missed it.

>>136976699
>>136977181

She's a mexican Leftist. She will never understand reason and probably is an amlo cuck.

>>136976576
You haven't answered our questions Bill.

Are left wingers smarter on average than right wingers?

Yes ( )
No ( )

File: 1479245028596.jpg (100KB, 940x515px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 940x515px

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races. Source:
http://pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf

Genetic analysis “supports the traditional racial groups classification.” Source:
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

“Human genetic variation is geographically structured” and corresponds with race. Source:
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html

Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals. Source:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622

Oral bacteria can be used to determine race. Source:
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

Race can be determined via brain scans. Source:
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2815%2900671-5

>>136977259
>Pls respond

>>136977181
/thread

>>136969850
I was always ahead of my classmates until they bumped me up with the other white kids instead of keeping me in gen pop with the blacks and beans.

I was also a liberal until my 20s

File: 1479245112749.jpg (501KB, 1052x1319px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 1052x1319px

>Morning 2008 - HS Biology Textbook:
http://sociology.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1043/2008_Reconstructing_Race_in_AJS.pdf
>Lieberman 2004 - Survey of Physical Anthropologists:
http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/8770
>Kaszycka on Race in Eastern and Western Europe:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x/abstract
>Chinese views on Race in 2001:
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/on-the-concept-of-race-in-chinese-biological-anthropology-alive-and-well.pdf
>Lieberman 1992:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660290308/abstract

>>136977350
No, because they deny reality. Education does nit equate intelligence, it just means you're easily Indoctrinated and susceptible to propaganda

>>136977448
It's a bit rude to leave me hanging. The least he could do is admit that he was wrong.

>>136977605
If that's the case, why do right wingers have worse abstract reasoning skills and lower general intelligence?

>>136969850
Jesus, haven't had a chance to post this in over three years.

Thanks for the supremely stale meme OP

>Low IQ & Liberal Beliefs Linked To Poor Research?
>How did they prove that idiots and conservatives are racists? They gathered two large data sets from the UK, one started in 1958 (NCDS), the other in 1970 (BCS); about 16,000 individuals in total, roughly equal numbers of males and females. The quizzed the groups when they reached 11 and 10 years old on their “intelligence”; they then came back to these individuals when they were 33 and 30 and asked them about their “socially conservative ideology and racism.”
>When the kids became 33 and 30 year olds, they were asked whether they agreed with 13 or 16 questions like, “Schools should teach children to obey authority”, “Family life suffers if mum is working full-time.”
>Another question was, “None of the political parties would do anything to benefit me.” Is agreeing or disagreeing with that a “conservative” position? What would the Occupy people say? Another, “Being single provides more time to experience life and find out about yourself.” Conservative or liberal?

>According to the NCDS (pdf), there were about 50 questions, of which only 13 were used. A “conservative”, then, is whatever Hodson and Busseri say it is. The same thing goes for what a “racist” is.

>What makes the study ludicrous, even ignoring the biases, manipulations, and qualifications just outlined, by the authors’ own admission the direct effect size for “g” on “racism” is only -0.01 for men and 0.02 for women. Utterly trivial; close enough to no effect to be no effect, their results statistically “significant” only because of the massive sample size.
http://wmbriggs.com/post/5118/

>>136976005
>links a social science journal.
talk to forensic anthropologists or doctors or organ transplant specialists about whether race exists you fucking spic

>>136977605
>>136977743

Coincidentially, there's a correlation between IQ and School Achievement.

Its common for stupid people to think they already know everything without researching things first. They always rely on personal experience.

File: quote-education-is-a-system-of-imposed-ignorance-noam-chomsky-218795.jpg (53KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 850x400px

>>136977743
Right Wingers have mote abstract reasoning skills and higher general intelligence. Liberals are constrained by political correctness, and it's why they make great slaves

File: minnesota_transracial_adoption.jpg (467KB, 843x843px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 843x843px

>>136977638
You want me to admit the study I posted says the opposite of what it says because it BTFO'd your entire thread. I'm not going to admit the grass is blue and sky is green over your loss. Heres a (you) you degenerate bugchasing faggot, lurk more before you post -- learn to fucking read.


(2001) Thompson et al., conclude in their own words that, "A genetic continuum was detected in which brain structure was increasingly similar in subjects with increasing genetic affinity. Genetic factors significantly influenced cortical structure in Broca's and Wernicke's language areas, as well as frontal brain regions," and, "Preliminary correlations were performed suggesting that frontal gray matter differences may be linked to Spearman's g, which measures successful test performance across multiple cognitive domains (p < 0.05). These genetic brain maps reveal how genes determine individual differences, and may shed light on the heritability of cognitive and linguistic skills, as well as genetic liability for diseases that affect the human cortex."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11694885

This further suggests that brain structure, size, and cognitive performance are all heritable and genetic.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079384/

(2011) Joshi et al., study twins to conclude that there is a highly significant genetic contribution to cortical thickness and volume. This is believed to have a significant effect on the neurotubule number and density in individuals and thus a highly significant effect on IQ.

In their own words, "The results showed detailed pointwise genetic and environmental contributions on the whole cortex. Several areas in the parietal and frontal lobes were observed to be genetically influenced."

The environmental factors are believed to be heavily genetically influenced due to how genetics define interaction and determine developmental reactions in the brain.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22713927

File: Noam-Chomsky-Quotes-4.jpg (73KB, 582x307px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 582x307px

>>136978197
Are you sure about that, bean nigger?

