Is Trump really gonna drop the nukes? I don't think that's

He's a retard

Who the fuck knows? You fags elected him, now you have to deal with the consequences.

>>136839301
>>136839310
I'm scared

>>136839238
Would it surprise anyone if Trump nuked North Korea? He's a walking time bomb who is triggered by everything. Such an awful leader and awful human being.

North Korea has no real power. As soon as they try something they will be blown off the map.

And no one will care about them.

At this point America could launch an attack and end things in less than 24 hours. Their rocket technology is 60 years behind, and they have never been in a war before.

>>136841319
>60 years behind
They're communists, try 200

>>136841180

Why shouldn't he bomb them?

They are literally begging for it.

>>136841594
Begging to be bombed into Jewish submission. Good American goy, support your president with ambitions to secure israels banking cartel globally.

>>136841319
>>136841594
South Korea will suffer too, even assuming everything goes 100% right

File: North Korea getting ready.jpg (29KB, 640x388px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x388px

North Korea getting ready for battle, kek.

File: 976859469549.jpg (20KB, 306x306px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 306x306px

>>136839238
Why is everyone such a pussy?
>ZOMG WERE ALL GONNA DIE
>LET'S BOOTLICK OTHER COUNTRIES ASSES LIKE A BUNCH OF KEKS!
Grow a spine.

>>136839238
no
there is no need to nuke a country when conventional bombs and warfare will get shit done

>>136841698

South Koreans laugh about North Korea.

Don't even have electricity at night, calls itself best Korea.

>>136839238
i know this may just sound fucked up but whats stopping the USA form assimilating South korea.
it will give the USA more territory, force them not to hurt anybody in the area as it would be a act of war and place weapons to counter both china and north korea

>>136841696
Nuclear winter puts a pretty serious dent in the Jew's profits

they can't sell home heating systems when everyone is dead

>>136842007
In 5-10 years it will not be enough. Korea would possess enough nuclear firepower to wipe out the U.S. so our only option would be to nuke them first.

We are entering a new age of "Korean MAD" and the rules will be quite different than Soviet MAD

Soviets wouldn't have been so brazen in threatening Guam

>>136839238

If NK nukes someone, yes.

That's how it goes.

>>136842007

We could roll in with civil war technology and still destroy them.

They can't even feed their soldiers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvy_Xi4t2P4

Leave North Korea to us.

>>136842205
fortunately we might not have to wait that long
if that fat little homo starts shit he will become a memory
also remember that economically crushing an enemy means they cant use their weapons
>see cold war
russia had enough anthrax in the eighties to kill the planet 10 times over and no way to deploy it

>>136842326
exactly
there are so many options that a nuke is just fearmongering

>>136839301
>>136839310

>you can't nuke someone if they nuke someone

Get the fuck off /pol/ homos

>>136839238
War with N.K will 100% go nuclear, U.S will probably be safe but Seoul and maybe some cities in Japan will be hit hard. Our missile interceptors aren't as good as we think, we'll be lucky to catch maybe one.

N.K won't be the first to strike though, they are just as concerned as surviving as any nation and they know a war means the end for them. The ball is in Trump's court, and should he choose war, the deaths of millions will be on his hands. What good will bringing down the N.K regime be if it comes at the cost of destroying S.K?

>>136842508

Fear mongering gets ratings.

Everyone in North Korea is a hostage suffering from starvation, they just don't know it yet.

File: muh donald.jpg (27KB, 545x396px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 545x396px

>>136839238
Hes not gonna use a nuclear weapon. That would be a poor example to the koreans and ANYONE else in the world that has them.

>"dont use nuclear korea. america knows best and if you dont listen we'll drop a nuclear bomb on you"

Can you fuckin imagine what russia, iran, india, and turkey would say? The whole world would once again think its okay to use nukes. It would be a shitstorm.
The best thing to do I think, would be to invade now and take control of the military bases with nuclear weapons before Kim has the chance to do something stupid. After a resounding threat, it would be in the interest of america to prevent the threat from coming to fruition. Nobody has to get bombed. But i guess the quickest way would be to just bomb their nuclear facilities. Fuckin, how hard of a decision is this? considering the circumstances of the world, i say preemptive is the best route. Korea is the aggressor here. they always have been.

