What is Electric Universe Theory?
Electric universe theory is a theory that challenges the gravity-centric viewpoint that
gravity alone keeps the cosmos moving. Only gravity alone could gather clouds of gas and dust into a star or a planet. Electric universe does not attempt to replace gravity, but adds the essential role of charged particles
in motion.
How is this political?
It is becoming more apparent that academia has become infested with a culture that has become afraid to seriously question what they believe to be "right" in order for the opportunity
of advancement in their institutions. This problem is more predominant in social sciences, and I'll argue, theoretical physics and astronomy. In fields where most of their understanding is pure conjecture, such as gender studies, this issue is magnified. We are starting to see the culture of gender studies seep in to business and personal life and even history being re-written for the sake of PC-culture.
18th-19th century Astronomy/theoretical physics were the first subjects that began this debacle. These "scientists" used theoretical Eisensteinian physics as fact to explain massive interplanetary distances and attempted to make a cohesive theory that could correctly predict particle dynamics and planetary movement (Theory of everything) and failed. Following the hivemind of theoretical-physics was very important at this stage of development in order to become successful off of baseless lies. The introduction of theory of relativity based on the speed of light being the fastest moving speed in the universe has further escalated the cognitive dissonance as it introduced new paradoxes with this axiom for the quantum mechanics and theoretical physics.
Ultimately, Astronomy/TP have the same fundamental corruption as gender studies due to being completely unaware that it's impossible to have a "complete" theory for Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics due to Godel's incompleteness Theorem.
Astronomy does this with unprovable theories stated as fact in Universities and Online sources such as Dark Energy and Dark matter and for quantum mechanics, unobservable quarks making up electrons and protons. As the Incompleteness theory explains, we can keep adding more and more conjecture to Astronomy/TP but all this theoretical additions may as well be false. This doesn't mean scientists should stop trying to explain the universe. A return to repeatable, observable science is necessary and this culture of keeping dead theoretical nonsense as fact in order to move up hierarchies in your university or corporations should be destroyed.
Are other fields being infested by this culture?
History is in the process of being re-written or seemingly obvious evidence for past events are being denied.
Worlds in Collision by Velikovsky is an important novel for EU theory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7EAlTcZFwY
This documentary explains from a mythological archetypal standpoint how ancient symbols written across the globe entered a global consciousness at exactly the same time and the only explanation being a planetary cataclysmic event was embedded into human minds at some point in society.
Here are some resources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7EAlTcZFwY Ancient Sky Part 1
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eu-guides/beginners-guide/
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/eu-guides/misconceptions/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4ndIDcDSGc Incompleteness Theorem Explained
Space News by ThunderboltsProject Youtube is excellent for debunking "correct" theories of modern astronomy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUC_a-IMmGs Big Bang
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvNCWMD6so4 Dark Matter
Bump
This thread also covers other Alternative Theories that have been suppressed by status quo academics.