File: 1464414667839.png (372KB, 962x578px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 962x578px

The environmental factors are believed to be heavily genetically influenced due to how genetics define interaction and determine developmental reactions in the brain.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22713927

(2012) Yang et al., conclude that there is a, "greater than 80%," genetic contribution to the prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain associated with reward, attention, short-term memory tasks, planning, and motivation.), a significant genetic contribution to the temporal lobe (the part of the brain associated with Visual memory, language comprehension, and emotion association), a significant genetic contribution to the occipital lobe (dubbed the visual processing center of the mammalian brain), and a nearly 80% environmental influence on the parietal lobe (the part of the brain associated with touch, hand-eye coordination, spatial sense, and navigation).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963424

1950 UNESCO Statement on Race.
http://www.honestthinking.org/en/unesco/UNESCO.1950.Statement_on_Race.htm

The science was settled by proclamation, not study.

File: 4_more_variation_within.png (100KB, 900x558px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 900x558px

(2012) Rushton concludes that there has been no narrowing in the mean Black-White IQ difference predicted by heritable g.

Rushton also invalidates research by Nisbett, Dickens, and Flynn that show black gains in IQ by evaluating their lack of data and use of specious arguments. He shows that the little data they had to prove these points obscured the topic by invoking alleged age and social class interactions and adoption studies of very young children. Their data was based on ideas, not observations. In his own words on the twin studies cited: "There is no evidence of any special cultural influence, such as extreme deprivation or being raised as a visible minority, that operates in one group and not in others."

He shows using a meta-analysis that there has been no reduction in the mean racial differences between Blacks and Whites and that all claims of, "systemic issues," are spurious and unsupported by factual evidence. The credence given to researchers saying that society is to blame for the failures of adopted Blacks comes from a cursory glance at a specious statement - they have no evidence.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289605000917

>>136977954
That's a long blog post. I'll read it and get back to it, but I sincerely doubt that some random blogposter found something that got past a respected journal's peer review.

>>136978244
>You want me to admit the study I posted says the opposite of what it says because it BTFO'd your entire thread.
The study literally fucking says "Are smart people less racist? The findings from this study suggest that there is no simple answer to this question."

That's not a paraphrase, that's an exact quote. Are you just pretending to be retarded? Is spamming irrelevant links after you get BTFO in order to hide your embarrassment some kind of a defense mechanism for you?

>>136977994
>talk to forensic anthropologists or doctors or organ transplant specialists about whether race exists you fucking spic

I have and some of them are even my friends.

I doubt any of 'em would dare to breath the same air than you do for more than 2 seconds, naziboy.

>>136976432
Jew were brought up in the third post fuckhead.

>>136978604
If race isn't biological, then how can race be determined by the shape of ones skull? Check mate bean nigger

>>136976417
So you mean handedness does not exist?

You are taco nigger, you are automatically retarded. Get off this intellectual forum

More racism, the more a group survives.

Intelligence is evolutionary novel, and seldom survives.

In other words if your gonna be smart, be smart the right way, be a racist.

>>136978206
>Avram Noam Chomsky is an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist. Sometimes described as "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is Institute Professor Emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he has worked since 1955[...]

That's why its important to read phrases within their context.

I doubt Noam Chomsky would ever say "education sucks, drop out of highschool and set up an online vaping shop"

>>136972060
>>136978880
This post? Are you fucking stupid? Oh wait it's a Jew, I answered my own question

File: f705cdf412cca3935fe9bb3efc4ad80a.jpg (75KB, 902x697px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 902x697px

>>136979045
I beg to differ, Bean nigger

>>136979194
You can difer all you want, but criticizing education (because its not perfect) is very different than saying people who pursue higher levels of education are all as stupid as the average burger flipper.

File: smart-people-hide-racism-better.jpg (813KB, 787x924px) Image search: [Google]

813KB, 787x924px

>>136978562
>The findings from this study suggest that there is no simple answer
Go away brainlet, you're shitting up our redpill thread.

>Imported all these niggers, pakis, muslims to the UK
>Not one cockney exists in London
>Entire towns/villages being taken over
>Kids being raped while it's all being ignored
>Fucking low intelligence sub human scum look at my graphs and charts

>>136979403
>According to this perspective
Are you illiterate? The study doesn't PROVE that perspective, nor does that perspective state that smarter people are more racist.

Just admit that you were wrong and save some face. I'm getting second hand embarrassment here. It's clear that you didn't read the study before posting it.

>>136979398
Higher education on Marxism and feminism makes you more retarded.

Chomsky is a fucking white male. Why don't we listen to an African scholar instead on the recursive enumerable grammar

File: eternallybtfo.png (285KB, 673x672px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 673x672px

>>136978880
Racism was the point of the post, anti-semitism as the example. I'm sorry if that offended you, as jew or something, and made you lose all perspective and miss the context of the post.

>>136979589
>The study doesn't PROVE that perspective
Neither did your study ALONE "prove" your perspective. I thought it was obvious we were trading individual studies, none of whice ever "prove" such broad claims as "leftists/rightists/racists/anti-racists are smarter than X". If you believe individual studies do this, you're HuffPo tier "sciency nerdy", not actually literate in the sciences.

Shall we share more peer review?

(2006) Templer & Arikawa analyze populations by temperature, skin color, per capita income, and IQ and find stark correlations between all of them.

They were able to accurately predict individual IQ by skin color (0,92), mean high Winter temperature of their race (0,76), mean low Winter temperature of their race (0,66), and per capita income (0,63). These findings provide strong support for the idea that colder climates caused selection for higher IQs over an evolutionary epoch.

