If we make it okay to openly talk about biological differences

File: kim-coalburned.png (165KB, 360x405px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 360x405px

>>136736738

You ever heard of EO Wilson?

>>136736738
Depends how much resistance they push back with
If they wont tolerate discussing gender differences, eventually people will take umbrage and redpilling will occur faster

Exactly like how it happened here

File: 15342634.jpg (35KB, 426x425px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 426x425px

>>136736738

It already is.
It's just a "no no" subject in areas that have been locked down by liberals with an agenda.
Issues that are threatening to the core of leftist ideologies can logically be expected to be heavily protected, and when probed, you can expect liberals to freak out.
They instinctively know that they are in trouble when people start getting into the causal relationships between genetics, neurology and behavioural capacity.

A key issue we need to work on are learning to be more cryptic with our arguments; coming up with new "trojan horses" that will be able to penetrate the enemy gates time and time again.
The word "race" has certain pavlovian responses attached to it. "geolineal Population" by contrast, does not. We know what "geolinial" entails. Most of those turkeys don't. By the time they put two and two together, they will have accepted fundamental tenants of racial biology and will have far more difficulty rejecting it once they realise just what exactly it is they have entered into a conversation about.

Race as a concept is taboo, but genetics, heredity and evolution are widely accepted.
If you can't get "race" through the gate, move it piece by piece through the gate, amongst a bunch of other seemingly harmless items. Once this has been done, reassemble it. Rinse repeat.

Another key issue we need to work on, by contrast is being more aggressive with the enemy. A lot of us run for cover when liberals get mad and start throwing out logical fallacy nets. You have to blast them cold hard logic delivered with language that mesmerises them, constantly keeping them off balance and frustrated while remaining perfectly calm and at the ready. You also need to work in concert with allies if you have them.

The enemy NEED to be broken repeatedly in public in order to make it clear to onlookers that we rule the land now.
Be sensible of course, don't get yourselves killed, but we NEED to start pushing harder in the open . We have the numbers now.

>>136736738

Yeah, the truth is a slippery slope! We can't have that!

File: 1p04xxbadargumentaliensguy.jpg (39KB, 500x437px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x437px

>>136737075

Yeah.

The liberal golden age for 10 years ago basically made them fat and weak.
Remember when these motherfuckers were all post modernists and massively sceptic of everything? You talk about racial biology and they knit pick to the point that you start questioning the scientific method?
Remember the lewontin fallacy and everything being a "social construct" ???
While defeatable, those arguments were tricky, especially on first encounters, because they burdened you with task of proving literally fucking everything, even the nature of reality itself, while they comfortably assumed the role of the critic. Every argument or assertion could be "deconstructed" into something meaningless. Of course, these people saw the same world you do, but playing dumb served their purposes.
Evidence of this could be found in their contradictions, "race is a social construct" but "racism exists". Whites don't exist yet White people slavery bla bla etc.

The liberals now are flat out fucking retarded. They don't even bother to hide their anti White bias and don't even think to cover up the inherent weaknesses in their positions.

Feminists MUST believe that women exist, and INSIST that men and women are equal but...... if they believe in gender, they MUST reject biological sexual essentialism and thus MUST believe that female status is determined by stereotypical behaviorual trends...

eg, "if this man wears a dress and likes pink, he is a girl" etc etc etc.

The structural weaknesses in this position are glaringly obvious. Even some feminists are getting mad at this shit (a division within the enemy ranks we must exploit), because women simply cannot be "equal" and stereotypes cannot be "wrong" if gender is "real".
Furthermore if we become post-structuralist about this shit, if you detach biological essentialism from the subject then "women" become a "meaningless social construct" and thus feminism is pointless because "females" cease to be real.

Game over fuckers.

>>136736738
yes, but the brain is not a part of the biological body, so it's fine to talk about it.

>>136739041
That's a good way to go about it. Talking about genetically inherited things rather than just saying race, and once they've accepted that they go back. Things looked bleak a year ago to me but I think things are really changing track now.

>>136736738
i switched from left to right two years ago. always ranting about social bullshit, nobody was every right wing. since i woke up from that nightmare i just openly talk about it. now they are everywhere. hiding your opinions is for scared right wing lozers. be proud of what you believe in like the left. and then you will be impossible to silence because they would have to fire more than half their employees.