>>136839238
It would be extremely painful.

>>136842916
yup
meanwhile others know this and live like it is another day
>bush era color code of threat
>were at orange
>no one knows what that means but lets all shit our pants
north koreans will be marched to their death by their edgelord leader
those that remain will have to learn what the world is really like once propaganda isnt supplied more abundantly than food

>>136842658

That is why we should be attacking them right now.

We never warned Japan about the nukes, but we gave NK a chance.

They will lose so bad it won't even be fair. We are watching their every move, they can't even get ready or they will turn to ash.

>>136839238
We are going to be turning the place over to SK so we don't want to leave a huge mess for them to cleanup. We are more than equipped to mop the floor with NK using conventional warfare. China is the real problem. They seem to be keeping quiet on the issue of NK. That concerns me.

>>136843345
...they litterally air dropped pamplets over those cities before they dropped the bomb

File: donkey kong demeanor.jpg (541KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 3000x3000px

>>136841943
Well forgive us but spines only achieve optimal growth in the absence of intense nuclear radiation.

NK is so bad at doing war they tell us their plans way before hand.

kek

Talk enough shit and we will respond, and it won't be anything less than total domination and destruction.

File: 1394677007584.jpg (24KB, 244x209px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 244x209px

>>136843671
>not wanting to live in a nuclear fallout

>>136843345
A surprise nuclear attack would look horribly on us though. Besides the massive civilian casualties, we'd also have to deal with the fallout, which could potentially cause harm to any nation that it spreads to. So we run the risk of killing civilians in China/Russia, or our own allies in S.K and Japan.

Plus, N.K would definitely be able to get their missiles out if they detected an incoming barrage, and then we would have even more blood on our hands.

I can not see any military option working with N.K, unless we get to the point where we can 100% counter ICBMs and render that delivery system obsolete.

>>136841319
>>136841402
Do you honestly believe NK is developing their own rockets, with how fast they've "progressed"
Someone is providing them the tech.

>>136839238
Trump doesn't need to drop the nukes.

>>136843982
>deal with the fallout

There's no fallout from airbursts, which the US would use on all but hardened shelters.

File: electric niggers.jpg (94KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 736x552px

>>136843828

>>136843662

This is false.

https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-the-US-dropped-flyers-as-a-warning-before-bombing-Hiroshima-and-Nagasaki

They, unlike the North Koreans, thought the atomic bomb was a myth.

>>136843982

We have the ability to stop their missiles. We have been working on that exact technology for over half a century.

It's just one of those things we don't want first attackers to know.

Russia probably has the same tech.

Just task one of our satellites and drop an orbital kinetic strike. Why bother with a nuke?

>>136844399
>We have the ability to stop their missiles
Do we really though?

https://www.wired.com/2017/05/interceptor-missile-defense-test/

Our interceptors have about a 50% success rate, and that's just targeting one missile, in a testing environment where everything is neatly lined out and everyone knows exactly what to expect.

So if we can barely get a 50% success rate against one missile, what are we to do when N.K fires off 10?

nukes are fake -dubay

>>136845012

No, no one has the ability to shoot down an actual war shot of an ICBM.

It's why people are chimping out about it all.

>>136841319
North Korea is Chinas buffer from the U.S influence in that area. If NK is ruined the only option is turning it into one big dmz.

South Korea takes it over afterwards and U.S builds bases we will be having problems

>>136845012

That is intentional misinformation.

The real speeds are classified, obviously.

In 1984 we had black project craft going 22.000mph, much faster than the fastest ICBM.

>>136839238
Same old crap When Reagan was elected, the leftys were all going apeshit about how he was going to start a nuclear war.

>>136839238
noboday cares here about your clown. you elected that bozo and you gave him the launch codes. now suffer.

>>136839238
Trump said fire and fury the likes of which the world has never seen. Well we've already seen nukes. He's gonna ayy lmao them off the face of the planet. The rest of the worlds response will be u wot?

