>Goes on Wikipedia >'Russian interference in the 2016

>T. wikipedia intellectual.
sage

>>136865608
that's just the quote comey gave before the committee.
There's still no evidence that they did anything to the election other than the possibility that they would have wanted Trump instead of Clinton

Yes, but for anyone with the slightest knowledge of geopolitics and psyops it's quite apparent that the "Deep State" concept is a destabilizing mechanic being exerted on the US. The Russians are making it so that the American people can't even trust their own media, their own intelligence services, their politicians, et c.

Even someone as mainstream as Yuri talked a lot about it.
There are currently several "wars on your mind", and Russia has been winning since the 60's - starting with HIV rumours, moon landing conspiracies, flouride mind control, and so forth. In the modern era they've successfully manage to make it so that the vast majority of anti-establishment/anti-mainstream ideas are in harmony with Russian foreign policy. It's highly apparent on /pol/, for example.

>>136866109
>no evidence
>341 sources
Are you sure?

341 sources ending beginning with cnn.com

File: cucksgotcuckedagain.jpg (43KB, 1000x572px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1000x572px

>>136865608
What happened on the site where anyone can write anything? Is this a real question?

t. kid who cites Wikipedia in his high school assignments.

You're aware of how legitimately retarded this board is right? There's more people here who believe pizzagate is real than there are people who believe that Russia meddled with the election.

File: lib-media.jpg (94KB, 899x400px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 899x400px

>>136865608
>Sources
>Washington Post
>Huffington Post
>NYTimes
>Buzzfeed

Really makes you drink

>Go to sources
>All of them said "Yep it totally happened just dont look into it, boy am i sleepy!"

>>136866203
>muh russssshaaa
>believinv CNNs fake news
>being this much of a cretin


Kys svencuck

Srill butfpained about Poltava i bet

>>136865608
The same intelligence agencies that said there were WMDs in Iraq.
The same intelligence agencies that destabilize foreign countries around the world.
You may not be american but you sure are as dumb as one.

File: prison_mike.jpg (38KB, 500x540px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x540px

>>136866487
Kiddie rape denier. You disgust me.

>>136866700
not an argument

>>136866928
Nice appeal to emotion, I bet you have to use that a lot when you have 0 (zero) evidence to support that it's real.

>>136866487
There is more circumstancial evidence towards Pizzagate than there is about Russian meddling in the election.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

>>136865989
>>>/global/rules/7

>>136866204
Read any of the sources and they're just reporters quoting the same fucking shit.

NO EVIDENCE EXISTS.
IF IT DID, WE WOULD HAVE SEEN IT MONTHS AGO.

>>136865608
Remember when they called it hacking?

How is it any different then what share blue/crt did and does on normal message boards in disqus or even anon boards? The only solid connection that would validate OP's quote would be RT, no?

>>136866203
Russia has done lot to influence us, yes, but this was in the late 50's to the 80's. They pushed their brainwashed guys into education, media and politics.(i.e. sanders/ warren types)

I doubt they really a even fraction of what they once were in terms of that kind of subversive influence.

The media did what they did to themselves. No point in history can you see the media becoming that bias. Wikileaks has yet to be disproved as well, so the evidence of collusion between a single party and the free* worlds most powerful institution still valid and standing.

>>136867424
Does a basement that never existed in a restaurant count as evidence?

File: C6UlETOWMAAlBxK.jpg large.jpg (135KB, 1185x720px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1185x720px

>>136865608
trying to repeat something so much that it becomes "the truth"

>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/10/college-student-gets-100-days-in-slammer-for-registering-dead-voters-for-dems.html
http://archive.is/DIB52

>>136866203
The interesting thing is that the Russians use the same tactics on their own people - creating confusion, so that nobody knows what to believe, doing plainly and deliberately obvious psyops. I assume the Americans do the same. It's fascinating.

File: 1501250864179m.jpg (73KB, 781x1024px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 781x1024px

>>136865608

The only one that didn't swear up and down that there were WMDs in Iraq was the one who didn't exist yet. Those seventeen didn't even examine the server, their conclusion doesn't mean jack and is an insidious combination of argumentum ad popularum and appeal to authority.

Also wikipedia is owned, run, and controlled by leftists.

>>136866253
>>136866563
>>136867538
What sources would you accept? All of the left wing sources are too left to be trusted and all of the right wing sources obviously aren't going to go anti-Trump.

