How feasible would it be to hack NK nukes and detonate them on

>>136812907
you will need a commodore 64
and much usb cable

>>136812907
why would you?

>>136814535

To make it look like they're completely instead of kind of retarded. And to neuter their nuclear program

>>136814646
if you plan on hacking them, why not change their course to israel?

>>136812907
What's funny is that nukes are all extremely antiquated right now.

Remember that fiasco where US nukes were still relying on tapes and floppy disks from a few years ago and some of their were sent by accident to Taiwan and shit? Most of the technology to use them hasn't updated since they were used. Actually the launch code for US nukes prior to 1980 was 000000000000.

Norks probably have 1960s era computers operating their missiles. That are entirely outside of the internet. Their age ironically makes them impervious to hacking.

Also with rumors of wannacry actually coming from North Korea they might actually be more capable than the shitty internal services of the US government, see Hillary Clinton's retardation.

>>136812907
>you will need a commodore 64
You're a fucking moron. There's no way known that the C64 would be capable of this and nor would a USB cable (even with EMF shielding) even work. Their nukes are using Type C USB and would require an Amiga at minimum to compute the appropriate attack vectors. There were talks within the Pentagon of using a ColecoVision running with a Zilog Z80 in order to penetrate via a North Korean Proxy Backdoor, but even this had to be abandoned as the TMS9928A processor couldn't brute force the access codes quick enough.
In short, not do-able with what you're suggesting. Amiga. Minimum.

>>136812907
It would be easier to guide a drone to a launch site and Al-Queda it.

Pretty sure even the norks have PAL's for there nukes even if its just a padlock from china

>>136814792
What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.