This helps to explain why groups from hotter climates like those found in Africa are less intelligent and thus earn lower incomes.

https://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/babies-prefer-individuals-who-harm-those-that-arent-like-them.html

File: F409EE26-F1FE-425E-B2B1-B2CE92CEF654-427-0000006EF9FFB8E4.jpg (101KB, 1024x617px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x617px

>>136969850
KYS faggot

You mean /pol/ eternally on top of your shit who's autism helped them save themselves from you mind breaking gender bending Jew inspired faggotry

>>SAGE

File: quote-students-who-acquire-large-debts-putting-themselves-through-school-are-unlikely-to-think-noam-chomsky-52-21-87.jpg (88KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 850x400px

>>136979398
I'm not the one saying it, Noam is

File: kalash_sarikoli.jpg (145KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 500x375px

https://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/babies-prefer-individuals-who-harm-those-that-arent-like-them.html

(2013) Karen Wynn shows that infants as young as nine months old prefer individuals who are nice to people of their race and dislike people mean to their race. In addition to this they also like people that are mean to others races and dislike people that are nice to other races.

>His centerpiece is a 2002 paper, published in Science by a group led by Stanford geneticist Marcus Feldman, which used a computer program called Structure to cluster populations of the world by their DNA similarities. When they asked the computer to cluster peoples of the world into two groups, the computer gave them EurAfrica and Asia-Oceania-America. When they asked the computer for three groups, the computer gave them Europe, Africa, and Asia-Oceania-America. When they asked the computer for four groups, it gave them Europe, Africa, Asia-Oceania, and America. When they asked it for five groups, it gave them essentially the continents. And when it asked the computer for six, it gave them the continents and the Kalash people of Pakistan. (They asked the computer for up to seventeen clusters, but only published the results up to six.)

>A study by Firasat et al. (2006) concluded that the Kalash lack typical Greek Haplogroups such as Haplogroup 21 (E-M35),
>Some of the Kalash people claim to be descendants of Alexander the Great's soldiers; and a recent genetic analysis has substantiated this belief.
>A study by Hellenthal et al. (2014) on the DNA of the Kalash people showed evidence of input from modern day Germany and Austria between 990 and 210 BC, a period that overlaps with that of Alexander the Great...
http://www.well.ox.ac.uk/~gav/admixture/2014-science-final/resources/FAQ.pdf
http://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(15)00137-8

File: E6786405-F251-4990-AA07-9926312C2F0D-3788-0000050901B54110.jpg (58KB, 540x655px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 540x655px

>>136979589
Pic related. Now stfu and gtfo you stupid faggot nigger loving kike

>>136980061
The study I linked explicitly states that "we found that lower general intelligence (g) in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology." and that "A secondary analysis of a U.S. data set confirmed a predictive effect of poor abstract-reasoning skills on antihomosexual prejudice, a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact."

Your study, which you claimed in your post >>136973397 to "have shown that more intelligent people tend to be MORE RACIST", didn't make that point at any point. You can't point out any passage in their study that states it. You made up the entire thing.

Admit it, you were wrong.

>>136980229
That seems more like a Bernie Sander's political position, which most left wingers would approve.

School should be free.

But thanks again for proving your lack of understanding.

>>136980312
Is this a post an intelligent person would make?

>>136980377
>my brainwashing should be free

Top Cuck

File: 6_no_significant_distance.png (94KB, 1047x625px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1047x625px

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/309/5741/1720

(2005) Mekel-Bobrov et al., conclude that the gene ASPM is a specific regulator of brain size, and its evolution in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens was driven by strong positive selection. They show that one genetic variant of ASPM in humans arose merely about 5.800 years ago in Eurasia and has since swept to high frequency across Eurasia under strong positivel selection.

The gene is almost non-existent in Sub-Saharan Africa.

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/tcga/tcgapdf/Thomas-99-intelligence.pdf

(1998) Thomas, Miller & Mascie-Taylor conclude that the EST00083 ("expressed sequence tag") is an mtDNA (mitochondrial; maternal) polymorphism found more often in high IQ groups. It is articularly common in Europe (less so in Asia) where it is associated with a lineage that dates back 35.000 years. It is nearly non-existent in Africa.

This finding goes along with a discovery by Turner & Partington in 1991 that shows mothers are the primary component in a child's intelligence.

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0019793890&origin=inward&txGid=0

(1981) Bouchard Jr. & McGue analyze 111 studies on familial resemblances in measured intelligence and reveal a profile of average correlations consistent with polygenic inheritance modes.

This means that these 111 studies (covering over 1.000.000 people) show evidence of polygenic inheritance modes.

Years after this study was performed polygenic inheritance of DNA was confirmed by genetic studies such as (Davies et al., 2011) and (Deary, Johnson & Houlihan, 2009)

>>136980332
>inb4 OP spends the whole thread pretending he didn't get BTFO almost immediately, 20 posts in
(you)

>>136980571
>nuh-uh it's you who got btfo!!
Out of arguments, brainlet?

File: maoa_genes.jpg (812KB, 1136x2200px) Image search: [Google]

812KB, 1136x2200px

http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/2-3/203.full

(2009) Way & Lieberman analyze genetic contribution to cultural differences in this piece and draw support for dual-inheritance theory.

They show that there are genetic predispositions for IQ, collectivism, individualism, a wide breadth of aspects of socialization, depression, and other psychocultural phenomena which determine the values of societies and their people. They show that populations have mean genetics which means they have mean dispositions and thus mean personalities as well and thus cultures are formed around those same means.

