Is it possible to channel all of /Pol/ into a /pol/-ism?
What would be the basic /pol/-line seeing to a majority of opinions within certain fields? (For example economy, global policy, progressive/conservative etc. etc.)
Brutalist af
>>136933117
/pol/ believes in personal freedom above all.
this is why the jidf, fbi, cia, nsa, and trump's dogs are always here.
it's why jewgle is always here.
it's why soros pays to have (((them))) here.
>>136933117
>>136933220
I fully agree.
If you ever see Islam lover, white sharia autism, or something giving government more power then you know it's Soros' plant.
Trump dick riders and fascists are people who fell for it.
>>136933117
>Economics
Gas the kikes go back to a value based currency system.
>Global policy
Every man has it's place a home for every race.
>progressive/conservative
Seig heil 1488 Hitler was right
>>136933220
Fuck your personal freedoms if they are a cancer to society. If I was fuhrer. All these whiny SJW feminist faggots would be sent to labor camps actually do something propoductive with their lives.
>>136933220
Yeah, I guess that sums it up pretty good. 4chan sort of, is pure freedom of speech, without any form of restrictions. But will extreme freedom of speech build anything in the long run? (as in reach a form of conclusion and ''a way'') Talk is cheap after all. Theory upon theory will be a kind of academic circlejerk.