>>136868187
Raw data, government records etc
Getting real information is next to impossible though for high level government level conspiracies.

>>136868569
So you're saying that you could never know even if this was true?

>>136868187
Literally one primary source

one

singular

from anyone

> inb4 crowdstrike who literally retracted their statement because podesta didn't pay them enough

>>136868187
I'd like to read reports that claim Russians altered data pertaining to the electoral process.
Then I'll say they've interfered.

Remember when they all said Russia "hacked" the election? Then it came out without a reasonable doubt that Russia did not alter one single vote, so now they change it to Russian "interference" which is designed to be as subjective and vague as possible so there's no way to prove or disprove such claims.
It's shitty logic at best and disgusting spineless cry-baby behavior at worst.

>>136868711
What primary source? It's not like Trump is going to admit to it.

File: 1250789232341.gif (2MB, 286x215px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 286x215px

>>136866203
>muh rusha
Found our sub yet?

>>136867594
>I doubt they really a even fraction of what they once were in terms of that kind of subversive influence.

Considering that all kinds of things indicate that they have ramped up and evolved psychological operations massively, it would make sense that most people would think that. There was only a brief turn-down in Russian psychological activities during the "new era" of the 90's, before Putin assumed power.

Notable examples include the management of the 1999 apartment bombings, where Russia, as a state actor, created a false-flag as a motive for the 2nd Chechen War. That concept was later turned on the US as a destabilizing activity, to convince the American public of that their own government had killed thousands of civilians.

Then we have Russian interference in the political stability of Ukraine, while pointing the finger at EU/NATO, the de facto invasion of Crimea and the way it was covertly carried out. More recent examples include denial of Syrian gas attacks, as well as everything related to the US election - as well as Brexit. I'm sure you've read articles about the Russian & Chinese "troll armies".

Right-wing sentiments in Europe have been fueled, partly because of the immigration waves - out of which I believe the war in Syria to be a kind of literal "population warfare" against the EU in order to split the union - which it has succeeded to to in part. That's why the Syrian regime accepts the extreme amounts of collateral damage - the collateral is part of the point.

If you're interested in the topic, then I can highly recommend:

http://www.jhuapl.edu/ourwork/nsa/papers/ARIS_LittleGreenMen.pdf

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/7-KENNAN%20CABLE-ROJANSKY%20KOFMAN.pdf

https://krypt3ia.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/fm_9.pdf

http://cco.ndu.edu/Portals/96/Documents/Articles/russia's%20renewed%20Military%20Thinking.pdf

>>136867803
Yep. It's just population control.

>>136869006
Leftovers seem keen on leaks yet there are none

>>136866204
If they were actually sources we'd be all over it

>>136868187
>muh right wing news
No such thing. Even fox is sowing doubt in most of their segments.
They are no longer news, merely entertainment.

Why would you get your news from something that is created as entertainment?

>>136869839
>implying that you've read them

>>136869093
It went back to NS Concord or R/V Professor Logachev nearby. The second of which was also submarine-capable, and for some reason had turned off it's transponder... We ONLY got surface images, witness reports, radar data, and seabed prints - and a shitload of Kremlin-run news-sites telling everyone "IT WASN'T A SUB"

Do you have any questions related to this topic?

>>136866203
The American media does a fine job bleeding respectability without any interference

>>136868692
What i really dislike is how any side might present a as of yet unknown truth in some black and white clear as day truth.
If they just reported things and were honest about how they can't yet confidently make sny conclusions but present what evidence exists it would be best.

Much like the scientific method where no single study shows the truth, merely sheds light little by little then a review of the body of evidence might allow a theory to form until its shown to be otherwise.

File: sources random.png (594KB, 1211x794px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 1211x794px

>>136869928
here's a completely random screencap of the sources.
Any of these look like primary sources to you?
Or are they all just biased articles that are nothing but speculation?

>>136865608
I just don't get why Russia gave the Clinton foundation so much money if Trump was their guy.

http://archive.is/1nURe

>>136870031
Right.

>Americans' Trust in Mass Media Sinks to New Low

http://www.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx

Relevant article:
>Why Is Everyone Mad at the Mainstream Media?
http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s9607.pdf

>As a result, the trustworthiness of more professionalized
forms of journalism is under steady assault.

>Overall, those practicing conventional, objective journalism are in a much different position than they were a generation ago. They are dramatically less trusted by the public, face harsh and persistent political criticism, and must compete with less conventional news sources as well as many other entertainment options.

