ALL AROUND ME ARE FAMILIAR FACES http://www.newsweek.com/tr

>>136394887
Please archive those
https://archive.is/yadYQ

File: 1494773586487.png (392KB, 665x685px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 665x685px

>>136394887
Blumpf /BTFO/

>>136394887
Just like the election right?

>>136395112
identify the sampling error of OP's poll, otherwise admit you're retarded

Reminder that polls are propaganda and none of them predicted the truth. Many hide that they're Trump supporters.

File: polling.png (19KB, 776x173px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 776x173px

If you read some of the polling that the article states it's pretty fucking retarded honestly

The majority of the "independents" Just parroted the same things that the dems said

Feels fabricated

File: IMG_0004.jpg (47KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 320x320px

>>136395867
Absolutely this. I made 2k on the election and the reason is
>Oversampling of "independents"
>Independents were basically dems

It's not even worth looking at them at this point, they all do the same sleight of hand.

But faggots like >>136395210 will insist you're a retard if you don't take time out of your day to prove THIS whore is trash, even though she looks, acts, and says the identical things all previous whores did.

>>136394887
Citing an anti-Trump poll should be laughable at this point.

>>136394887
What do the pols say about the next civil war?
How pissed are Americans?
How many of us want to hang them from trees?

The day of the Locust is coming lads. And they WILL swing.

Hahahahahahhaha
>polling
Also it didn't work last time , why would it work now?

Poll vs 30000+ people show up to listen to Trump everywhere whereas Hillary struggling to get 50 without Photoshop, really activate my neuro matrix.

>>136395210
>identify the sampling error of OP's poll

Here is the error.

>newsweek

>>136394887
>(((polls)))
lol