>>136845504

lasers can blast that shit out of space. you think the military shows you everything it's got?

>>136839238
12 MOABs - It's more PC

File: SlayerheAwt.jpg (98KB, 298x298px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 298x298px

>>136842326
Tons of other bombs, non-nuclear polluting.
A few hundreds MOAB to munitions, staging areas, power plants, air base, fuel depos and done.
Even tactical Hydrogen-Bombs of Peace are non polluting.
Work with South Korea to bomb open the DMZ to allow normal combatants and defectors to get sanctuary. Set up grassrootst miliria to get out innocent people, prep for major non nuclear bombing.
Bombs of Peace. God bless you Trump.

File: nkgirls.jpg (87KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1280x720px

Hopefully, but realistically you wouldn't need any nuclear weapons to take down NK

>>136839238
>Is Trump really gonna drop the nukes?
Not likely. He doesn't need to and it'd destabilize and piss off our allies and trade partners in the region.

The country's gonna get fucked over following their current course of action.

File: Foldyet.jpg (31KB, 474x240px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 474x240px

>>136842326
Tons of other bombs, non-nuclear polluting.
A few hundreds MOAB to munitions, staging areas, power plants, air base, fuel depos and done.
Even tactical Hydrogen-Bombs of Peace are non polluting.
Work with South Korea to bomb open the DMZ to allow normal combatants and defectors to get sanctuary. Set up grassrootst miliria to get out innocent people, prep for major non nuclear bombing.
Bombs of Peace. God bless you Trump.>>136844399
..ftfy " stolen tech". Hopefully Trumpo is getting a Gestapo American version rright now vetting and scaring the shit out of would be traitors in the State department, all those fucking tranny faggots( yes real plain faggots are better than trannies and keep that shit to youself, thank you. Don't Ask, Don't tell was right)

>>136844187
Because you're any less dead from fire bombing, point is they were warned You stay in the cities you die

>>136839238
>North Korea tests missiles
>North Korea threatens to blow us up
>Trump says stfu Korea we will blow U up first
>REEEEEE DANGLE DRAUMPH WILL GET US ALL BLOWED UP

>>136847518

No one has actual lasers that can shoot down ICBMs in service.

>>136847518
Lasers that can do that are super heavy and create a lot of heat and heat takes a long time to dissipate in space

>>136849508
This.

Why is the left wing/american jews so fucking retarded? I don't see what's wrong with what Trump said: if you threaten America we will bomb the shit out of you.

>>136841594
Dropping a nuke on North Korea will cause radiation poisoning to other country's around it.

Im not worried about north korea, im more worried about china, russia, and iran having their back. You can bet if kimmy strikes it was ok'd by china.

>>136850233
This is why you dont use one big nuke, you use many smaller ones.

>>136850233
>millions less chinks, koreans and anime faggots

>a bad thing

In this overpopulated world, the less people the better

>>136839310
lmao
Everyone will deal with the consequences.

THE WEAK PUSSY MAN FOLDED! HE NOW SAYS "THEY WILL BE IN TROUBLE IF THEY 'DO' ANYTHING"

FUCKING SAGE ASSHOLE FOLDING LIKE A PROPER FUCKING PUSSY.

THIS FUCKER IS ALL TALK NO ACTION

>>136850233

Airbursts don't cause fallout of note, and it's what you use as the area destroyed is larger

Ground bursts are what cause fallout, and they're only used against hardened bunkers buried deep underground

>Trump nukes NK
>NK launches every one of his nukes to US, SK and Japan
>Despite many being taken down some manage to land
>They aren't using any kind of "tactical" nuke so radiation propagates everywhere
>Everything is NKs fault, including how US handled the war

Aren't north americans tired of paying an overpriced military industry owned by jews actively searching for enemies?

File: The time of the total explosion has come-.png (88KB, 1131x943px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1131x943px

>>136839238
>Is Trump really gonna drop the nukes?
BASED FAT KIM GOOK WILL. I CAN TELL YOU THAT

>>136839238
Sweetie he doesn't even have the nukular codes. Right? Seeetie?