These findings are supported by (Simoons, F, 1969; Simoons, F, 1970; Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi & Piazza, 1994; Holden & Mace, 1997; Durham, 1991; Perry et al., 2007; Campbell, 1965; McElreath & Henrich, 2007; Kroeberm & Kluckhohn, 1952; Sasaki, 2013; Cochran & Harpending, 2009; Bentley, Hahn & Shennan, 2004; Boyd & Richerson, 1985; Gabora, 1995; and so many more)

The individual, the personal experience will triumph any study. Luckily most peoples experience with niggers, paki's, muslims or kikes is negative because they have affected their life negativity.

File: leftypol_research.jpg (3MB, 1122x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1122x4320px

========================================
ON THE HEALTH RISKS OF MISCEGENATION:
========================================
http://pastebin.com/tGMEhbhf
http://msu.edu/~renn/RHE-_mixed_race.pdf
http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html
http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.ca/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html
http://nature.com/scitable/topicpage/haldane-s-rule-the-heterogametic-sex-1144
https://scihub22266oqcxt.onion.link/10.1177/0886260509354510
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_022.pdf

https://www.gwern.net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
>Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations
http://docdro.id/avPyEsh
https://youtu.be/Nxv2x0DJonk

>>136980571
OP has already proven than whenever you link an article its full of descriptions that directly contradict your point of view.

Of course we can't expect it to do it to each and everyone of your links because that's a waste of time, which seems to be your strategy here.

Nice try tho, but we already know all of tricks Adolf.

>People that are racists are stoopid therefore we need to import lots of low IQ foreigners cause this is what the smart people want
This is literally nothing but an ad hominem fallacy.

Fact is that third africans, arabs and mestizos in your society increase crime, are a net loss to welfare states, contribute to hunkering down of social capital and also add to the low IQ population (which is then even more racist according to OPs studies)

>>136980925
Hmm 1 bait article vs the dozens the other anon has posted. How red is your ass after the spanking you've received this entire thread?

>>136981107
Its quality vs quantity my dear friend.

The fact that a single man from Norway has been able to fight against legions of /pol/ right wingers pretty much proves the superiority of the leftist mind.

File: black_crime_rates.gif (1MB, 616x5370px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 616x5370px

Daily reminder: society is a BIOLOGICAL construct.

>>136969850
(((settled science)))

>>136981480
Actually:

>Teens Raised by Lesbian Parents Tend to Be Smarter, Happier: Study

>http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00918369.2012.720499

strike #45214

>>136969850
>Following an ideology that supports traditionalism and family values contains more people who dislike faggots. Also, people who don't have lots of contact with faggots tend not to like them.
Who paid for this shit.

File: 1458215902573.png (1MB, 1631x934px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1631x934px

>>136981781
>Teens Raised by Lesbian Parents Tend to Be On Hormone Blockers, Castrated
FTFY

" a new study complicates the narrative that only unintelligent people are prejudiced. The paper, published recently in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, suggests smart people are actually more at risk of stereotyping others." https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/535158/

>>136981328
Every article he posted has been quality, and the Nordcuck has been getting destroyed the entire time

>>136969850
>All analyses controlled for education and socioeconomic status.
This means that the data was tinkered with.

>>136981936
>Individuals who had a greater capacity for abstract reasoning experienced more contact with out-groups, and more contact predicted less prejudice.
Really makes you think

>>136981924
And you point is?

Not only is anecdotal evidence stupid and pointless, the girl in your picture looks quite happy directly contradicting your assumptions regarding kids from homoparental relationships.

>>136982031
>the more you're around niggers the less prejudice you become
>this is what the libcuck actually thinks

Lmao

>>136981826
Thank you.

>>136982224
That's from the article you personally linked, moron

>>136982223
Libcuck Marxist, OK with brainwashing by fag parents and universities. Absolutely irredeemable

>>136982299
I didn't even link it, retard. Just pointing out your stupid logic

>>136982299
Sorry, it wasn't you. You both had blue IDs. The point is still from the article that was linked, not from me.

File: pedos_more_gay_16x.png (887KB, 768x1293px) Image search: [Google]

887KB, 768x1293px

>>136982031
>Individuals who who spent more time in oikophobic indoctrination spent more time virtue signalling by going to "ethnic restaurants" or hiring "migrant staff"
FTFY, read:
www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/cs49-8.pdf
Listen:
https://youtu.be/aR4MvD9IEAE

>>136982223
>And you point is?
Homosexuals are disproportionately responsible for child abuse, pic related.

>>136981924
When are child soldiers legal again?

>>136982224
I have found the opposite true in reality..

File: my_two_dads.jpg (84KB, 960x468px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 960x468px

>>136982563
>When are child soldiers legal again?
When we win by using them.

>>136982541
Pasting thousands of links from a bunch of pastebins isn't a replacement for a real argument. Try having a grown-up conversation every once in a while

>>136969850
>21 posts by this ID

File: 1495126161805.jpg (17KB, 512x527px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 512x527px

>>136982727
>LALALALALALA I DONT HEAR YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

>>136982660
It's because people are inherently tribal and like to be around their own kind

File: ChildMolestationByRace.jpg (50KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 600x400px

>>136982727
>Pasting thousands of links
Peer review articles supporting my view, and debunking yours.
>from a bunch of pastebins
From a bunch of science journals.
>isn't a replacement for a real argument
I tried arguing with you, but I wound up taking screencaps of highlighted sentences you were either pretending not to notice or too stupid to read.
>Try having a grown-up conversation
...on a Mongolian wedding cake recipe forum? As mature as wedding cakes will allow, I'm sure.

