Who's ready for the Great Meme War of 2020? It may take

>>136615765
whos got a war strategy? I'm trying to cook some up

>>136615765
well since the dems will be defunct by 2020 it will be an easy win.

>>136615765
Nuclear war will happen before 2020, I hope you guys realize this

>>136615765
The next "meme war" is not going to happen.

fucking normies

>>136616460
continue pushing the narrative that the Left is engaged in suppression of speech, and make sure everyone fears what a Leftist regime will do with personal browsing information

>>136615765
>meme war

>>136616791
Can't wait, the memes are going to be hella lit.

>>136615765
>readying for a meme war
>not readying for the actual war happening
baka

>>136615765
Who will be the candidate now when Trump was exposed to be a hoax and /theirguy/ and Bill is still raping?

>>136616903
i mean technically can happen with any party, left or right. but i get your point.

Im saying the we need coordinated viral meme's or hashtags weaponised in unison. Need more ideas on that line, not the overall message. Everyone rational knows why a overly leftist controlled culture / poltical environment is horrible.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 4.47.54 PM.png (87KB, 640x450px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x450px

>>136616460
[1of 2]

The left/Democrats are going to try very hard to effectively co-opt Trump's message. Before 2016 they saw themselves as the party of the common/working man. Trump swooped in with his nativist/populist message and caught them totally off guard, taking 3 rust belt states that hadn’t been taken by the Republicans in decades.

If you are a Democrat, what is your game plan 4 years later? First, you subtly change your messaging to make it sound pretty similar to what Trump’s was (regardless of whether or not you actually intend to follow up on those policies). Leading Democrats like Chuck Schumer have already begun doing so. Pic related.
>https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/status/892779001273569281

Schumer would never have made a statement like that prior to November 2016. Second, as a Democrat, you paint the picture that Trump was very ineffective at following-up on his promises, or worse, he never even meant them. So now to all those voters in the Midwest (many of whom are independents or who just left the Democratic party) it starts to seem like (i) Trump isn’t actually saying anything particularly unique (since both parties are kinda saying it now) and (ii) that Trump failed to deliver on the things that he was saying. Oh well, the voters think, I might as well go Democrat since their message is similar and Trump didn’t deliver on that message.

File: fadfas.jpg (311KB, 1180x664px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 1180x664px

>>136615765
>>136619762

[2 of 2]

[2 of 2]
How do you fight back? The first step is to AGGRESSIVELY highlight how leading Democrats have flip-flopped into a nativist/populist message, but they have not done so out of conviction. Instead, they are doing so because they see the wind blowing that way. We need to compile – and then meme the shit out of – every single tweet, statement, etc. from leading Democrats in the past that could be interpreted as running counter to nativist/populist ideas. We want to achieve the same effect as when Hillary suddenly said she was against TPP (nobody fucking believed her, because she had such an illustrious past that suggested she supported TPP, and Trump and all of his supporters relentlessly rubbed her nose in ti). The second step is to meme the shit out of any and all accomplishments Trump has between 2016 and 2020 (regardless of whether he ends up accomplishing a lot before, he will still be a better option for us in 2020 than any Democrat). Even if there’s not much to talk about, it will be good to focus on what *would* have happened if we *hadn’t* elected Trump. (i.e., if we hadn’t picked Trump, we would have had Hillary 5X refugees, TPP signed, etc.).

>>136617122
I'm sure

File: giphy (33).gif (966KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

966KB, 480x270px

>>136615765

>>136615765
Helpful hint: You'll be too busy fighting a real war to do anything for a meme "war"

>>136616791
It will start in 2021

How does Zuckerberg think he can run without massive accusations/investigations when Facebook will inevitably be used to prop him up and censor his opposition?

File: 1487732462385.jpg (8KB, 227x222px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 227x222px

/pol/ is going to fuck with the dem primaries so much it's going to be delicious

think of it - you'll probably be able to get them to nominate someone totally unelectable

>>136622166
No, actually this week, check this 6

File: 1498533571619.png (172KB, 688x553px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 688x553px

>>136615765
I thought 2018 will be the next great meme war. In any case, I always ready.

File: 1045 - cMiMck0.png (116KB, 402x398px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 402x398px

>>136615765
MEME WAR XDD!1!1!11
PRAYZE KEK!!!1

>>136619821
>The first step is to AGGRESSIVELY highlight how leading Democrats have flip-flopped into a nativist/populist message, but they have not done so out of conviction
What about painting it as abandoning the fundamental principles of the left and attempting to bandwagon the GOP messaging? Is it possible to make their front-runners toxic to their voting base?