Obviously gay marriage is bad, but what specific points should one bring up in opposition to it being made legal?
A vote is happening soon in Australia.
So far:
>marriage in etymology and in history is a bond between a man and a woman
>it can produce nothing
>nothing stopping gays from having their own separate institution (if they really want to)
>slippery slope
What do you think?
Look at the rest of the countries before and after it was legalized. Do the Aussies really want to go down that path?
It's a build up to legalizing pedophilia
Why should the state be involved in marriage at all?
>>136881023
sign me up!
>>136880792
You don't have to give reasons and argument points when you vote cunt, just go fucking vote against it.
>>136880792
It transforms marriage from being the foundation of a family to being a tax break. It's also giving gays special privileges that incestuous/pedophiles aren't able to indulge in and only paving the way for such arrangements to become a possibility.