>>136982817
Just wait until you see how many posts the nazi flag guy has made during his meltdown.

>>136982861
I clicked one of the links and it was about flour beetle reproduction. I'm 100% convinced that this retard hasn't even read these links himself, just like he didn't read that one study he linked before going into an autistic rage.

File: 1496676518003.jpg (42KB, 419x393px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 419x393px

>>136983115
>I'm 100% convinced that this retard hasn't even read these links himself,
>I clicked one of the links and it was about flour beetle reproduction.

Never change /pol/

>>136972060
>the US is the entire world.
You're embarrassing yourself

>>136983115
>LALALALALA AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH CANT HEAR YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

So that's why black people are so racist!

>>136983835
>durr hurr democrats are the real racists

>>136983041
>I tried arguing with you, but I wound up taking screencaps of highlighted sentences you were either pretending not to notice or too stupid to read.
I read the sentence and it said that there was a perspective according to which smarter people would lie about their racism. It didn't say that "this study proves this perspective right" or that "smarter people are more racist", latter being your claim. Instead the study explicitly states that it provides no answer to the question you claimed it answered. Then you had a fucking meltdown and started spamming shit in hope of what, hiding your fuckup? I don't know what you think you're achieving here beyond embarrassing yourself further.

>>136969850
I don't really consider it "racism" if your grievances are legitimate. I have no issue with like 90% of black people I encounter personally, I've even found a lot of them to be genuinely funny. But the black community as a whole and their shitty culture pisses me off, as it should any honest white person.

>IQ tests are valid science when it proves racism
>IQ tests are not science when it proves racial differences
It's almost like every leftist is a hypocrite amirite?

>>136985543
Done already? There's a long way to bump limit. Remember to end your tantrum with an apology about being a petty person who can't handle being wrong.

File: bugchaser_forums.png (706KB, 1603x783px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 1603x783px

>>136985878
Why do so many fags possess such Thanatos?
https://youtu.be/oN4w8e432_o

>>136976526
It literally says that the smart and dumb have similar levels of "racism". The only difference is the smart can talk their way out of a label

>>136986130
He either doesn't care or can't understand, wasted effort.

>>136974115
What are crime statistics nigger.

>>136986130
Even if it did say that, this retard claimed that it said that more intelligent people tend to be more racist. It's hilarious how far he is willing to go to avoid admitting this.

>>136976417
>Race doesn't exist from a biological standpoint
Which is why you can't do a DNA test to find out your racial heritage. Science knowledge level: SJW nigger.

>>136986400
>Commercial DNA tests that claim to tell people whether they are related to Richard III or descended from the Vikings are no more than "genetic astrology", scientists have warned.

>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9912822/DNA-ancestry-tests-branded-meaningless.html

What's your MBTI type and horoscope, dear /pol/ack?

File: file.png (267KB, 661x879px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 661x879px

>>136986350
>his retard claimed that it said that more intelligent people tend to be more racist
The study did find evidence for that, and you were presented with more than one source to that effect. All you had to do was read, but you cherrypicked one chunk of a sentence where the author said "its not very clear", and ignored the conclusions -- just like you ignored all the sources provided to you ITT that contradicted your "feels". At this point I'm pretty sure you're a right winger baiting redpill posts, so I'm participating accordingly.

>>136969850
>Norway
Your women are easy if you treat them the way they ought to.

>>136976417
>If you classified people who are left handers as a different race, they'd suffer from discrimination as right handers are the dominant group.
Yeah, and there would be differences between zones of discrimination and equal treatment zones. Whereas gender and race have statistical differences that still exist in multiple settings. Go back to huffing paint fucking retard.

File: myancestorsbirb.jpg (41KB, 746x600px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 746x600px

>>136969850
>be smart
>be able to predict consequences of your actions better
>realize that you'll be crucified alive if you claim niggers are less smart than whites
>so you never take that position

>be dumb
>have a low wage job
>don't give a fuck
>can believe in what is true without fearing consequences
I don't have the pic here, but there's some screencaps of some guy discussing race differences with Chomsky, with Chomsky not even being able to make an argument or advance the discussion. I also notice how "anti-racists" only try to defend their position through proxies. It's always: "look at this vague data showing dumb people are racists meaning racism is dumb" or "look at this bad-ass quote from a progressive talking about how white and black men are equal". They never actually expose themselves to critical thought.

>>136987149
>All you had to do was read, but you cherrypicked one chunk of a sentence where the author said "its not very clear", and ignored the conclusions
The "it's not very clear" WAS the conclusion. The sentence you've highlighted here doesn't STILL prove your point about smarter people being more racist. It's like you keep posting garbage and hoping that nobody actually reads any of it, instead nodding their head in agreement because they agree with your entirely invented conclusions.

>just like you ignored all the sources provided to you ITT that contradicted your "feels".
Why would I acknowledge any of your sources (including an article about flour beetle reproduction) after you continue to deny that you were clearly wrong about the very first one you post? Nobody should take you seriously after that. It's clear that you're mentally unable to have a constructive discussion about anything.

I'm sure that you could have made a reasonable argument based on that study if you had actually read it. It makes an interesting, well-studied point about how enlightenment theory doesn't fit all the data. But you chose to make up a retarded conclusion and hope that nobody read your link, and instead of revising your argument after it being proven plainly wrong you just stuck with it. I don't know if you're doing this out of stupidity or something else entirely, but you have come across as a colossal fucking retard.

