The Right is divided. Libertarians, National Socialists, Fascists, and Ancaps all bickering, too compartmentalized to make a difference.
Then what happened? Trump. He's oblivious to race, in bed with Israel, and has no defined ideology. But you all banded together and voted for him.
Uniting the right is possible, and when it happens, it leads to real results.
What have the any of you accomplished on your own in the past 50 years? Nothing. Some of you don't have political parties, and if you do, you're probably not a part of them. It's time to be honest with yourself. Creating a new ideology isn't abandoning your beliefs. It's learning from your mistakes and trying again.
The topic for the thread today is White Nationalism vs Ethnic Nationalism:
>What is white?
>What should we do with non-whites that are more or less integrated to Western life?
>Should the ideology be supranational?
>Is mixing of white ethnicites acceptable?
>Should the ideology favor Germanic elements of whites, or something else?
>Is it best to let ethnic lines die out in favor of a new white culture, or a federation of different peoples that remain autonomous?
I'll start with my personal views.
White nationalism is the only feasible way of achieving everyone's goals. The largest population of whites is the United States. Most people are a thorough mix of different ethnicities.
A quarter Irish quarter Italian half German is going to find any idea of ethnic purity off-putting.
>>136759038
National Socialists will probably have a problem with including Slavs, Alpines, and Mediterraneans.
However, most of you would admit that all white people possess aryan blood. You don't need state mandated breeding to ensure the best genes reproduce. Given natural selection and time, people would slowly assume the best traits.
SAD