Why do gay people and members of the LGBT community and the liberal masses coin the phrase "love is love", yet grimace at the thought of 34 year olds and 14 year olds engaging in consensual marriage/sex? When does love not become love according to these lunatics?
>>136444012
>>136444012
>pedos resentful at gays
Imagine
My
Shock
Stop fucking kids asshole.
It's a liberal thing. They like to boil their "arguments" into a catchy slogan like "love is love" or "black lives matter" and even "no human being is illegal." They get to act virtuous and smug without actually thinking.
>>136444198
Stop fucking rectums, they're used for pooping.
My theory is that most people are rationalising their instinctive feelings of disgust at certain sex acts. For example, /pol/ claims that moral sex is between men and women of the same race, because they hate race-mixing and homosexuality. Christfags refer back to the bible because they are disgusted by gays. The LGBT cite "muh consent" because although they have no problem with acts such as dirty ass-to-mouth betwee adults, they are disgusted by bestiality and pedophilia. Meanwhile zoofags claim that it's fine so long as nobody is suffering, which is how they rationalise their hatred of pedos.
"Love is love" is ultimately a vacuous slogan used to reinforce amongst themselves that /their/ sexual morals are the "correct" ones.
>>136445042
I'm pretty disgusted by straight sex.