>>136978562
>but I sincerely doubt that some random blogposter found something that got past a respected journal's peer review.
bwahahaha, found your false god

>>136978955
>Check mate bean nigger
He's actually playing 1D checkers, /pol BTFO

>>136988780
>muh political bloggers are superior to people who actually peer review their studies to minimize errors

the absolute state of /pol/

>>136979925
>Chomsky is a fucking white male.
No he is not, fucking anti semite.

>>136980229
>I'm not the one saying it, Noam is
He says so much good shit, I wouldn't even gas him.

>>136980419
>Is this a post an intelligent person would make?
Yes, once determining the level of discourse available, and the amount of respect due. Fucking self-righteous midwit.

File: dnawatson.jpg (103KB, 575x387px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 575x387px

>>136975532
>yfw they had to silence the guy who invented DNA!

>>136986980
It's genetic astrology to determine wich ancestor you have, but not for your genome heritage.

>>136969850

Let me get this straight...

We can account for socioeconomic factors by ignoring them, IF you ignore them then it's is not a factor in the result?! Fucking genius.

The question samples were fucking shit. "would you mind if someone from a different race moved on to your street?" is not a deep question which reveals any insight what so ever.

Ignoring economic factors, and the types of people from different races which come with those factors, everyone is the same right?! How could you have any bias?! Dr Patel, your friendly and well paid neighbourhood GP, and Amjad Choudahury, the Islamic hate preacher who lives on benefits, are the fucking same right?! I mean, if were all the same and all cultures are equal how could anyone dislike foreign cultures!?

The study is terrible. It is actually less relevant than the previous studies in that it has less detail and doesn't even acknowledge differences in culture between races. It doesn't correlate anything with anything.

>>136978197
you seem vaguely intelligent. Why don't you provide some insightful content and tell us what it's like to be 100iq amongst your fellow 90iq Mexican intellectuals. . .

>>136969850

Yo, I'm gonna stick with my scientific racism. This poll is B.S. since they probably polled in some poor town in Scotland or some shit. You probably haven't had black people in your life have you? It takes firsthand experience to understand that sorta shit. And you probably don't have faggot friends either.

>>136977954
Decent criticism of the study

>>136989929
>>136990812
Criticism by people who have not read a single scientific article in their lives, including this one

File: KrhQLFL.png (177KB, 664x520px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 664x520px

>>136981781
>self reported data
>from teenagers
>"study"
The problem with these "studies" is that they are autistic and focus on tiny flawed data points and can never make broad correlations and look at someone's life as a whole. They don't realize how redundant it is to ask someone whether they are happy or not when they are teenagers.

What's more likely is that women are emotional bullies and someone raised by women alone is more likely to claim higher happiness and smile more, you can't say you are sad around a woman without having her emotionally get on top of you.

If they are fatter than the average, and if they are gayer than the average, that means in the long term they'll be a lot less happy. This is just a fact.

>>136985118
gorging on redpills here. thanks based natsoc...

File: florida.jpg (2MB, 1576x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1576x2000px

>>136986350
having trouble hearing you over my successful business and my big-ass house on a Florida island! Let me see if I can get my maintenance guy to turn the jet skis off for a minute...hold on!

>>136986130
>It literally says that the smart and dumb have similar levels of "racism". The only difference is the smart can talk their way out of a label
The smart can also maintain plausible deniability, and use nuance with language to express themselves in ways that less intelligent folks can't fully understand.

>>136982727
FWIW, you are getting fucking wrecked in this thread, so there's that.

My question is: why deny reality? Do you REALLY BELIEVE that people who experience diversity love it most? Please see the American PNW vs. the American South.

To know minorities is to hate them. I don't need a study--I can just walk around while in the South and see it first-hand.

Why do you hate humans so much?

>>136988063
>with Chomsky not even being able to make an argument or advance the discussion.
That smart linguist mofo, he could possibly hold lots of view that would tumble him from the throne of respected academic; nobody would probably ever know.

>>136982727
>Try having a grown-up conversation every once in a while
Then try to advance your level beyond childish rergurgitation of standard issue goverment programming loyalty signalling strings whilst being angry that yer conformity pings are not properly returned. Fracking dunning-kruger midwits.

>>136992108
>The problem with these "studies"

The problem with most /pol/acks is that they focus their attention on "degenerates", while the suicide rates among the white people are increading tenfold.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36116166

Oh but look at that guy having anal sex with another guy!

Does that make you happier? of course not, that's why you're here.

Nothing wrong with rampant capitalism tho!

File: antifa2.jpg (103KB, 544x720px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 544x720px

>>136993947
>The problem with most /pol/acks
You realize that by posting here, you're a "/pol/acks", right leftyfriend?
>Nothing wrong with rampant capitalism tho!
Maybe you should lurk moar, until you realize you have the same ideals as the ruling class.

https://youtu.be/e-BZylziBKI

File: 1502446399416.jpg (87KB, 720x541px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 720x541px

>>136969850
alright goyim, according to this study you have to accept homos or you're the one with a mental deficiency.

>>136993947
>suicide rates among the white people are increading tenfold

that's because we have to live around your people. let that sink in.

File: typical_shitlib_on_pol.png (228KB, 816x1372px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 816x1372px

>this whole thread

>>136994391
ANSWER ME FAGGOT! Whites make everything better wherever they go. Mexicans make everything worse wherever they go. Answer for yourself. Defend your existence, Mexitrash.

>>136969850
Racists having a lower intelligence is a post-war meme.

"Racist" ideologies like fascism and national socialism were originally deeply intellectual.