I wonder why it is that traditional mainstream media are portrayed as evil, why other alternative news outlets are praised for being bringers of truth?

The Guardian, Reuters, AFP, WaPo, NYT, are all presented as part of some conspiracy.

Ok. I'll bite. How, exactly did Russia effect the elections?

>>136870704
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

That's the skinny on it. More on that within a few months, as the Mueller investigation progresses.

>>136871032
>report includes an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among The Central Intelligence Agency(CIA), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and The National Security Agency (NSA)
so you completely ignore the existence of UMBRAGE? does "conflict of interest" not mean anything to you?

>>136865608
>trusting kikepedia

>>136865608

File: 102571013.jpg (6KB, 250x223px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x223px

>>136866204
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKrlfqWzE4c&t=74s
NO EVIDENCE
O

E
V
I
D
E
N
C
E

>>136867473
>>136871032
>We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.

FFS this is simply an assessment of capability. They don't even make accusations.

I'm capable of killing somebody that doesn't make me a murderer.

>>136866204
Yeah, 341 sources saying,"we think Russia would have preferred Trump to win over Clinton".

We have to watch all this stupid tension being created in the world because CIA or whatever "deep state" can't win the elections on their own turf anymore. This wasn't unexpected at all, the British knew a few years in advance that there's an overthrow being organized in USA, hence the Brexit.
(((They))) had enough time to plan a good election campaign, but instead (((they))) pandered to mentally ill, and now we have to watch all this stupid tension because autistic mandchildren can't admit defeat.

>>136866204

341 sources...of hearsay.

>>136867538
But Hilary's emails, though....

Lesson is, pandering to mentally ill works only when you control all the candidates and the plebs have no choice.

File: bezmenov.jpg (1MB, 2770x778px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2770x778px

>>136866203
could you get any more retarded

>>136865608
why and who created that ? it is complete bullshit .

>>136866487
shill

>>136872548
warning red pill
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy

>>136872599
But Hillary taking money from the Russians though.
>>136870547

File: glowinthedark.jpg (437KB, 822x1101px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 822x1101px

you trust this fucking cancer?
they got american soldiers to die for a worthless war just for Israel you think they didn't lie about the election?

>>136872884
What if we archive that https://archive.is/iOL9C

File: mindrapistnews.jpg (4MB, 3819x2570px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3819x2570px

>>136870498
Mindrape Media is now a 'source'
Wikipedia is just a mindrape nexus

File: 1497551433467.jpg (96KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 400x400px

>>136872884
>The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked
Love the headline, I'll read it when I wake up.

>>136868866
Sadly the whole goal was always just to have the word Russia trigger some weird negative reaction against trump by word association. And fuck me but when people say Russia in any context now I think Trump. And boy do I hate that because I'm a huge Trump supporter.

>>136871809
>UMBRAGE
There's no contradiction there. Technology appropriation is one of the key reasons why espionage is carried out. Forging "fingerprints" is also nothing new. That's used by any intelligence service with counter-intelligence capabilities. It's definitely used by China and Russia as well.

>does "conflict of interest" not mean anything to you?
I'm familiar with theories on "CIA/FBI did it".
Who else would you suggest carry out these kinds of investigations, if not the intelligence community? Every damn branch has been involved in this investigation, and I don't know if you've ever been involved in your Armed Forces but it's really not like they're all democrats.

>>136872417
>They don't even make accusations.

Yes, they do. See 'Key Judgements' on p ii:
>We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.

More on that in that entire section.

>I'm capable of killing somebody that doesn't make me a murderer.

Indeed. But that analogy doesn't apply here.
In this instance, a person with the intention and capability to murder someone - and attempts at this were documented in many ways - and later that someone died.

>>136872922
They also have been getting their asses handed to them by Chinese intelligence.

>>136873229
got an example? I'm curious

>>136873166
checked

>>136865608

First mistake you made was mentioning Wikipedia as the original source.

LIBERAL LOGIC FAIL

>>136873209
> And fuck me but when people say Russia in any context now I think Trump.
It just reminds me I made the right choice.

>>136869936
>no we didn't but it was there, I swear
ok

Also I hope we get the day to DESTROY Liberals once and for all. They are a cancer on the Earth with their mental disorders.

Trannies vs REAL MEN

>>136873209

Is Russia or the EU more harmful to the US?

