So you don't believe the US intelligence community when

File: 1502174432157.jpg (71KB, 1131x789px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1131x789px

>>136705336
Yes...
Got a problem with that?

>>136705336
>But you do believe them when they say North Korea has the capability to produce a miniaturized nuclear weapon?

give 1 example of someone believing this

>>136705336
Who are you referring to?

>>136705420
this. Capcha museme ay baby

File: 1447815520239.jpg (115KB, 1023x681px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1023x681px

>>136705336
No. The North Koreans are dumb.

Besides, they are not a credible threat.
The retaliation would be immediate and absolute.
They know that.

Do you think that NK leadership is suicidal?
That's a common propaganda theme. Seen it before with Iran.

>>136705336
i believe nk when they say they have nuclear means. only retards believe a single fucking word us intel agencies say

>>136705336
What took physicists 70 years ago 4 years to make is the plaything of technicians today.

A two stage Teller-Ulam is not a complex design. I could make one with enough money and parts from Fry's.

File: Clinton.jpg (88KB, 960x920px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 960x920px

>>136705336
Faggot.

File: 1502086406570.jpg (88KB, 435x658px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 435x658px

>>136705336
No, I don't believe that a Democrat, and Google funded tech firm, 'Crowdstrike', who blamed a Sony hack on North Korea and currently will not let anyone see their evidence is telling the truth when blaming the Russians.

What I do believe is that it is absolute bullshit that the Intelligence community is claiming they agree with Crowdstrike when they haven't been able to examine the evidence directly themselves.

The IC hasn't come to a consensus about shit, except to blow then swallow a huge fat load of a private security firm that's fucked up before and now have given them shit tons of free advertisement.