File: 1386938992187.png (771KB, 1546x1118px) Image search: [Google]

771KB, 1546x1118px

>>136994854
>Racists having a lower intelligence is a post-war meme
Especially since Israel is one of the most racist countries on the planet. Leftshits might have to pick between being anti-semitic and admitting Jews have low IQs, or admitting that high IQ people tend to be racist.

>>136994801
You're awfully proud of posting offtopic shit until people get sick of you and leave. Is that how you typically discuss things online?

>>136995199
>offtopic shit
I don't think I've posted anything ITT that's off topic. Why do you sound so upset?

>>136995297
I'd love to hear how you see http://nature.com/scitable/topicpage/haldane-s-rule-the-heterogametic-sex-1144 relating to the topic of IQ correlating political beliefs.

On the other hand, my therapist tells me that spending too much time talking to retards online is bad for my mental health, so maybe I'll just drop it here.

>>136994341
That's why I used the word "most", my rightard friend.

Thanks for proving my point again.

>>136996269
>Well, then you article was tl;dr and I won't bother.
Lmao it was an article that you linked earlier in this thread, so much for actually reading any of that shit, you fucking idiot

Nordbro was right the whole time

>>136995968
>my therapist
Are you schizo?
>tells me that spending too much time talking to retards online
Clever rhetorical flourish while retard posting, anon.
>is bad for my mental health
Maybe your mental health was poor BEFORE you met the therapist as well, just a thought.
>so maybe I'll just drop it here
Well, then you article was tl;dr and I won't bother. Don't fucking talk to me if you don't want an actual conversation you little bitch.

>>136996401
We don't need you

You need us

WHAT'S THAT LIKE!!? For once, would love to know what it's like to NEED to follow white people around!!? Me? I'm the captain of my own destiny--you: need white people. How do you factor that into your life and remain proud in any way/shape/form?

File: 1418888213896.png (87KB, 198x201px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 198x201px

>>136996401
Why do you share all the same ideals as the capitalist ruling class?

>>136996406
>Lmao
ho-ho-ho!
>it was an article that you linked earlier in this thread
What was, I didn't read your post.
>so much for actually reading any of that shit
That's what tl;dr means.
>you fucking idiot
Are any of you ever capable of posting without such childish pablum or screeching adhoms? I thought you said you were leaving the thread, why are you still posting?
>Nordbro was right the whole time
Were you "right the whole time", proxybro?

File: 1501393242666.gif (513KB, 525x539px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 525x539px

>*waiting for finbro to switch proxies and come back as nordbro*

>>136996890
>What was, I didn't read your post.
I'm dying here

Consider reading the shit you link here if you want to be taken seriously by anyone with half a brain

>>136996724
>For once, would love to know what it's like to NEED to follow white people around!!? Me? I'm the captain of my own destiny--you: need white people. How do you factor that into your life and remain proud in any way/shape/form?

If you don't need white people then why are you so worried about "muh white genocide"

Funny how MOST /pol/acks fashion themselves as individualists yet at the same time behave like collectivists.

>>136997175
>Consider reading the shit you link
Umm, YOU linked something...schizo...and I said tl;dr meaning I didn't read what you posted.

File: 1502410644576.jpg (60KB, 720x509px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 720x509px

>>136975734
Facts are racist, and being a beaner he probably cant read English
>you proved your point, so im assuming he'll just deny it, and act like you didnt.

Thats what the left does

File: mexico.jpg (70KB, 584x333px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 584x333px

>>136997201
I'm White. I get to live among my own people. What's YOUR excuse, MexiTRASH?

>/pol/ is one person
go get your head chainsawed off pls kthxbye

File: 1429094354841.jpg (61KB, 600x676px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x676px

>>136997302
Don't you have any more hot redpills you haven't read to drop?

>>136997201
Also, pls answer the question--does it hurt that your political activity centers around following white people so that you can improve your lot in life, you useless faggot?

File: 1502072647783.jpg (82KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 700x700px

>>136976417
Watching sjw beaners get roasted is fun
>You should come back every day to be proven wrong and look like a fool, all it does it prove to anyone on the fence liberal policies and ideals are WRONG.

It was fun Pablo, but maybe stick to what you know best
>Begging your american illegal relatives for more western union welfare

File: kek.gif (204KB, 404x416px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 404x416px

>>136997598
Why are you so upset and posting on a proxy Nordbro? I don't believe a Fingol with 2 post prior to noticing me is as upset with me as Nordbro was, while Nordbro has mysteriously disappeared. Why are you proxyfagging your own thread, faggot?

File: ernst zundel.gif (1MB, 970x546px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 970x546px

>inb4 nordbro "suddenly" returns

>>136997849
I'm not surprised people around you "mysteriously disappear"

File: 1501202079140.jpg (51KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 850x400px

>>136977181
I always ask liberals who say race difference isnt real, how do forensic police know a body is black, asian, or white? How do they know, because there are differences in the races.
>we've all seen the cold case file shows where only a Skelton is found, and they figure out the race and sex. If we were all the same that'd be impossible

File: wtf.jpg (29KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x300px

>>136997201
stupid mexifag acting like we give a shit

>>136998027
Its been hours and you're still begging for nordbro's return after he already did his job by making you salty and proving you incorrect.

File: 1485677791275.jpg (74KB, 293x298px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 293x298px

>>136998087
Oh sweetie, is that supposed to hurt my feelings?

>>136998249
>Its been hours and you're still begging for nordbro's return
I only mentioned it twice in the lat 10 minutes.