>>136873393
>no we didn't but it was there
Yes. That's what all of the gathered evidence suggests.

It's not like operations like that doesn't take place, and it wouldn't be the first time you had submarines in our waters.

>>136873214
Listen dawg I know you got an agenda but we aren't buying the BS. They don't get to say "We did not make
an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016
election." and get to say "We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments." since that is an assessment of impact on the election. That is talking out one's ass.


>Indeed. But that analogy doesn't apply here.
In this instance, a person with the intention and capability to murder someone - and attempts at this were documented in many ways - and later that someone died.
The analogy is fine. Russia is capable, Russia has motive. No evidence of a hack produced but we are supposed to accept it as truth. Fuck that frame up.

>>136873481

>Trannies vs A REAL MAN

Real Man would still win. Trannies would just trip over each other and die of STDs

>>136874030
>I know you got an agenda

If you can't go past that unfounded assumption for the sake of discussion, then I can't help you.

>>136865608
>Wikipedia
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
*breathes*
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*breathes again*
OHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA
*one more time*
HOOOAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAHHAHAA
HOOHOOOHOOOOOHEEEHEEHEEE
HEH HEH

sage

>>136874715
I would love to get past assumption but we aren't being given evidence. Just the word of 3 agencies that have been spying on us and blowing smoke up our ass.

>>136871032

wtf I hate trump now

>>136874030

>dawg

kys now. don't wait. do it right now by any means possible.

File: NytFalseRussiaHacksAdmission.jpg (95KB, 668x507px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 668x507px

>>136866204
>341 sources
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or if you're really stupid enough to believe those 341 quote sources for that article are all pieces of evidence about Russian collusion.

Even the first line is bullshit. Only 4 of the 17 US agencies agreed with the assessment that Russia interfered. The rest told them they were full of shit.

>>136873209
Whenever people say pedophile I think podesta

>>136868187
>What sources would you accept?
When 13 of the 17 departments of the US Intelligence community REFUSE to sign off on the evidence-free claim that Russia interfered, that tells me pretty much everything I need to know.

>>136866204
341 sources that end up being conspiracies without actual evidence.

>>136875126
>The rest told them they were full of shit.
Source?

>>136866203

Anti-establishment is real, but your point is also true.

>>136872744
I am the person attempting to reason with demoralized and inoculated people. That is the retarded part.

Also, that's not what he was referring to. I take it you haven't read his books.

>>136879053
KGB tactics were leftwing politics forced onto everyone to destroy us

File: kookrel.jpg (936KB, 1200x1097px) Image search: [Google]

936KB, 1200x1097px

>>136879053

>>136870572
>I wonder why it is that traditional mainstream media are portrayed as evil, why other alternative news outlets are praised for being bringers of truth?
Because the mainstream media is utter shite. Anyone who's ever watched the News and compared it to articles online can see the difference pretty clearly.

Just because Russian intelligence has the ability to co-opt alternative narratives for their own purposes doesn't mean that that the mainstream media isn't incompetent. If anything, it proves it.

File: 1501464845194.gif (30KB, 162x192px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 162x192px

>>136865608
>There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

>Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.

>Forensicator’s first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.

>“A speed of 22.7 megabytes is simply unobtainable, especially if we are talking about a transoceanic data transfer,” Folden said. “Based on the data we now have, what we’ve been calling a hack is impossible.”

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

File: 1502350644673.jpg (244KB, 640x928px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 640x928px

>>136880142
>wikipedia

>>136880142
>https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
http://archive.is/Oo9aF

>>136880853
>people who advocate for white pride aren't racist

>>136866928
Man, fuck the kids. I know I do.

>>136881299
>not embracing racism for everyone as the completely normal thing it is
this is only because women can vote, the men are weakened in political power and easier to defeat with conventional propaganda techniques

>>136881299
Are you new?

>>136866203
Honestly don't see how people are disagreeing with it.

>>136881299
>Everyone who advocates white pride is racist.
>None of the other racial pride groups are racist.

>>136865608
People are leaving seoul

>>136866203
>>136869517
CIA and diaspora kikes have stronger motives and resources to influence Americans than Russia does

>>136867336
You clearly haven't seen the emails ever. Btw your genuine passion against this and your kekistan flag clearly out you as a shill.

Why is the phrase "mentally ill" constantly coming up in this thread?

Probably relevant:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/jul/06/17-intelligence-organizations-or-four-either-way-r/