Anyone read this? I'm ripping through it and it seems good

>>136418120
READ IT. What's amazing is that the Jews loved his first two books where he lays out why Jews are so successful. But once he presents (and more than adequately supports) the thesis that Jews tend to weaken their host cultures as a survival mechanism, they flipped out. This book is absolutely BASED.

He was a shit ton of criticism about the book but he created a website to address any of it.

>>136418354
fucking BASED!!!!!!

>>136418120
Occidental Observer in on my daily reading list. I do think Ev Psych sometimes borders on pseudoscience, but CoC can be read simply as a historical analysis, whether you believe the explanatory theory behind the history.

>>136418120
CoC is flawless, especially with lube

>>136418120
>>136418354
it's decent look at the JQ but like much sociobiology, it falls apart at the explanatory level.

He tries to address this in Separation and its Discontents, but his argument is wholly unconvincing and imo reveals him as a second-rate thinker.