>>136998145
>stupid mexifag acting like we give a shit

I wouldn't count all those "this coalburner is dating a guddemn nigger" generals as not giving a shit.

Which is funny because no-one is forcing you to date black women or hell, even have sex at all. Which seems to be the main motivation behind most /pol/acks.

Sexual frustration.

>>136998087
Not sure if insult or open threat.

>>136978604
Beaner doctors
>Implying some 4chan beaner fuck like you knows anyone besides pot dealers and whores...kek

File: IMG_0436.jpg (119KB, 654x1024px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 654x1024px

>>136998409
More like race preservation, but of course, as we'be found out, that too is pointless.

File: adadawfa.png (98KB, 1050x1082px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1050x1082px

>>136998409
Do "we", the hivemind of /pol/, also take credit for this thread, and for you contribution to it? Is /pol/ a leftist SJW board now?

>>136998549
>More like race preservation

Which again, proves my point that you "need white people" more than the average white male or female needs you.

Ergo, /pol/acks are collectivists.

>>136978604
This is conjecture. We have no way of knowing if you are telling the truth because you can't prove it on the internet. Nothing against the arguement you are making, it's just that you can't say "oh, I do know people like x" because you can't prove it, therefore the rebuttal you gave is completely invalid.

File: file.png (153KB, 914x556px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 914x556px

>>136998628
>stop spamming my notifications
no one tagged you in any of those, so the only way its notifying you is if you have your 4chanx set to "follow thread". you're terrible at this game, proxyfag.

...oh , and I bet you just realized that, maybe that's why you deleted your post...

File: laughing.gif (1MB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x225px

>>136998506

>>136998670
>we
As if you honestly think /pol/ agrees with itself on everything you think it's stand for because someone told you.
Lurk more before posting, you absolute moron.

File: Cyc7lDoXgAAwdGB.jpg large.jpg (42KB, 478x469px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 478x469px

>>136998741
>you can't prove shit on the internet

Th-Thanks professor

File: are you trying to enrich me again.jpg (54KB, 526x572px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 526x572px

>>136969850
Isn't there a study out there conducted on college students that recorded their reactions to pictures of interracial couples and normal couples and it concluded that even the self-professed "liberal, tolerant" ones had disgust reactions to the pics of interracial couples?

It seems to me that tribalism is pretty innate and the only difference between smart people and dumb people when it comes to this is that smart people are conscious enough to hide those feelings of disgust.

>>136969850
WTF, I LOVE NIGGERS AND HOMOS NOW!

File: google_SJW.png (468KB, 991x938px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 991x938px

>>136998670
>if I pathologize my enemies views I win
Not really, no.

>>136999450
So now calling you stupid is trying to pathologize you?

As far as I can tell 5 years ago most right wingers outside the internet insisted homosexuality was a disease and in /pol/ pretty much most of you are still convinced that's the case.

File: im a special snowflake hear me roar.jpg (229KB, 729x1024px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 729x1024px

>>136999733
> implying it isn't

oh paco you have much to learn

>>136999107
You can't prove anything about your real life without proof, yes. Do I need to reiterate my point?

File: learn_beaners.jpg (914KB, 2756x904px) Image search: [Google]

914KB, 2756x904px

>>136999733
>So now implying your positions are all to rationalize your personal insecurities is pathologizing?
Yes. It's like when I imply that your sexual market value is low, or you have a low IQ and family that expected more of you than your were capable of, so you chose to internalize a set of narratives from critical theory, pathologizing society and culpabilizing white christian males as a kind of universalized scapegoat for your own personal deficiencies. Or if I were to claim that your antipathy toward capitalism is nonsensical or disingenuous, because it's actually motivated by your lack of personal wealth, or being a citizen of a country with low IQ, rampant organized crime, and extensive political corruption -- like most third-world-ism facilitates.

tl;dr

Your is the politics of envy, so we dismiss your views. Tell me, did it rustle you? Tell me, are you upset?

After we've seen this exchange a thousand times it gets really boring. No one cares that you call them names, no one cares what your non-professional psychoanalytical insights are, no one is moved by your worn out pseudo-intellectual Chomskian pablum. We've all heard is 6 gorillion times before.

>>137000670
The silence in a lack of answer is deafening.

Truly--the cucks were BTFO in this thread.

File: They+do+know+that+they+re+just+pissing+in+an+ocean+_b95ee843eda10662108f2b4c134fd5c5.jpg (7KB, 272x186px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 272x186px

>>137000973
I should have used this image.

>>137000235
>implying it isn't
Science has proven that it isn't and the next "logical" step for most /pol/acks is whine and accuse scientists of being controlled by (((them)))

Some lefties might oppose science, true. But no-one does it as well as right wingers.

File: 1404071748560.gif (763KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

763KB, 600x400px

>>136969850
Ethnocentrism is supreme

http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Recent agent-based computer simulations suggest that ethnocentrism, often thought to rely on complex social cognition and learning, may have arisen through biological evolution. From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates. Selfish and traitorous strategies are self-limiting because such agents do not cooperate with agents sharing the same genes. Traitorous strategies fare even worse than selfish ones because traitors are exploited by ethnocentrics across group boundaries in the same manner as humanitarians are, via unreciprocated cooperation.

>>137001519
>Some lefties might oppose science, true. But no-one does it as well as right wingers
I disagree. Do you have evidence to back this up?

>>136969850
This is true in my experience. Another anecdote of mine however, is that high IQ people are idealistic and often get overwhelmed or simply fail where more pragmatism is required. Varsity students come to mind.

Besides that, the supporters of an idea don't necessarily determine its accuracy.